Originally Posted by chiefst2000
I'm confused. If playing well in regular season games means nothing and playing well in preseason games means nothing then how did you come to the conclusion that "Flynn is not the answer?". Are you extrapolating that, since Clowney played well in pre-season but sucked in the regular season, then Flynn playing well in preseason means he will suck in the regular season? Do you have some other reasoning to say that Flynn is not the answer.
Yes, as an avid LSU fan I watched almost everyone of Flynn's games in college. He couldn't beat out the great Marcus Randell or the bust Jamarcus Russell and only saw the field when Russell was injured or left in 2007 for the draft. Flynn's stock was elevated solely by that 1 game against the Lions. He is not starting material just ask Joe Philbin or Pete Carroll. I can see why people are clamoring to replace Sanchez ( although I believe for unfounded reasons entirely) , I just can't see why they want to replace him with a question mark who's never been good enough to start anywhere he went besides HS. It would take 3 weeks for the fanbase to turn on him , if we're going to upgrade the position , then upgrade it , don't just throw **** at the wall and hope it sticks.