Except one of your chief complaints is that the Jets did not trade up to draft "that playmaking WR" and "that playmaking TE".
Originally Posted by SAR I
As you know, both of those players would be rookies.
Your position thus lacks consistency. On one hand you denounce rookies as not counting, on the other you denounce the team for not aquiring unnamed rookies who you seem to imply would count.
Sanchez/Tebow/McElroy is in no way comparable to Sanchez/Gerrard/Smith in terms of competition for the #1 job.
1 reason is based on you hearing the hot Jets buzzword of "competition" which imploded at QB last season
Again, lacking consistency of argument. One of your chief complaints is the loss of Keller, yet he was also "on the roster coming out of Cortland" (itself a arbitary point to use, it should be mentioned and not a good barometer for the entire seasons results) and "did nothing before getting hurt" last year as well.
1 reason is a WR we had last year who didn't do anything before be got injured.
If the return of Holmes is to be minimized, then the loss of Keller (a non-entity in 2012) must also be minimized if you wish to retain any form of intellectual consistency.
It should once again be pointed out that you decry our aquisitions as "JAGs", yet can offer not a single non-JAG name that we could/should have aquired instead.
5 reasons are dependent upon JAG's from other teams.
If you discount rookies (as you do) we aquire and you discount universally all free agents we aquire (without naming alternatives), what exactly did you expect as our vehicle for improvement?
Again, it cannot be stressed enough that your argument is illogical and inconsistent when it comes to the critical assessment of the moves we've made. Youe end prediction of a poor record itself is fine, but how you get to that point, and your universal disdain within your argument, makes no consistent, logical sense given your complete lack of argument that any other option would have been superior, or that somehow the roookies and JAG's you fail to name would count but those we got do not count.
And you certainly may be right. We'll see when we see.
Yeah, still feels like 4-12 to me.