Originally Posted by TheMikeIsHot
Unless there is a Revis for Rodgers deal in the works, I don't see any reason to trade him.
They aren't fixing the offense without getting a QB, and the only way they will get a QB is to draft one. They have an opportunity to draft a QB this year, and that has no affect on the re-signing of Revis.
The offense will be fixed the moment they draft a good QB. Signing Revis does not prevent them from drafting a QB and trading him does not ensure they get the QB who will fix this team.
My point is, there is no guarantee that trading him fixes anything. At the same time, keeping him does not prevent them from finding a QB.
I really don't know why this is so hard to understand.
I'll go ahead and break it down for you:
- We have no QB
- We have no RB
- We have no TE
- We have a giant question mark at WR
- 2/5 of our OL is set to hit the market
- 3/4 of our LB corps needs to be replaced
- Both of our safeties are headed out the door
This team is going through a fullblown rebuilding phase.
Yet we should give a CB a contract on par with the most elite franchise QB's in the game today?
You'll have to forgive me if I consider that the silliest goddamn thing I've ever heard.