Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!
LATEST JI HEADLINES
TOP STORY
New Jets RB Goodson Arrested on Drugs and Weapons
Charges
 
5/16 : Joe McKnight Doesn't Appreciate Questioning His Roster Spot
5/15 : QB Garrard to leave Jets
5/15 : uSTADIUM App Looks to Revolutionize Social Sports Media
5/14 : Idzik's Offensive Game Plan: Depth Along Front Line
Go Back   Jets Insider.com Forums > Main Forums > The Landing Strip: All NY Jets and NFL - 24/7
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

The Landing Strip: All NY Jets and NFL - 24/7 Welcome to the most active NY Jets Messageboard on the internet. Celebrating a decade on the web! Talk about all of your NY Jets and NFL related topics here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2012, 05:04 PM   #1
Warfish
JetsInsider.com Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 35,000
Jets Offense works Best with a 3-RB Attack

Pretty obvious today.

None of the three are good enough or durable enough for a full-time-job.

Combined, they might just be decent enough.

Glad to see, after all this time, the idea might have actualloy sunk into Jets O Coaching.
Warfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 11-18-2012, 05:11 PM   #2
Vin
RE-SIGN ME, DAMMIT!!!
All Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,094
^ We'll see if this is the idea going forward, Warfish, or if this just was a flash-in-the-pan and Rex ignores the obvious(which could happen).
Vin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 05:13 PM   #3
TheBlairThomasFumble
Blames Tanny for 90% of this mess.
Practice Squad
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 439
More McKnight, please.
TheBlairThomasFumble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 05:13 PM   #4
sec.101row23
All Pro
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mendham, NJ
Posts: 7,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warfish View Post
Pretty obvious today.

None of the three are good enough or durable enough for a full-time-job.

Combined, they might just be decent enough.

Glad to see, after all this time, the idea might have actualloy sunk into Jets O Coaching.
I think the two most encouraging plays were the screen pass to Powell and the wheel route to McKnight. Thats a dimension that has been missing from this offense.
sec.101row23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 05:14 PM   #5
LadainianIMnotDONE
All League
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,629
um ... duh. I've been saying this since last year. We haven't had an everydown back since Thomas Jones. I'm shocked its taking this long to utilize McKnight ... and he's still being underused. He's such a threat from the backfield as a receiver and we never use him.
LadainianIMnotDONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 05:14 PM   #6
Green + White
furor teutonicus
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NRW, Germany
Posts: 1,020
More Powell, please.
Green + White is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 05:15 PM   #7
GreenWave
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,401
I'm not optimistic that this is the case, but maybe today turned the light on that the Jets need more Powell/McKnight out of the backfield and less of Tim Momentum-Killer Tebow.
GreenWave is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 05:16 PM   #8
Conkboy
"All Conked Up"
All League
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,525
As long as all three can pass block then I am all for it... In the past we were predictable by our personnel because we have so many one dimensional players... At least McKnight has multiple skill sets...
Conkboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 05:22 PM   #9
Vin
RE-SIGN ME, DAMMIT!!!
All Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,094
Let's see what happens this thursday against NE.


If they go with the 3-RB committee again, the Jets may have a shot.....
Vin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 05:32 PM   #10
crasherino
Board Moderator
Jets Insider VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warfish View Post
Pretty obvious today.

None of the three are good enough or durable enough for a full-time-job.

Combined, they might just be decent enough.

Glad to see, after all this time, the idea might have actualloy sunk into Jets O Coaching.
Agreed, but I'm not sure it's a function of not sinking in as opposed to them rarely being healthy at the same times.
crasherino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 05:34 PM   #11
JetsfanfromtheBURGH
Pirates win 88 games this year. Mark it!
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,128
I thought Powell played nicely when his number was called. I just care about them being prepared when they are in fact called upon.
JetsfanfromtheBURGH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 06:30 PM   #12
Warfish
JetsInsider.com Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 35,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by crasherino View Post
Agreed, but I'm not sure it's a function of not sinking in as opposed to them rarely being healthy at the same times.
Thats certainly been an issue thus far, aye.

And as others have said, I'm not exactly optimistic that the Coaching Staff "gets it" yet that use of all three > running primarily Greene.
Warfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 09:09 PM   #13
Mainejet
impatiently waiting for the Jets to win the SB
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warfish View Post
Pretty obvious today.

None of the three are good enough or durable enough for a full-time-job.

Combined, they might just be decent enough.

Glad to see, after all this time, the idea might have actualloy sunk into Jets O Coaching.
I agree.

They always did well in 2009/2010 with two back approach.

They could still go back to that with Shonn Greene, they just need a workhorse RB that they can give the bulk of the carries to during the regular season. They do not have that workhorse at this moment.

So this is the best approach when you do not have the talent for other, more refined approaches.
Mainejet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 10:23 PM   #14
Peebag
being disappointed since January 13th, 1969
All Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: great midwest -well not so great
Posts: 7,108
What works best with this team is to play other bad teams. We could have a 10 back system and its still not a gonna make a difference....
Peebag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 11:54 PM   #15
Buzzsaw
Jets Insider VIP
Board Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26,297
The running game did look much better today. Powell's not starting caliber but he's a little more shifty than Greene, glad to see that he got more carries than usual.
Buzzsaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 02:35 AM   #16
Scoop24
Up in the clouds somewhere
All League
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: brooklyn,NY
Posts: 4,664
truthfully it looks better with the less carries Greene gets..
Scoop24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 03:03 AM   #17
Demosthenes9
PimpAssedAvatar Thanks McGinley :)
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,290
Running game looked a bit better today, but I think some of it has to do with better play calling. Not as many calls for RB up the middle with straight ahead blocking. There was more kinetic action as dlinemen were being turned or attacked from angles instead of straight ahead.

Doesn't hurt that St. Louis was often running a wide 9 D and Sparano attacked that gap.
Demosthenes9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 03:36 AM   #18
Green + White
furor teutonicus
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NRW, Germany
Posts: 1,020
Keep it real guys and don't forget about the D we faced there.
Green + White is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 03:54 AM   #19
JB1089
Now is the time...
All Pro
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,710
Honestly can't believe what I'm reading.

The running backs produced 120 yards on 39 carries.



It's like the QB that throws for 300 yards........on 50 attempts.



The passing game was efficient. The running game was bad.

We won the game because the defense played an excellent game against a bad offense. A bad offense that they just spent several years practicing against.

The defense not only shutdown the Rams offense, they routinely set the offense up with great field position.
JB1089 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 04:14 AM   #20
Demosthenes9
PimpAssedAvatar Thanks McGinley :)
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB1089 View Post
Honestly can't believe what I'm reading.

The running backs produced 120 yards on 39 carries.



It's like the QB that throws for 300 yards........on 50 attempts.



The passing game was efficient. The running game was bad.

We won the game because the defense played an excellent game against a bad offense. A bad offense that they just spent several years practicing against.

The defense not only shutdown the Rams offense, they routinely set the offense up with great field position.

I agree with your overall conclusion about the game. That said, even with it being against the Rams, there were some very nice moments in the running game. Granted, there was still a lot of the same old ****, but perhaps, just maybe, Sparano might look at what worked and emphasize that a bit more in the future.
Demosthenes9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2013, JetsInsider.com LTD