Originally Posted by eaglenj
Can anyone say with reasonably certainity that reggie bush would be more productive then a RB we find in the draft who will cost $3+ million less per year.
There is just very little value in paying FA RBs
Well I look at it this way: Bush would add immediate production. I like Joe but Bush is better than him now. Unless the Jets luck out and draft a RB that can provide Bush's ability immediately you're just waiting again..
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2