Originally Posted by PatsFanTX
It's been 7 years since Spygate.
If Spygate actually gave the Pats some sort of competitive advantage on offense, why has their offense been so much more productive than pre-Sygate?
If the Pats were a stumbling .500 team with a bottom 3rd offense over the last 7 years, your arguement might have some validity.
Losing 2 Super Bowl's on two plays has nothing to do with Spygate whatsoever, and you know it.
More than anything it can just be karma that cost NE 2 SB's