Quote:
Originally Posted by PMarsico9
Band-Aid fixes.
|
As stated, I think this is a bit SOJF to think we need this much change. We don't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMarsico9
LT, both Guard spots, QB, RB, WR (Hill should be a 3 or 4 until he shows some consistency catch the ball), TE (Keller isn't worth what he's going to ask for) on offense need looked at and upgraded if possible. Kerley's a #3, not a #2.
Unfortunately, Sanchez and Holmes are glued here for at least next season. You get to a point that it may be worth just having your cap reduced and dump both or just Holmes and eating the cap punishment.
It is vital to generate some good vibes with the fans and retaining either would not do that.
|
Again, I have a QB and RB drafted high, and a SOLID WR picked in Free agency. Holmes is back next season, and Hill would be a #3. Sanchez will be traded either next year or year after, and Holmes will be gone after next season.
Defense:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMarsico9
D-line is OK, would be better with a true pass rusher. The idea of going to a 4-3 plays well with this personnel. Provided they can get a pass rusher.
Wilkerson, Ellis, and Coples provide hybrid DT/DE type players. There's no "elite" pass rusher amongst them though. I'd prefer to get a 320+ LB. DT to play nose then have Ellis play DT. Or keep DeVito. Pouha's probably done at this point.
|
Wilkerson and Coples have been applying pressure themselves. With a rebuilt linebacking core, they would be fine. It is not pressing next year. However, in 2014 another d-lineman would be advisable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMarsico9
All LB positions need revamped. Harris is, like Sanchez, probably stuck here, but he's not anywhere near the level of what he's paid.
|
And they are: Two new OLB's with Davis seeing more time split with Harris.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMarsico9
CB: I like Trufant. He's a good Nickle guy. Lankster isn't bad. Wilson has to go, he's not worth the roster slot. Revis and Cro should end their careers here. I appreciate what you are trying to suggest in that trade scenario, but I don't think it's feasible to move Revis when his value is so low coming off an ACL at a speed position and get a legit equal return.
Lankster isn't a bad dime guy.
|
Revis cannot end his career as a Jet, unless you want more cap problems in the future. You cannot tie up as much money in a CB as Revis wants.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMarsico9
S: Both are very good, imo. Landry's a Pro-Bowler, but odds are he gets a contract and then says his Achilles' has flared up and gives you 6-8 games for the next 3-4 years. His pay will be extremely high and this team can't invest any more massive contracts into the secondary.
Keep Bell, offer a 1-2 year deal to Landry, but you can't blow the bank on him, despite him largely being the best player on the team this year next to Wilkerson.
A bad GM will throw him what he's asking and set back the Safety position for years as his Achilles' is not 100% healthy.
Erik Smith has to go. Absolutely has to.
|
Smith is gone next year (if Rex is gone), and Bell would be resigned. Landry I would resign if he doesn't want the bank broke open. If not, a safety would need to be drafted somewhere in those first five picks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMarsico9
Both Malone and Folk can be improved upon.
|
Why? Both have been money....
[/QUOTE]