Browns working deal with Rams??? - Jets Insider.com Forums

BigBensAngel7 · 04-15-2010, 12:19 PM

Per Adam Schefter twitter:

Browns have talked to St. Louis about trading up to No. 1 to get QB Sam Bradford

LockeJET · 04-15-2010, 12:25 PM

It will take more to get from 5 to 1 then what they got from the Jets coming up a bunch more slots..

augustiniak · 04-15-2010, 12:27 PM

don't the browns have a lot of picks?

maybe the browns can give them kenyon coleman and elam?

Dimitri_0515 · 04-15-2010, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBensAngel7

Per Adam Schefter twitter:

Browns have talked to St. Louis about trading up to No. 1 to get QB Sam Bradford

Please change your sig.

SMC · 04-15-2010, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBensAngel7

Per Adam Schefter twitter:

Browns have talked to St. Louis about trading up to No. 1 to get QB Sam Bradford

They should have just drafted Sanchez last year.

He'd be cheaper and a better option.

petejet · 04-15-2010, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dimitri_0515

Please change your sig.

The ACLU reference? I kind of like it.

PaPZ187 · 04-15-2010, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBensAngel7

Per Adam Schefter twitter:

Browns have talked to St. Louis about trading up to No. 1 to get QB Sam Bradford

They wouldnt of had this problem if they stayed at number 5 last year and took our franchise QB Sanchez.

Well atleast they got Ratty, Coleman and Elam

but its going to take ALOT more than that and a second rounder to trade up to number 1 this year!

C Mart · 04-15-2010, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by augustiniak

don't the browns have a lot of picks?

maybe the browns can give them kenyon coleman and elam?

Rams will want Rattlif or no deal..lol

BigBensAngel7 · 04-15-2010, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petejet

The ACLU reference? I kind of like it.

thank you..l

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dimitri_0515

Please change your sig.

why? i love it

124 · 04-15-2010, 12:58 PM

Not shocking.

Jake Delhomme is not a long term answer due to his age, and Seneca Wallace is not a starting QB in this league. St. Louis could use the extra picks. They have more holes than Cleveland.

BigBensAngel7 · 04-15-2010, 01:02 PM

Quote:

They wouldnt of had this problem if they stayed at number 5 last year and took our franchise QB Sanchez

they thought they had their franchise QB in Quinn.

Revi$_I$l@nd · 04-15-2010, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petejet

The ACLU reference? I kind of like it.

Yeah, that's what he wanted changed

Seriously, no one wants to see Sidney and his little man boobs.

petejet · 04-15-2010, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revi$_I$l@nd

Yeah, that's what he wanted changed

Seriously, no one wants to see Sidney and his little man boobs.

I really paid it no mind. Maybe its just me but I am not prone to focusing on pics of half naked men.

hatnlvr · 04-15-2010, 01:41 PM

If the Browns trade up to get Stafford this would have a huge ripple effect in the draft. I'm still keeping my fingers crossed that the Jets make a move for a big play FS (notably Berry).

Roger Vick · 04-15-2010, 01:43 PM

The Rams and Browns, please.

BigBensAngel7 · 04-15-2010, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petejet

I really paid it no mind. Maybe its just me but I am not prone to focusing on pics of half naked men.

now if it was a pic of a half naked woman, that would be a different story right pete?

bitonti · 04-15-2010, 01:49 PM

according to the trade value chart, #1 is worth double of #7. It will take their first, second and they'd still be a thousand points short. this is a scenario where they'd have to trade a future first or possibly some player of value (if Cleveland has any1 of value)

petejet · 04-15-2010, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBensAngel7

now if it was a pic of a half naked woman, that would be a different story right pete?

I might still be stuck on such a thread.

RageATL · 04-15-2010, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitonti

according to the trade value chart, #1 is worth double of #7. It will take their first, second and they'd still be a thousand points short. this is a scenario where they'd have to trade a future first or possibly some player of value (if Cleveland has any1 of value)

They don't, we already traded them for him.

BigBensAngel7 · 04-15-2010, 01:51 PM

i dont think the rams will make this trade. they need a franchise qb and someone that will get people into the stadium.

04-15-2010, 12:19 PM	#1
BigBensAngel7 the Seductive Temptress Hall Of Fame Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: home of the hot guy in my avatar.. oh baby! Posts: 4,462	Browns working deal with Rams??? Per Adam Schefter twitter: Browns have talked to St. Louis about trading up to No. 1 to get QB Sam Bradford

04-15-2010, 12:25 PM	#2
LockeJET pooping, but thinking of you! Hall of Fame Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 15,960	It will take more to get from 5 to 1 then what they got from the Jets coming up a bunch more slots..

04-15-2010, 12:27 PM	#3
augustiniak All Pro Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 8,122	don't the browns have a lot of picks? maybe the browns can give them kenyon coleman and elam?

04-15-2010, 12:58 PM	#10
124 There's NO reason to delay the process. Start Geno Smith. All Pro Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 7,973	Not shocking. Jake Delhomme is not a long term answer due to his age, and Seneca Wallace is not a starting QB in this league. St. Louis could use the extra picks. They have more holes than Cleveland.

04-15-2010, 01:41 PM	#14
hatnlvr Jets Fan for Life! All Pro Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 5,267	If the Browns trade up to get Stafford this would have a huge ripple effect in the draft. I'm still keeping my fingers crossed that the Jets make a move for a big play FS (notably Berry).

04-15-2010, 01:43 PM	#15
Roger Vick Banned Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 9,533	The Rams and Browns, please.

04-15-2010, 01:49 PM	#17
bitonti searching Hall Of Fame Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Philly Posts: 38,786	according to the trade value chart, #1 is worth double of #7. It will take their first, second and they'd still be a thousand points short. this is a scenario where they'd have to trade a future first or possibly some player of value (if Cleveland has any1 of value)

04-15-2010, 01:51 PM	#20
BigBensAngel7 the Seductive Temptress Hall Of Fame Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: home of the hot guy in my avatar.. oh baby! Posts: 4,462	i dont think the rams will make this trade. they need a franchise qb and someone that will get people into the stadium.