Originally Posted by Borgoguy
First, please forgive the imposition of my response to JumbledSh itJest. But, unlike this individual, I respond to a person's accusations face-to-face rather than cowering behind a filthy cloak.
See, last Spring, during my Mom's illness and death, I was offline for a number of months. Upon my return, I noticed that someone had created a thread in the Hampur asking me to "come back". As I read through the thread, there was Jumbled's comment decrying the thread's intent as I was worthless and that my sole function in this community was to post "pornographic material" on JI which anyone could find on their own. (Odd that both Ray and Jumbled would take this tack, right? Or is it?)
First, I would argue that since joining JI in 2007, the great majority of my posts have contributed to various discussions related to the Jets, music, TV/film, and/or humor.
Second, this self-proclaimed "genius of JI" does not understand the word he likes to misuse, pornography. During my tenure here, I have never posted one pornographic image. None have depicted an explicit sexual act or even genital nudity. Zero.
But why would facts enter JumbledS hit's position in an argument when lies and slander are readily available and effortlessly foisted as genuine? Why confront a person with your vile poison when a churl like Jumbled can do it from the comfort of his malodorous warren seeking only to promulgate his narrow-minded, poorly constructed, and flawed agenda? Back in the days of WWII, folks would call such a quisling such as Jumbled a "yellow rat bastard".
In Jumbled's disoriented philosophy (flummoxing to even brilliant theologians and life-long politicos), images of women are always seen as prurient, never as beauty, art, or a natural component of wholesome sexual attraction.
I'm sure a casual walk-through at the Louvre would prompt a tersely worded note to the French government, or local religious entities, about the rampant "pornography (once again, his misuse of the word) on display and its corrupting impact on women and children who witness it. No doubt, upon viewing Michelangelo's David, he would brand the visionary Renaissance master as a "pornographer" whose only intent was to pollute society with graphic male nudity.
Finally, now that all this is out in the open, my hope is that JumbledS hitJest will finally confront, and eventually--through a protracted course of therapy--conquer, his demons related to sexual repression, morbid jealousy (often called "Othello Syndrome"), and crushing self-loathing. Although, to be honest, even if Carl Jung were alive and handling the arduous task, it will be a long road to eventually finally recognizing his failings as a human being and limited spiritual awakening with any hope of redemption in the afterlife (if one exists).
Oh, almost forgot. You never answered how you're able to post here with a new username after your old one, the aptly titled "FlushingJet, was banned. I know most of us can't just get banned, then show up spewing the same malice filled diatribes without missing a beat. Inside deal?