The coaches tape which is done from one end zone and from the top of the press box has to focus on the plays on the field, not the guy calling in the plays with hand signals.
Dont minimize what your team did. They were stealing signals, reviewing them during halftime and then using that to their advantage in the second half.
At home, they would intercept headset signals.
Your team cheated. Brady's numbers will never count in my eyes since he knew what the defense was in most of the time.
Accept it. Embrace it. Move on.
Don't try to piss on our heads and tell us it's raining. Your team cheated. Your team also is credited for winning. Something tells me if it really didn't bother you then you wouldn't be spending this much time trying to defend the actions. You'll be happier if you just: Accept it. Embrace it. Move on.
Its not like the Pats were hiding Matt Walsh, and he was hidden under the stands, he was in Patriots gear with a huge video camera on his shoulder, right out front. The Pats were very upfront about the whole practice. This was an ego thing, BB thought, the way the rule was written he had a loophole and was allowed to do it. If he thought it was so wrong, and he could get in trouble for it, please explain why he had a person as clear as day standing there in patriots garb from head to toe doing it on the sideline for everyone to see. He clearly thought he could not get in trouble for it.
Goodels over the top reaction for such a minor offense was because he put out a memo which BB ignored, and he had just taken over the job, and he had to let everyone know there was a new sheriff in town, and he will not be ignored.
It is also the reason why the Saints got punished so hard. not because of the actual bounty, but because he told them for two years not to do it, and they continued to do it. If Paul Tags was the commissionaire in 2007, this would have been like a 20K fine to BB, and no lose of draft pick, but Rodger though he could not have the elite coach in his sport, ignoring him, so he made the penalty harsh.
Why because Whiney Faulk says so? Or are you believing the story that came out before the SB that was later retracted as made up and false? Nice try yourself.
And although it has been repeatedly denied, it is unfathomable to ANY reasonable thinking person to believe that teams had the ability to decipher those signals in the 12 minutes at halftime and relay that info back to the team on the field in the time it took between when the play was called and the ball was snapped. Plus I've never heard anyone with this theory mention that many teams change up their signals between halves and sometimes between quarters.
I suppose you believe that the gov't is building underground cities all around us, too.
Like i always always say.....
And this week Ray Lewis this week.
But cheating azzes Patriots get the media pass....everytime i hear Hall of Fame Head Coach and Greatets of all time QB....i fugging puke inside.
Peter Falk > Kevin Faulk > Marshall Faulk
On a side note, I'm STILL not over the "too many men on the ice" call in Game 7 of the 1979 Stanley Cup Finals. Bruins 3 minutes from the cup.
I was cheated out of so much joy.
Reparations. I want them.
If only these Patsie Trolls would have defended their team after getting smoked by the Ravens with such fervor, as they are for cheating
24% of Americans think God let the Patriots cheat.
Pats' Asterisks of Excellence >>>>>>>>> Jets' Asterisks of Comical Irrelevance