|
![]() |
|||||||
| The Landing Strip: All NY Jets and NFL - 24/7 Welcome to the most active NY Jets Messageboard on the internet. Celebrating a decade on the web! Talk about all of your NY Jets and NFL related topics here! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#41 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,306
|
No offense, but $8.25 million for a "QB with upside" is a lot of money. This year, Sanchez would be the 5th highest paid QB in the league (on base salaries) with that salary. Aaron Rodgers is only making $8 million this year in base salary. Tom Brady's total cap hit this year is $8 million ($950k base salary). A guy like Sanchez who a team might think has a chance to be a reclaimation project might be worth taking a risk on at $2-3 million, not over $8 million. That is very good to elite QB pay. Any team who might take a flier on him would need to have another starting quality QB to compete with him and step in if he sucks.
If I was Tannebaum, I would package Sanchez and a third or fourth rounder to any team with tons of cash for a good role player who might turn into a good starter. That is the Jets best chance of unloading Sanchez and his salary. The Jets are likely going to have to pay a team to take him off their hands to free up the cap space. Last edited by Rob0729; 11-13-2012 at 12:11 PM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Counting the days until Mark Sanchez is benched...
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,843
|
Quote:
Someone is surely traded for Sanchez. "He has won playoff games, and has been simply not been handled right by the Jets". "Its not his fault" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
No more expectations
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,277
|
Quote:
Ryan Fitzpatrick is getting like $10M per year. Matt Flynn was signed for 3 years / $20M. Do *I* think Sanchez is worth $8.25M? Heck no. But I think someone else might. (Also patman states that another $4M is guaranteed in 2014. If true, that certainly doesn't help things.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Champion of Common Sense
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,820
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Board Moderator
Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,803
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Liked the draft picks....meat and potatoes.
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 6,512
|
NOTHING could be further from the truth. Smith struggled when he had no talent, that is a given. But he has come into his own and is the epitome of what a West Coast QB is to do. Make accurate throws and not turn the ball over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,306
|
Quote:
Most people now feel that Sanchez is a limited QB who cannot see the field, makes poor decisions, iand easily rattled. I think most of the league believes he is a limited QB who can be a good game manager with an excellent defense and running. At best he is a guy who can put together a great drive here or there, but will never be anything better than an average QB. If any GM trades for Sanchez with his current salary for any draft picks straight up should be immediately fired. That is why no GM is going to do it. If the Jets convert some of his salary to a signing bonus and eat it themselves (getting his base salary down to $4 million or so), then maybe. Maybe if Sanchez is willing to redo his deal with a new team and take a paycut. You guys are dreaming if you think any GM is going to eat a $8 million salary for a guy with a ceiling of being a good game manager. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,306
|
Quote:
Fitzpatrick started last year as one of the league's best QBs and quickly turned to crap after his deal was signed. I think Fitzpatrick was the leading QB in yards the first four weeks last year and had 9 TDs in the first three weeks. He showed a quick flash of being an elite QB and the Bills stupidily gave him a big deal. I already addressed Flynn in my last post. But one thing I did forget to mention is that he got his contract largely due to the fact that he threw for 480 yards and 6 TDs in the last game of the season last year. Sanchez has never had a game remotely close to that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Board Moderator
Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,803
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
I see the 88 to 97 period all over again.
Jets Insider VIP
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 15,689
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Board Moderator
Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,803
|
Quote:
I think the biggest problem with Mangini is that he tried too hard to be Bellichek. He hadn't really experienced much else. But, Bellichek is a unique personality. He's a curmuddgeon but it works for him. He's a salty, arrogant ahole, but that's generally who he is. Plus, he has that dry sense of humor that comes out when you'd least expect it. Mangini, instead of being true to his own personality and develop his own style of leadership (which he should have borrowed SOME from BB), thought that he had to be unnecessarily sneaky and evasive like his mentor. It didn't work for him. On occasion, when his true personality came out, he was a funny, charismatic guy. But his overarching persona was a secretive grouch and, unlike BB, he never earned the right to act like that. And then, when the team collapsed, there was simply no support for him and he went down with that collapsing team. I don't know if Mangini would have drafted Sanchez which then would have changed the trajectory of that entire team, but I think he could have been successful if he stayed on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
happy to be here
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,152
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
happy to be here
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,152
|
Quote:
This is a guy who may never get to play as a starter again in his career, He does not even have the 5 years to be vested into the pension. There is a better chance that a piano falls on him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Lying to the Smithsonian
Board Moderator
Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SF via Strong Island
Posts: 26,638
|
No. It was discussed at the time; Mangenius was exposed for poor coaching decisions. He did expect a lot and was a hell of a disciplinarian; I could miss that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
JI Resident Troll
Banned
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 52,068
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Board Moderator
Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,803
|
Quote:
So, going in to 2013, he has ~$8M coming to him, guaranteed. If the Jets agree to eat $3M perhaps some team will take him. At that point, the Jets are responsible for that $3m (I guess they can structure it as a RB if they want) and whatever prorated portion of his SB is - the new team would be responsible for the $5m plus his contract going forward. I don't think there is any additional guaranteed money there beyond the 2013 salary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
happy to be here
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,152
|
Quote:
Sorry I was confused with the cap hit over the next two years with his salary. Now if we suspend reality for a min we can look at a possible trade that does not cost Sanchez any of his guaranteed money and save the jets cap space. The 8.5 salarY is converted to a 2013 guaranteed roster bonus paid on day 10 of the league year but is full guaranteed if he is traded. The jets trade Sanchez to the Kalamazoo Short Buses for a fifth rd pick on the first day of the league year. The 8 mill of un-amoritzed bonus hits the jets 2013 cap, but since his existing cap hit is 12.8 mil the jets save almost 5 mill from the 2013 cap Saves the jets cap space but the new team is paying Sanchez 8.5 mill plus his min salary for next year. Now if Rex has pictures of that other GM playing with his wife feet??? Last edited by patman; 11-13-2012 at 05:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Board Moderator
Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,803
|
Quote:
On the flip side, Sanchez is effectively on a 1 yr/$5.5 million deal as he is cuttable after 2013. That's obviously high for a backup, but at least a team is getting a QB who has been to the playoffs and, more than anything else, could use a change of scenery. Does that warrant a team to take a gamble on a slightly longer contract to buy some security? Probably not, but its a possibility. Bottom line, I don't think he gets traded, but its not out of the realm of possibility. Having that much dead money hurts for sure, but with sanchez, its not just about money. If they can find a viable alternative, they may simply want/need him off the team. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Rochester, NY--Originally from Long Island
Posts: 776
|
I think the best thing for the Jets is for any QB on the roster right now to fail when given an opportunity. That way we can move on and find the right guy. The only thing any of the backup QB's having success would do is delay the inevitable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Counting the days until Mark Sanchez is benched...
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,843
|
Quote:
Sanchez is done here. It will be tebow, McElroy, a trade or draft pick that everyone will look to be starting for us next year. Mark is going to want to start somewhere. There is surely 1-2 coaches that are arrogant enough to think they can coach him up. That's when mark will be willing to compromise. Chances are he's going to be traded on draft day... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|