We'll sweep the Pats this year... - Page 2 - Jets Insider.com Forums

NY's stepchild · 07-23-2012, 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jetlifer

When was the last time the Jets swept the Pats?

We won two out of three in 2010 didn't we? No we probably won't sweep them, but I'd rather win in the playoffs.

NY's stepchild · 07-23-2012, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob0729

Take away Brady and Gronk and they don't scare anyone?!?

What if you take away Sanchez and Keller? Well, the Jets will probably be fine in that scenario. But imagine if the Jets had a good QB and they took him away.

Well that is the point. If Sanchez develops now that Shotty is gone we'll be a hell of a team. Even without him we're still good. When Brady retires you'll be back to the same old Pats with the big empty stadium.

Rob0729 · 07-23-2012, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NY's stepchild

Well that is the point. If Sanchez develops now that Shotty is gone we'll be a hell of a team. Even without him we're still good. When Brady retires you'll be back to the same old Pats with the big empty stadium.

The Pats have sold out every game since 1993. Also, they went to a Super Bowl in the 1996 season. Nice try though.

Of course there is a chance after Brady is gone, the Pats have a chance of turning into the Jets - mostly mediocre to bad year after year with a few good seasons here and there.

PatsFanTX · 07-23-2012, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jetlifer

When was the last time the Jets swept the Pats?

12 years ago.

124 · 07-23-2012, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NY's stepchild

The Jets, oh and the Ravens. Possibly the 49ers.

I'm with you on the Jets and San Francisco, but not Baltimore. Take Ray Rice away from that offense and they're garbage, especially when Tyrod Taylor is in over Joe Flacco. What was Baltimore's record last year when Rice doesn't touch the ball 20+ times a game? 1-3? 0-3? Oofa.

EM31 · 07-23-2012, 08:55 AM

Pats Suck!!!!

It had to be said.

And Brady takes it in the tail pipe too!

That is understood and probably did not need to be said.

Rob0729 · 07-23-2012, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slikmojet

Pats are cute, but the Jets will be better than them just like they were in 10 and 09 and even in 08 when Favre was healthy.

LOL! Are the Pats cute like you? It is adorable that you point out the Jets were better in 2008 than that Pats with Brady being out that entire season when Favre was healthy. Seriously, without Brady, the Pats should have lost the division by 4-5 games because the Pats are nothing without Brady. The Pats were the first team in 20 years to miss the playoffs with 11 wins because the Jets couldn't take care of business and beat the Dolphins for a chance to get the Wild Card.

Austin · 07-23-2012, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jetlifer

When was the last time the Jets swept the Pats?

98, I think.

We've split 4 of the last 6 years (which is reasonably competitive considering they've consistently been a league power) but it's a bold prediction to say we'll sweep them. I'd love it, but it's not likely.

Don't get the OP either -- why would we take away their two best players?

If you take away Brick and Mangold we're capable of getting shut out -- if you take away Revis and Cromartie, our elite secondary becomes pedestrian.

But all six guys are playing, so what difference does that make.

Austin · 07-23-2012, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob0729

Of course there is a chance after Brady is gone, the Pats have a chance of turning into the Jets - mostly mediocre to bad year after year with a few good seasons here and there.

I beg to differ. Jets have had mostly medicore to good years with a few terrible seasons here and there (in recent memory anyway.)

Since 1997: 10 winning seasons, 2 .500 seaons, 3 losing seasons.

It just doesn't seem like it because most of our winning seasons are 9 or 10 wins.

Ray Ray19 · 07-23-2012, 09:10 AM

Absolutely nailed it.

The Pats are an average team without Brady.

This could very well be the year the 36 yr old Brady starts to break down, he already has a bum shoulder and his elbow have been issues the past couple of years.

Jetdawgg · 07-23-2012, 09:11 AM

The draft showed me that they are very concerned about the 'D'.

PatsFanTX · 07-23-2012, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slikmojet

Take away Brady and Gronk and that team scares no one. Jets are more talented all around.

Preseason Power Rankings No. 18: New York Jets

There are so many things that can go wrong for the Jets this season, from dysfunction in the locker room to Landry getting hurt to the lack of a consistent edge rusher, that it is hard to feel too bullish about their chances of pulling it off. It doesn’t help that there’s so much uncertainty at quarterback and early struggles for Sanchez will send the team directly into a full-blown quarterback controversy.

We should know what we’re getting from the Jets pretty early in the season. Four of the first six games are at home, providing some comfort amid early matchups with the Steelers, 49ers, Texans and Patriots that will test the offense’s ability to move the ball well enough to win games. If the Jets don’t handle the early stretch, the second half will almost certainly be full of questions about how much longer Ryan will be in charge.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...new-york-jets/

PatsFanTX · 07-23-2012, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray Ray19

This could very well be the year the 36 yr old Brady starts to break down, he already has a bum shoulder and his elbow have been issues the past couple of years.

Other than your optomistic homerisim, what facts prove that Brady will begin to "breakdown"?

In case you missed it, last season he threw for over 5,000 yards, 40 TD's and yet another Super Bowl appearance.

Ray Ray19 · 07-23-2012, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsFanTX

Other than your optomistic homerisim, what facts prove that Brady will begin to "breakdown"?

In case you missed it, last season he threw for over 5,000 yards, 40 TD's and yet another Super Bowl appearance.

What is the over/under on the number of days this jackass troll gets banned again?

NY's stepchild · 07-23-2012, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob0729

The Pats have sold out every game since 1993. Also, they went to a Super Bowl in the 1996 season. Nice try though.

Of course there is a chance after Brady is gone, the Pats have a chance of turning into the Jets - mostly mediocre to bad year after year with a few good seasons here and there.

Is that the year Parcells took over? Well when Brady goes, and little Bill goes with him you'll be right back to wearing bags on your heads. This stadium, I believe is a lot bigger than the old one.

NY's stepchild · 07-23-2012, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsFanTX

Preseason Power Rankings No. 18: New York Jets

There are so many things that can go wrong for the Jets this season, from dysfunction in the locker room to Landry getting hurt to the lack of a consistent edge rusher, that it is hard to feel too bullish about their chances of pulling it off. It doesn’t help that there’s so much uncertainty at quarterback and early struggles for Sanchez will send the team directly into a full-blown quarterback controversy.

We should know what we’re getting from the Jets pretty early in the season. Four of the first six games are at home, providing some comfort amid early matchups with the Steelers, 49ers, Texans and Patriots that will test the offense’s ability to move the ball well enough to win games. If the Jets don’t handle the early stretch, the second half will almost certainly be full of questions about how much longer Ryan will be in charge.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...new-york-jets/

Who wrote this? You should have stopped reading after the uncertainty at QB part. That's someone that knows nothing about football, or has an agenda, like you.

PatsFanTX · 07-23-2012, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NY's stepchild

Who wrote this? You should have stopped reading after the uncertainty at QB part. That's someone that knows nothing about football, or has an agenda, like you.

I provided the link for the article.

90% of the national media have the Jets between 15th-25th this year.

And you seriously don't think there is "uncertainty" at QB position? Have you read the papers since Tebow got there?

NY's stepchild · 07-23-2012, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsFanTX

I provided the link for the article.

90% of the national media have the Jets between 15th-25th this year.

And you seriously don't think there is "uncertainty" at QB position? Have you read the papers since Tebow got there?

I also read that the Pats were a lock to go 19-0. You know damn well Tebow is no QB. He's here for the wildcat, and to push Sanchez. If Mark doesn't step up this year, we'll look for a new QB next year. The media loves a controversy, and so do you.

Ray Ray19 · 07-23-2012, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsFanTX

I provided the link for the article.

90% of the national media have the Jets between 15th-25th this year.

And you seriously don't think there is "uncertainty" at QB position? Have you read the papers since Tebow got there?

Pro football BS.com.

Nice job troll

GetaLife · 07-23-2012, 09:39 AM

If you think the Jets aren't going to win why watch?

If you are 100% sure the Jets are going to lose on any given day why even bother??

It's unlikely they could sweep the Pats.. But you are going to watch anyway and root for them because you think they could win...

So lets go sweep the frigging Pats already...

And lets knock off the Fish and Buffalodeans each while we are at it...

07-23-2012, 08:55 AM	#26
EM31 All Pro Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Oceanside, Long Island Posts: 9,302	Pats Suck!!!! It had to be said. And Brady takes it in the tail pipe too! That is understood and probably did not need to be said.

07-23-2012, 09:10 AM	#30
Ray Ray19 Not a SOJF Hall Of Fame Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 13,954	Absolutely nailed it. The Pats are an average team without Brady. This could very well be the year the 36 yr old Brady starts to break down, he already has a bum shoulder and his elbow have been issues the past couple of years.

07-23-2012, 09:11 AM	#31
Jetdawgg All Pro Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 6,714	The draft showed me that they are very concerned about the 'D'.

07-23-2012, 09:39 AM	#40
GetaLife Rookie Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 756	If you think the Jets aren't going to win why watch? If you are 100% sure the Jets are going to lose on any given day why even bother?? It's unlikely they could sweep the Pats.. But you are going to watch anyway and root for them because you think they could win... So lets go sweep the frigging Pats already... And lets knock off the Fish and Buffalodeans each while we are at it...