1. That document is a DECLARATION, not a DEPOSITION.
2. It is OPINION, not FACT. Nothing in the document evidences that the DECLARANT had first hand knowledge of vote theft. If he did, he would be a FACT WITNESS, not an EXPERT WITNESS.
3.As an EXPERT WITNESS, the declarant is no more than a hired gun, paid to take a position consistent with position of the plaintiff.
4. His conclusion re: "hacking" is PURE SPECULATION -- thus his so-called OPINION is UNINFORMED and INCOMPETENT. His statements re: Mr. Connell (whoever he is) may be LIBELOUS. The so-called EXPERT's positions are contaminated by the evident disdain and prejudice he holds regarding Mr. Connell's religious beliefs. Why would any lawyer in his or her right mind ever allow such trash to find its way into an expert declaration?
5. the truth comes out on CROSS EXAMINATION.
why haven't you bothered to post the cross?
Last edited by nyahay bus; 09-30-2008 at 10:05 AM.