Originally Posted by McGinley
So it would appear. To me, I think that's the big picture here. All the privacy and tattoo debate aside, the thing we should all be focusing on is Rex's decision-making. That is, ultimately, what this is all REALLY about.
I'm pretty sure that's what you were trying to point out to people earlier on this subject, no?
I have not posted on this thread and the only thing I am going to say is can those who say it is no big deal point to one HC in NFL HISTORY that has taken a similar action....
It is called judgement and decision making period....... It is the only thing at issue.
But a 700 thread post on this for a tatoo!!!
Come on Now!!