Originally Posted by crasherino
I think we are getting a little too far ahead of ourselves with the multiple #1s or a #1 plus a #2/#3 etc. This is a guy who is coming off an injury who is under contract for 1 more year - why would a team give up a king's ransom for 1 year of Revis?
I know its fun to talk about and GM's are salivating at the thought of adding Revis, but unless they can agree to a monster contract in advance of completing the deal, I don't know why anyone would agree to trade a #1 + for a guy going into FA.
And, as we know, Revis doesn't do anyone favors in contract negotiations.
Im sure any big offer will be contingent on working out a contract extension with Revis.
1st and a 2d is realistic...agree with the Denver logic. Hit while the iron is hot.