Quote:
Originally Posted by bcess
Doesn't the fact that he was cut prior to the playoffs say something?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcess
I meant the niners, kinda weird to cut a guy prior to the post season. You never know when injuries pop up
|
So you're saying we shouldn't bring back Braylon since he was kicked out the door because he was injured in San Fran?
What logic....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Untouchable
We don't have one remotely decent QB on our roster, yet everyone is concerned about the future of a washed up Braylon Edwards?
LOL, okay.
|
Washed-up in your mind maybe......That's not what the Majority here saw when he got his chance to show if he had anything left to at least be serviceable.
I'd like to have weapons(real ones....not JAGS like Schillens) available for WHEN the Jets get a "decent QB" which they don't have. Otherwise, if you don't have weapons and you bring in a "decent QB", who the fuk is that QB going to throw to? The fans in the stands?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Untouchable
Hey, if Gamble sees it fit to bring back Braylon at the vet minimum as our #4 receiver, why not?
Just as long as that remains his role and he doesn't eat into Hill's playing time or any rookie that we may take early in the draft.
|
Oh yes...God forbid we stunt the growth of a Wide-Receiver who is at least 3 full seasons away from even being considered NFL-Caliber. I mean let's not sign someone to hold the fort until that time....Let's instead continue throwing the kid to the wolves and continue dropping passes at critical moments.
Good lord, man....
EDIT : In case you didn't get the message, Hill does NOT impress me at all. I was willing to give him a chance(still do) but he needs to be eased into the position. He's just not ready.