Bollinger & Ray as backups - Page 2 - Jets Insider.com Forums

Jman21 · 05-04-2004, 11:24 AM

[quote][i]Originally posted by Maxman+May 4 2004, 10:16 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Maxman @ May 4 2004, 10:16 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--shuler82[/i]@May 3 2004, 08:22 PM
[b] all i have to say is that if chad goes down, we're looking at 1999 all over again [/b][/quote]
2003 was different how? We had a veteran backup in 2003. [/b][/quote]
In 99 we had a D that kept us in games.

chiefst2000 · 05-04-2004, 11:29 AM

I'm ok with Ricky Ray as a backup. The weird thing is that Herm keeps calling Brooks Bolinger the #2 and Ray the #3. He's got to flip that around. BB was a waste of a sixth round pick.

faba · 05-04-2004, 11:34 AM

I never saw Ray play being in the CFL but the scouting reports I have read and the fact he was able to lead his team to Grey Cup in Canada I am positive about him.
Bollinger is a rookie still-no live meaningful experience unless you count exhibition games last year.-Herm I hope is just giving a line when he says he is number 2

Savage69 · 05-04-2004, 11:37 AM

[quote][i]Originally posted by Jman21[/i]@May 4 2004, 11:24 AM
[b]In 99 we had a D that kept us in games.[/b][/quote]
Doesn't change the Fact that Ray was 6-3 and scored more points
than the Vet!! Ray had 14 tds with 6 picks and the second to the
last Game beat Miami 38-31..Nice Jet D in that one!! ;)

pope · 05-04-2004, 11:40 AM

[quote][i]Originally posted by Greenwithin+May 3 2004, 08:22 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Greenwithin @ May 3 2004, 08:22 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--pope[/i]@May 3 2004, 08:19 PM
[b] no [/b][/quote]
Thank you for the decisive answer. Care to elaborate on why "no"? [/b][/quote]
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, that's why.

Savage69 · 05-04-2004, 11:51 AM

[quote][i]Originally posted by chiefst2000[/i]@May 4 2004, 11:29 AM
[b]I'm ok with Ricky Ray as a backup. The weird thing is that Herm keeps calling Brooks Bolinger the #2 and Ray the #3. He's got to flip that around. BB was a waste of a sixth round pick.[/b][/quote]
I can explain that Chief .. Look at Brooks Bolingers Initals BB..
Now does that BB answer your Q__uestion?? :lol:

Tailgater · 05-04-2004, 12:28 PM

[quote][i]Originally posted by Maxman+May 4 2004, 10:16 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Maxman @ May 4 2004, 10:16 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--shuler82[/i]@May 3 2004, 08:22 PM
[b] all i have to say is that if chad goes down, we're looking at 1999 all over again [/b][/quote]
2003 was different how? We had a veteran backup in 2003. [/b][/quote]
A vet who got close to zero snaps the prior 9 months, and little to no snaps in the preseason. How was he supposed to look early in the season?

05-05-2004, 10:08 AM

[quote][i]Originally posted by Tailgater+May 4 2004, 12:28 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Tailgater @ May 4 2004, 12:28 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> [quote]Originally posted by -Maxman@May 4 2004, 10:16 AM
[b] <!--QuoteBegin--shuler82[/i]@May 3 2004, 08:22 PM
[b] all i have to say is that if chad goes down, we're looking at 1999 all over again [/b][/quote]
2003 was different how? We had a veteran backup in 2003. [/b][/quote]
A vet who got close to zero snaps the prior 9 months, and little to no snaps in the preseason. How was he supposed to look early in the season? [/b][/quote]
My point is...it couldn't be much worse with young kids then it was last year. 6 and 10 can be achieved by both old and young.

05-04-2004, 11:24 AM	#21
Jman21 Veteran Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 1,773	[quote][i]Originally posted by Maxman+May 4 2004, 10:16 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Maxman @ May 4 2004, 10:16 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--shuler82[/i]@May 3 2004, 08:22 PM [b] all i have to say is that if chad goes down, we're looking at 1999 all over again [/b][/quote] 2003 was different how? We had a veteran backup in 2003. [/b][/quote] In 99 we had a D that kept us in games.

05-04-2004, 11:29 AM	#22
chiefst2000 Champion of Common Sense All Pro Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,837	I'm ok with Ricky Ray as a backup. The weird thing is that Herm keeps calling Brooks Bolinger the #2 and Ray the #3. He's got to flip that around. BB was a waste of a sixth round pick.

05-04-2004, 11:34 AM	#23
faba All League Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Holmdel Posts: 2,850	I never saw Ray play being in the CFL but the scouting reports I have read and the fact he was able to lead his team to Grey Cup in Canada I am positive about him. Bollinger is a rookie still-no live meaningful experience unless you count exhibition games last year.-Herm I hope is just giving a line when he says he is number 2

05-04-2004, 11:37 AM	#24
Savage69 Jets Insider VIP Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 39,295	[quote][i]Originally posted by Jman21[/i]@May 4 2004, 11:24 AM [b]In 99 we had a D that kept us in games.[/b][/quote] Doesn't change the Fact that Ray was 6-3 and scored more points than the Vet!! Ray had 14 tds with 6 picks and the second to the last Game beat Miami 38-31..Nice Jet D in that one!! ;)

05-04-2004, 11:40 AM	#25
pope Hall Of Fame Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 5,979	[quote][i]Originally posted by Greenwithin+May 3 2004, 08:22 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Greenwithin @ May 3 2004, 08:22 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--pope[/i]@May 3 2004, 08:19 PM [b] no [/b][/quote] Thank you for the decisive answer. Care to elaborate on why "no"? [/b][/quote] $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, that's why.

05-04-2004, 11:51 AM	#26
Savage69 Jets Insider VIP Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 39,295	[quote][i]Originally posted by chiefst2000[/i]@May 4 2004, 11:29 AM [b]I'm ok with Ricky Ray as a backup. The weird thing is that Herm keeps calling Brooks Bolinger the #2 and Ray the #3. He's got to flip that around. BB was a waste of a sixth round pick.[/b][/quote] I can explain that Chief .. Look at Brooks Bolingers Initals BB.. Now does that BB answer your Q__uestion?? :lol:

05-04-2004, 12:28 PM	#27
Tailgater Hall Of Fame Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,436	[quote][i]Originally posted by Maxman+May 4 2004, 10:16 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Maxman @ May 4 2004, 10:16 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--shuler82[/i]@May 3 2004, 08:22 PM [b] all i have to say is that if chad goes down, we're looking at 1999 all over again [/b][/quote] 2003 was different how? We had a veteran backup in 2003. [/b][/quote] A vet who got close to zero snaps the prior 9 months, and little to no snaps in the preseason. How was he supposed to look early in the season?

05-05-2004, 10:08 AM	#28
Maxman Edit Status Guest Posts: n/a	[quote][i]Originally posted by Tailgater+May 4 2004, 12:28 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Tailgater @ May 4 2004, 12:28 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> [quote]Originally posted by -Maxman@May 4 2004, 10:16 AM [b] <!--QuoteBegin--shuler82[/i]@May 3 2004, 08:22 PM [b] all i have to say is that if chad goes down, we're looking at 1999 all over again [/b][/quote] 2003 was different how? We had a veteran backup in 2003. [/b][/quote] A vet who got close to zero snaps the prior 9 months, and little to no snaps in the preseason. How was he supposed to look early in the season? [/b][/quote] My point is...it couldn't be much worse with young kids then it was last year. 6 and 10 can be achieved by both old and young.