Originally Posted by southside
No. It's the list of WRs that were drafted specifically because of their combine numbers and not because of their play on the field that ended up stinking up the NFL.
Thomas wasn't even #3 option in his rookie year.
So that's hardly a good comparison.
Hill was the 3rd option behind kerley and holmes until holmes got hurt, so really not that different.
Plus the denver roster and our roster have no basis in the comparison....it just shows that they didnt depend on thomas and we have been forced to depend on hill.
Lastly, he wasnt drafted on his combine performance. He is a non-diva Wr, who blocks, works hard and has big play ability, he simply wasnt given opportunities in college.