Quote:
Originally Posted by piney
that is a bold face lie, a stupid bit of conjecture, and a strawman argument. I never once said it should be illegal.
|
Maybe you should read what you write.
Quote:
Originally Posted by piney
free speech extends you the right up until it becomes harmful to someone else.
|
Pretty clear that your positionw as that spech rights end where "harm" starts, and "harming" others is generally illegal. So you're position was one of limitation of rights due to harm being caused, said limitation which can only be imposed by teh State.
So no, it's not a lie. either you do not understand what the emaning of the words you wrote quoted above, or you misspke. either way, means very little.
Quote:
|
Somehow that translated to "ZOMG! HE WANTS TO RESTRICT FREE SPEECH! ZOMG!!"
|
I'll quote it again, for reference:
Quote:
Originally Posted by piney
free speech extends you the right up until it becomes harmful to someone else.
|
Rather clear IMO that yes, you were supporting a new limitation on the definition of free speech, that speech that caused "harm" as you define it was not, in fact, free speech at all, hence not protected speech.
Quote:
Again, all predicated on the lie you told yourself and believe that I
said speech should be illegal.
|
*sigh*