McClellan book admits wrongdoing in Plamegate - Page 3 - Jets Insider.com Forums

Come Back to NY · 11-21-2007, 01:58 PM

[QUOTE=Jetdawgg;2222025]Not really. The republican senate has vetoed a lot of the bills or in the very least supported the Bush doctrine. It is unsustainable and will cease very soon.

There are a lot of republicans giving up their seats before the next election and the American people still want change. We will get it.[/QUOTE]

blah-blah-blah-blah....

the usual BS from the lunatic left who waved the pom-poms last year yet won't admit what a failure they have been based on the agenda they were elected for....

Phoenixx · 11-21-2007, 02:21 PM

[QUOTE=Jetdawgg;2222025]Not really. The republican senate has vetoed a lot of the bills [/QUOTE]

The Senate can't veto a bill.

Civics 101.

Jetdawgg · 11-21-2007, 02:41 PM

[QUOTE=Phoenixx;2222077]The Senate can't veto a bill.

Civics 101.[/QUOTE]

Blocked passage. My bad

jets5ever · 11-21-2007, 02:51 PM

[QUOTE=bitonti;2222033]this sounds like just another day in washington but there is a small chance McClellan's book provides the opening for a Bush impeachment.[/QUOTE]

Uh, yeah, you're crazy.

bitonti · 11-21-2007, 02:59 PM

[QUOTE=jets5ever;2222133]Uh, yeah, you're crazy.[/QUOTE]

why's that, cause your boy Bush is doing such a bang up job?

chicadeel · 11-21-2007, 03:05 PM

That didn't take too long.

Publisher: McClellan doesn't believe Bush lied
Spokesman 'did not intend to suggest' the president purposely misled him

McClellan didn't intend to suggest Bush lied
Nov. 21: Scott McClellan's publisher says the president's former spokesman does not believe the president lied to him about the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame. NBC's Jeannie Ohm reports.

MSNBC News Services
updated 2:52 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2007
WASHINGTON - Former White House spokesman Scott McClellan does not believe President Bush lied to him about the role of White House aides I. Lewis Scooter Libby or Karl Rove in the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity, according to McClellan's publisher.

Peter Osnos, the founder and editor-in-chief of Public Affairs Books, which is publishing McClellan's book in April, tells NBC from his Connecticut home that McCLellan, "Did not intend to suggest Bush lied to him."

Osnos says when McClellan went before the White House press corps in 2003 to publicly exonerate Libby and Rove, the problem was that his statement was not true. Osnos said the president told McClellan what "he thought to be the case." But, he says, McClellan believes, "the president didn't know it was not true."

sec.101row23 · 11-21-2007, 03:18 PM

Sounds like the publisher is trying to drum up some publicity and thats it.

sackdance · 11-21-2007, 03:30 PM

[QUOTE=sec.101row23;2222174]Sounds like the publisher is trying to drum up some publicity and thats it.[/QUOTE]
Tough luck, the bombshell is out of its cage. And electrifying the electorate.

Come Back to NY · 11-21-2007, 05:33 PM

[QUOTE=chicadeel;2222155]That didn't take too long.

Publisher: McClellan doesn't believe Bush lied
Spokesman 'did not intend to suggest' the president purposely misled him

McClellan didn't intend to suggest Bush lied
Nov. 21: Scott McClellan's publisher says the president's former spokesman does not believe the president lied to him about the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame. NBC's Jeannie Ohm reports.

MSNBC News Services
updated 2:52 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2007
WASHINGTON - Former White House spokesman Scott McClellan does not believe President Bush lied to him about the role of White House aides I. Lewis Scooter Libby or Karl Rove in the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity, according to McClellan's publisher.

Peter Osnos, the founder and editor-in-chief of Public Affairs Books, which is publishing McClellan's book in April, tells NBC from his Connecticut home that McCLellan, "Did not intend to suggest Bush lied to him."

Osnos says when McClellan went before the White House press corps in 2003 to publicly exonerate Libby and Rove, the problem was that his statement was not true. Osnos said the president told McClellan what "he thought to be the case." But, he says, McClellan believes, "the president didn't know it was not true."[/QUOTE]

oh well....

first the left had their Fitzmass ruined and now they will be miserable tomorrow on Thanksgiving...

don't worry lunatics- I'm sure they'll be more spit-string you can eventually grasp on to.....

Warfish · 11-21-2007, 08:25 PM

Left Wing Radio Pearl of Wisdom for Today:

From the Randi Rhodes Show (Guest Host Today).......paraphrased, of course.

"Well, it is certainly odd that McClelland and his publisher would release this blurb so early, since his book doesn't come out till April. And the reason may be to save his own life. It's well known that the criminal Bush Administration has murdered people to protect it's secrets on a number of occasions. I think McClelland may have released this blurb so early, because he knew that if the Bush Administration found out he was going to write this, they would have him killed for such a revelation".

Come Back to NY · 11-21-2007, 08:36 PM

[QUOTE=Warfish;2222615]Left Wing Radio Pearl of Wisdom for Today:

From the Randi Rhodes Show (Guest Host Today).......paraphrased, of course.

"Well, it is certainly odd that McClelland and his publisher would release this blurb so early, since his book doesn't come out till April. And the reason may be to save his own life. It's well known that the criminal Bush Administration has murdered people to protect it's secrets on a number of occasions. I think McClelland may have released this blurb so early, because he knew that if the Bush Administration found out he was going to write this, they would have him killed for such a revelation".[/QUOTE]

I'll do you one better...

about 7PM tonight I am driving home listening to the evening news on the car radio, 880 CBS....they are continuing with the headline that "former PS Scott McLellan blamed GWB for leaking the names of a CIA agent".....

you expect that sh!t from a mindless moron like randi rodent...

sackdance · 11-21-2007, 09:07 PM

[QUOTE=cr726;2220339]Not one post from the typical rightwing posters will acknowledge the topic.[/QUOTE]

Moooooooooo!

HDCentStOhio · 11-21-2007, 10:45 PM

[QUOTE=Warfish;2222615]Left Wing Radio Pearl of Wisdom for Today:

From the Randi Rhodes Show (Guest Host Today).......paraphrased, of course.

"Well, it is certainly odd that McClelland and his publisher would release this blurb so early, since his book doesn't come out till April. And the reason may be to save his own life. It's well known that the criminal Bush Administration has murdered people to protect it's secrets on a number of occasions. I think McClelland may have released this blurb so early, because he knew that if the Bush Administration found out he was going to write this, they would have him killed for such a revelation".[/QUOTE]

I think she is confusing the Bush Administration with the Clinton Administration. Just ask Vince Foster.

Golferjet · 11-27-2007, 09:45 PM

BTW...What ever happened to the massive stockpile of Iraqi WMD's that Colin Powell described in such great detail to the UN Security Council in February 2003?

Anyone...Anyone...Bueller?

Jetdawgg · 11-28-2007, 12:50 PM

[QUOTE=Golferjet;2232842]BTW...What ever happened to the massive stockpile of Iraqi WMD's that Colin Powell described in such great detail to the UN Security Council in February 2003?

Anyone...Anyone...Bueller?[/QUOTE]

See when they could not find any WMD, the story became Iraq slammed into the WTC.....

Warfish · 11-28-2007, 01:46 PM

[QUOTE=Jetdawgg;2233753]See when they could not find any WMD, the story became Iraq slammed into the WTC.....[/QUOTE]

Thats funny, I don't remember hearing it that way.

Care to provide the quotation where Bush says, in no uncertain terms, that Iraq/Saddam Hussain was the planner, organizer and staffer for the 9/11 attacks?

Thanks.

Jetdawgg · 11-28-2007, 02:55 PM

[QUOTE=Warfish;2233906]Thats funny, I don't remember hearing it that way.

Care to provide the quotation where Bush says, in no uncertain terms, that Iraq/Saddam Hussain was the planner, organizer and staffer for the 9/11 attacks?

Thanks.[/QUOTE]

Here we go again:

[url]http://crazyeye.newsvine.com/_news/2007/07/12/833822-bush-claims-iraqi-insurgants-the-ones-who-attacked-us-on-911[/url]

[url]http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/03/13/MNG7UOK2D61.DTL[/url]

[url]http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2003/09/16/cheney_link_of_iraq_911_challenged/[/url]

[url]http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/093003C.shtml[/url]

[url]http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?pid=120112[/url]

[url]http://www.bushlies.net/[/url]

I hope that this helps....

11-21-2007, 05:33 PM	#49
Come Back to NY Making lotsa $$$ off obama's stupidity... Jets Insider VIP JetsInsider.com Legend Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 31,407	[QUOTE=chicadeel;2222155]That didn't take too long. Publisher: McClellan doesn't believe Bush lied Spokesman 'did not intend to suggest' the president purposely misled him McClellan didn't intend to suggest Bush lied Nov. 21: Scott McClellan's publisher says the president's former spokesman does not believe the president lied to him about the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame. NBC's Jeannie Ohm reports. MSNBC News Services updated 2:52 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2007 WASHINGTON - Former White House spokesman Scott McClellan does not believe President Bush lied to him about the role of White House aides I. Lewis Scooter Libby or Karl Rove in the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity, according to McClellan's publisher. Peter Osnos, the founder and editor-in-chief of Public Affairs Books, which is publishing McClellan's book in April, tells NBC from his Connecticut home that McCLellan, "Did not intend to suggest Bush lied to him." Osnos says when McClellan went before the White House press corps in 2003 to publicly exonerate Libby and Rove, the problem was that his statement was not true. Osnos said the president told McClellan what "he thought to be the case." But, he says, McClellan believes, "the president didn't know it was not true."[/QUOTE] oh well.... first the left had their Fitzmass ruined and now they will be miserable tomorrow on Thanksgiving... don't worry lunatics- I'm sure they'll be more spit-string you can eventually grasp on to..... Last edited by Come Back to NY; 11-21-2007 at 05:58 PM.

11-21-2007, 01:58 PM	#41
Come Back to NY Making lotsa $$$ off obama's stupidity... Jets Insider VIP JetsInsider.com Legend Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 31,407	[QUOTE=Jetdawgg;2222025]Not really. The republican senate has vetoed a lot of the bills or in the very least supported the Bush doctrine. It is unsustainable and will cease very soon. There are a lot of republicans giving up their seats before the next election and the American people still want change. We will get it.[/QUOTE] blah-blah-blah-blah.... the usual BS from the lunatic left who waved the pom-poms last year yet won't admit what a failure they have been based on the agenda they were elected for....

11-21-2007, 02:21 PM	#42
Phoenixx Hall Of Fame Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Fairfield County, CT Posts: 6,870	[QUOTE=Jetdawgg;2222025]Not really. The republican senate has vetoed a lot of the bills [/QUOTE] The Senate can't veto a bill. Civics 101.

11-21-2007, 02:41 PM	#43
Jetdawgg All Pro Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 6,687	[QUOTE=Phoenixx;2222077]The Senate can't veto a bill. Civics 101.[/QUOTE] Blocked passage. My bad

11-21-2007, 02:51 PM	#44
jets5ever Hall Of Fame Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Boston Posts: 11,692	[QUOTE=bitonti;2222033]this sounds like just another day in washington but there is a small chance McClellan's book provides the opening for a Bush impeachment.[/QUOTE] Uh, yeah, you're crazy.

11-21-2007, 02:59 PM	#45
bitonti searching Hall Of Fame Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Philly Posts: 38,786	[QUOTE=jets5ever;2222133]Uh, yeah, you're crazy.[/QUOTE] why's that, cause your boy Bush is doing such a bang up job?

11-21-2007, 03:05 PM	#46
chicadeel All Pro Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,234	That didn't take too long. Publisher: McClellan doesn't believe Bush lied Spokesman 'did not intend to suggest' the president purposely misled him McClellan didn't intend to suggest Bush lied Nov. 21: Scott McClellan's publisher says the president's former spokesman does not believe the president lied to him about the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame. NBC's Jeannie Ohm reports. MSNBC News Services updated 2:52 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2007 WASHINGTON - Former White House spokesman Scott McClellan does not believe President Bush lied to him about the role of White House aides I. Lewis Scooter Libby or Karl Rove in the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity, according to McClellan's publisher. Peter Osnos, the founder and editor-in-chief of Public Affairs Books, which is publishing McClellan's book in April, tells NBC from his Connecticut home that McCLellan, "Did not intend to suggest Bush lied to him." Osnos says when McClellan went before the White House press corps in 2003 to publicly exonerate Libby and Rove, the problem was that his statement was not true. Osnos said the president told McClellan what "he thought to be the case." But, he says, McClellan believes, "the president didn't know it was not true."

11-21-2007, 03:18 PM	#47
sec.101row23 All Pro Join Date: May 2005 Location: Mendham, NJ Posts: 7,845	Sounds like the publisher is trying to drum up some publicity and thats it.

11-21-2007, 03:30 PM	#48
sackdance All Pro Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 5,882	[QUOTE=sec.101row23;2222174]Sounds like the publisher is trying to drum up some publicity and thats it.[/QUOTE] Tough luck, the bombshell is out of its cage. And electrifying the electorate.

11-21-2007, 08:25 PM	#50
Warfish JetsInsider.com Legend Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 35,000	Left Wing Radio Pearl of Wisdom for Today: From the Randi Rhodes Show (Guest Host Today).......paraphrased, of course. "Well, it is certainly odd that McClelland and his publisher would release this blurb so early, since his book doesn't come out till April. And the reason may be to save his own life. It's well known that the criminal Bush Administration has murdered people to protect it's secrets on a number of occasions. I think McClelland may have released this blurb so early, because he knew that if the Bush Administration found out he was going to write this, they would have him killed for such a revelation".

11-21-2007, 08:36 PM	#51
Come Back to NY Making lotsa $$$ off obama's stupidity... Jets Insider VIP JetsInsider.com Legend Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 31,407	[QUOTE=Warfish;2222615]Left Wing Radio Pearl of Wisdom for Today: From the Randi Rhodes Show (Guest Host Today).......paraphrased, of course. "Well, it is certainly odd that McClelland and his publisher would release this blurb so early, since his book doesn't come out till April. And the reason may be to save his own life. It's well known that the criminal Bush Administration has murdered people to protect it's secrets on a number of occasions. I think McClelland may have released this blurb so early, because he knew that if the Bush Administration found out he was going to write this, they would have him killed for such a revelation".[/QUOTE] I'll do you one better... about 7PM tonight I am driving home listening to the evening news on the car radio, 880 CBS....they are continuing with the headline that "former PS Scott McLellan blamed GWB for leaking the names of a CIA agent"..... you expect that sh!t from a mindless moron like randi rodent...

11-21-2007, 09:07 PM	#52
sackdance All Pro Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 5,882	[QUOTE=cr726;2220339]Not one post from the typical rightwing posters will acknowledge the topic.[/QUOTE] Moooooooooo!

11-21-2007, 10:45 PM	#53
HDCentStOhio longing for the days of Ronald Reagan Hall Of Fame Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Long Island & Section 337 Posts: 4,859	[QUOTE=Warfish;2222615]Left Wing Radio Pearl of Wisdom for Today: From the Randi Rhodes Show (Guest Host Today).......paraphrased, of course. "Well, it is certainly odd that McClelland and his publisher would release this blurb so early, since his book doesn't come out till April. And the reason may be to save his own life. It's well known that the criminal Bush Administration has murdered people to protect it's secrets on a number of occasions. I think McClelland may have released this blurb so early, because he knew that if the Bush Administration found out he was going to write this, they would have him killed for such a revelation".[/QUOTE] I think she is confusing the Bush Administration with the Clinton Administration. Just ask Vince Foster.

11-27-2007, 09:45 PM	#54
Golferjet Rookie Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 99	BTW...What ever happened to the massive stockpile of Iraqi WMD's that Colin Powell described in such great detail to the UN Security Council in February 2003? Anyone...Anyone...Bueller?

11-28-2007, 12:50 PM	#55
Jetdawgg All Pro Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 6,687	[QUOTE=Golferjet;2232842]BTW...What ever happened to the massive stockpile of Iraqi WMD's that Colin Powell described in such great detail to the UN Security Council in February 2003? Anyone...Anyone...Bueller?[/QUOTE] See when they could not find any WMD, the story became Iraq slammed into the WTC.....

11-28-2007, 01:46 PM	#56
Warfish JetsInsider.com Legend Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 35,000	[QUOTE=Jetdawgg;2233753]See when they could not find any WMD, the story became Iraq slammed into the WTC.....[/QUOTE] Thats funny, I don't remember hearing it that way. Care to provide the quotation where Bush says, in no uncertain terms, that Iraq/Saddam Hussain was the planner, organizer and staffer for the 9/11 attacks? Thanks.

11-28-2007, 02:55 PM	#57
Jetdawgg All Pro Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 6,687	[QUOTE=Warfish;2233906]Thats funny, I don't remember hearing it that way. Care to provide the quotation where Bush says, in no uncertain terms, that Iraq/Saddam Hussain was the planner, organizer and staffer for the 9/11 attacks? Thanks.[/QUOTE] Here we go again: [url]http://crazyeye.newsvine.com/_news/2007/07/12/833822-bush-claims-iraqi-insurgants-the-ones-who-attacked-us-on-911[/url] [url]http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/03/13/MNG7UOK2D61.DTL[/url] [url]http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2003/09/16/cheney_link_of_iraq_911_challenged/[/url] [url]http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/093003C.shtml[/url] [url]http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?pid=120112[/url] [url]http://www.bushlies.net/[/url] I hope that this helps....