Originally Posted by Untouchable
Patterson isn't worth a Top 10 pick, period.
I'd much rather have someone like Patton, Hunter, Woods, Bailey, etc in the 2nd/3rd round than Patterson at #9.
I just dont see the infatuation with this guy. He measured under 6-2, has one year of so-so production at the D1 level, and has suspect hands. Given his sub 6-2 height, he isnt that great of a "speed/size" guy either. To me, he would be a massive reach at 9.