Quote:
Originally Posted by SAR I
The question is whether or not he's shown enough in the past to make it worthwhile to invest a proper HC, OC, WR, TE, RB, and OL in him. I say yes.
SAR I
|
And there it is.
In order for Mark Sanchez to succeed, we'd have to replace every person involved in the O, Head Coach, O-Co, and every player around him.
Or....
We could replace Sanchez, and see if another QB can do better with what we have and hopefully some realistic-level of improvement.
Because the fact is, we're not getting all-pro players and perfect O-based Coaches at every spot for Sanchez. It's impossible.
But we CAN find a QB who can play better than 48% completion, 2+ turnovers a game, and yet another no-points performance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAR I
If Dan Marino 1986 was our quarterback today, the Jets defense still gives up 28 points and we still lose.
That's the point.
|
Your point is wrong. Flat out wrong, and I think most fans with any clue know it at this point.
Dan Marino on this team is still Dan Marino, and he performs.
Mark Sanches is Mark Sanchez. Unable to complete passes reliably to even open recievers. Turnovers to spare. And an inabillity to score. This is the legacy of the Mark Sanchez Era in New York. An underperforming O since the day he arrived till today.
Yes, there is no shortage of blame to go around.
And it starts and ends with the single most vital position on the football field, the QB. Ours, currently, is the worst in the NFL.