Thread: Hey SAR...
View Single Post
Old 01-18-2013, 12:48 PM   #35
Warfish
JetsInsider.com Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 35,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAR I View Post
I don't recall you filling in those blanks, don't recall you asking every other poster for their list. Please show me where everyone else put their names on these positions.
Deflection. You took a public position, and were unable to defend it when questioned more deeply about that position.

Quote:
I'm not asking someone to take a guess at who the new GM, OC, DC, etc. etc. will be because that's not something the typical Jets fan would be good at. I wouldn't even care to listen if offered, in fact.
Deflection. "Anyone but..." is not a valid position on running a business.

Quote:
Ah, but giving 10 simple reasons why Rex Ryan is a great head coach for the 2013 Jets? Anyone can do that. Especially fans who have seen 200+ games in their lives. Should be very simple to tell us why Rex Ryan is great for this year's team without the history lesson.
Already done in this thread once, and doen again in my reply above.

Quote:
Never said that. Not sure why you're lying, not very proper. What I'm on record as wanting was an experienced personnel guy, an A+ candidate, someone who can right this ship.


Your lack of enthusiasm for almost every candidate mentuioned, and your specific disdain for the gentleman from Seattle is on record.

The fact that you are unable or unwilling to name or support-in-advance a single candidate that fits your description is also on record.

Quote:
Ah, so here is my response to your question of "not putting my name on it" and just "calling out the issues". So I come up with a very good, very bold answer.....and that's wrong too. Get your story straight.
It's a 100% unrealistic answer, worse than simpyl a non-answer because you know it's 100% unrealistic. You may as well have said you're resurrect Weeb Eubank with strange new alien technology....and offer him 10% of teh etam to Coach it.

Your answer is not bold. Your answer is simply fantasy, despigned specificly so you do not have to put your name on any real-world options.

Quote:
I never said that. If you're going to lie, don't waste my time. I said Mark Sanchez has a 30% chance to perhaps be a good QB under different circumstances. Well, the 'different circumstances' are here. New OC, new players, new everything right around the corner. Let's give him a chance. That's the rational decision. You just want to throw him aside. Not smart.
Again, your position in support of Mark Sanchez as the startign QB of the New York Jets in 2013, despite beign the worst QB of the past four seasons, is on record for those who wish to wade through your thousands of recent posts on the topic.

Quote:
Show me the list of every JI posters' choices for these positions. Or, better yet, show me yours. I don't recall you taking a position on anyone, just pointing out other posters' issues and demanding answers you yourself won't give.
More deflection. You have no named any O-Co, but surely you will denounce whomever is hired.

Same as you've already done for our GM.
Warfish is offline   Reply With Quote