[QUOTE=Beerfish;4475063]No, he's 100% correct in this case. The fact that he destoryed evidence that could have been used in potential court cases immediately after his decision was flat out wrong and smacks of favoritism. This essentially confirms it. Blast Ray Ray on his overly optomistic views of the jets all you want but in this case he is totally correct and your post which was simply an attack and did ZERO to refute his comments kind of proves it.[/QUOTE]
Nope. His logic is clouded, as usual, by his blind hate of all things Patriot. If anyone wanted to sue Goodell over Spygate, all they have to do is subpenae Glazers copies of the tapes. Goodell never got his hands on those.:rolleyes:
[QUOTE=patman;4475132]I thought I knew alot about spy gate, apparently I don't. What kind of evidence
do you think Goddel had about spygate. [B]The pats showed the legue tapes showing that they taped defensive signals then immediately shot to the scoreboard so they could tell when, where and down and distance the opposing team was at.[/B] What else do you think was on the tapes?
it was the same type of info that was on the tape that mangini told the nfl rep and the nfl rep seized.[/QUOTE]
League rules REQUIRE teams to film every down and every play. They are REQUIRED to shoot the scoreboard showing time, down and distance before every play. Of course, there's [U]no league rule against filming coach's signals[/U]. A fact conveniently ignored repeatedly by the tinfoil hat crowd. But thank you Ray, for adding yet another Spygate thread to JI. It's been at least a week since your last one.