Originally Posted by Warfish
If what you got from my many posts here is "no aid for natural disasters", then yes, it means exactly what it says on the tin, and having a semantics argument about it is boring.
Suffice to say, no, my position is not "no aid".
Appreciate the feedback tho.
I was responding to one post, and didn't realize it was from early in the thread (damn you, tapatalk!). If you're position changed or was clarified since you made that post, add I guess it was, I missed it. I am surely glad to see that you feel that sometimes FEMA should use natural disaster relief/recovery funds to aid in natural disaster relief/recovery.