|
![]() |
|||||||
| JetsInsider Draft Forum A forum to discuss all subjects related to the NY Jets and the NFL Draft. Post all of your mock drafts and predictions here. For more detailed info please go to our sister site, www.draftinsider.net! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 11,370
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
JI's own Reverend Jim.
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
Posts: 23,508
|
Pats have been stockpiling draft picks for years. Meanwhile they haven't won a playoff game in three years - Brady's prime years I should add.
But they are going to be fantastic in 2019. Last edited by Timmy®; 07-18-2011 at 11:02 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 231
|
Quote:
It is what it is I guess. I'm not going to argue with you over the semantics of trading down. If trading down 5-10 spots in a round to target a specific guy where you think their value is (and incidentally picking up later picks) is your idea of bad business then I'm not going to change your mind (except to not that the practical effect of this, as between the Jets and Pats, is every Kyle Wilson is McCourty and Gronkowski, every Wilkerson is Solder and Dowling, and so on as long as the Patriots continue this). I will take the Pat's outlook the next 5 years over the Jet's any day of the week. The Jets have not exactly been solid drafters the last 2-3 seasons- most of you still hang your hat on Revis, Harris, Ferguson, and Mangold. This is old news. What about Gholston, Wilson, Ducasse, and dare I mention Sanchez?? Everything the Jets have accomplished has been DESPITE Sanchez- with a fantastic offensive line, defense, and gimmick wild cat and misdirection plays to cover for his liabilities. Fine player but I am pretty confident in saying that he will never be a pro-bowler or reach a level of play worthy of where he was picked. Bottomline- in my opinion the Jets success the last two seasons is the perfect storm of outstanding drafting 2005-2007, splurging in free agency on guys like Pace and Scott, and trading for very talented yet unwanted guys on the back end of their inexpensive rookie deals. Unfortunately this window is closed. The Jets might get lucky with the new CBA cutting out "dead money" (if it doesn't then I think this goes without saying that the Jets are royally f*cked), but even if it doesn't there is no way the Jets can keep all these players without royally screwing themselves 2-3 years down the road. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Snubbed a man just to watch him cry.
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 15,792
|
Quote:
they are very likely going to remain competitive even as Brady starts to decline, but the price of doing that was letting some of his prime years go to waste. when you have one of the best QB's of all time, it makes no sense to prepare for 'life after Brady.' they should've been cashing in on all their assets and strengthening their current core to chase as many SB's as possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 231
|
Quote:
Ok well lets here some things the Patriots did that really constitutes wasting Brady's prime. You keep talking like they are trading top 10 picks for a continuous flow of second and third rounders. What is it? Trading back to grab McCourty instead of taking Dez Bryant? Trading a third round pick last year for a second rounder this year- passing up the chance to draft Everson Griffen? Mel Kiper's best pass rusher!! Oh I know- moving back about 6 spots last year to get Cunningham when they could have moved up and had Sergio Kindle!! Mel Kiper had Kindle ranked as a first rounder!!! How could they pass on Clay Matthews?? Everyone knew he was going to be awesome. I am so glad the Jets drafted an elite franchise type quarterback instead!! Who cares that we have to cover for him with wildcat plays and trick misdirection plays for half our offensive snaps- Mark's personality is perfect for NY!!! What makes this even more idiotic is that the Patriots have had some pretty good success- outside of Suh and Bradford (on par with Haden, Earl Thomas, and Berry) I don't think there are any players from last year's draft that look more promising than McCourty and Gronkowski. Vollmer, a late second round pick is generally regarded as the best tackle out of last years draft (see AP second team all pro designation this year). All of this shows there are no sure things in the draft- you do your homework, identify guys that fit your system, and hedge your bets. You don't need a top 10 pick to get pro bowlers, nor does having a top 10 pick guarantee an all pro (or even a career sack). Last edited by BFfan; 07-18-2011 at 08:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Coming Soon to an Ignore List near You!
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,273
|
Quote:
Last edited by GronkWelkhead; 07-18-2011 at 09:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Snubbed a man just to watch him cry.
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 15,792
|
we obviously have differing views on the subject, and nothing you or i say will change that.
i just think that the Pats* would've been better served to cash in on all of those "assets" to improve their core and stay in the hunt for a SB, rather than focus on rebuilding by continuously trading back and into next year so that they have more and more picks. they've remained competitive because they have a top 5 QB of all time and the best coach in the business today, but that has only served them right in the regular season and their weaknesses have been exposed in the playoffs. as a Jets fan, i'm totally fine with this. let them continue to rebuild while Tom Brady gets older. i'm in no rush to see the Pats* win a SB
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Coming Soon to an Ignore List near You!
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,273
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Snubbed a man just to watch him cry.
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 15,792
|
Quote:
regular season stats are teh awesome!! you sound like a Chad Pennington fan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Coming Soon to an Ignore List near You!
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,273
|
Lol. I'm surprised you use the familiar Jets fan's response. Contrary to Jet-popular belief, regular season records DO count for something. Your team backed into the playoffs in '09. No denying that. Next time you may not be so lucky. Granted, you had two good wins in the playoffs, but your QB's miserable performance in the reg. season might have cost you big time. And what would a home playoff game, or two, have done for you last year? Yes, the Pats lost when it counted most. But don't go claiming that the season matters not like it's your God-given right to get to the playoffs every year no matter how crappy a reg. season you have. EVERY team's first priority should be to win the division. Then take it from there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 231
|
Quote:
The problem is that it's hard to really respect your opinion when you cannot point to one concrete example of a move that amounted to "wasting Brady's prime" aside from trading a mid third round pick last year. Instead you keep talking in general terms about "moving back" and not "cashing in assets," as if trading back 6-7 spots within a round to target a specific player somehow cost them the playoffs last year. As weak as this argument is, it's not exactly bolstered by the fact that no team in the league has come away with more impact players in the draft the last two years. But I guess your point is that they could have done better, for instance maybe trading half a draft to "cash in" all their assets to grab one of Mel Kiper's top ten players in last years draft? (maybe two of which I would take over McCourty). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Counting the days until Mark Sanchez is benched...
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,843
|
A few points.
1- The Patriots do this every year--It has nothing to do with the rookie wage scale. If this was the first year-fine I would agree. But they have been doing this for awhile. 2-The scale starts this year and boy they needed defensive players. So they could have saved a ton of money, and def players arrive much earlier then offensive IMO. 3-I think the Patriots are not that good at drafting anymore. Alot of their guys are over hyped based on being patriots. As a Jet Fan I could not be happier with the Patriots draft. I can say Ive been very happy about their drafts for awhile now. Its crazy that we out draft them every year now..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Counting the days until Mark Sanchez is benched...
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,843
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Not a SOJF
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 13,834
|
Quote:
Well said When Pioli left, so did the only real talent they had in the front office. The media every year jerks off over the Patriot draft, and they have had like 1 good draft in 5 years. They had a chance to hit a homerun in this draft with the players on the board when they did pick, or even move up in the draft to get real players they could have built that team around. I'm ecstatic they went after reach after reach, and watching patsfans.com blow up with the motherload of "we drafted who? WTF?" ... was pure comedy, almost as good as trashing that media overhyped team in the playoffs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 231
|
Quote:
Outside of maybe the Packers, how many teams have had more success in the draft than the Patriots since 2008-2009. I am hard pressed to think of any team that has brought in anyone that can match the likes of Mayo (all pro), McCourty (pro-bowl), Vollmer (second team AP all pro), and guys who look primed for very promising careers in Chung, Gronkowski, and Hernandez. Last edited by BFfan; 07-23-2011 at 10:19 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | ||
|
Money now -- and a lot more when I get into that
office. You can take that to the bank.
All League
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,030
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| another tanny bust®, bb = satan |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|