Quote:
Originally Posted by ytfootballfan
I didn't magically add anything. I'm simply putting it into context which you should certainly do when using stats.
Which stats show he is bad? 1? I showed you plenty of others that shows he isn't just good, but GREAT! You can ignore them all you want. I didn't. I simply presented plenty of other MORE IMPORTANT stats that carry more direct weight on winning and losing than 2 freaking completions a game.
Top 5 in int%
Top 5 in TD/Int ratio.
Top 5 in rushing efficiency.
#1 in air yardage efficient.
Etc, etc.
Bottom in completion %.
So he's 2 completions short of a 55% completion percentage and that negates everything else? That 1 stat means he is bad? That's all there is to being an NFL quarterback? Interesting...how many other quarterbacks do you use this excellent logic on?
Because if completion % is everything to you, certainly Mark is the worst quarterback in the NFL.
|
As long as we're adding completions to improve his completion percentage, let's add more INTs to skew his TD/INT ratio and INT% stats.
And again, you're dragging Mark into this when I never even brought him up in the first place. What barring does Mark's stats have on this discussion? We're discussing TEBOW being bad, breh. Try to keep up.