What is the dividing line between Terrorism and an internal Rebellion/Civil War?
Was the Tea Party designed to inspite terror in.....who, British subjects? Did it succeed?
I'm well aware of the old saying, "One mans terrorist is another man's freedom fighter". Perspective clearly plays a role.
But should we not have somewhat strict definitions of some things based on the action, the target, and the purpose?
By that kind of definition, would the Tea Party be Terrorism? I don't think so.