Is Danny Woodhead better than... - Jets Insider.com Forums

Mogamedogz · 11-24-2012, 07:21 PM

Every single "active" Jets offensive skill position player?

3rd_Times_A_Charm · 11-24-2012, 07:26 PM

Nope, I'd say that Kerley and maybe Keller are better.

InsideBlitz · 11-24-2012, 07:31 PM

Seriously?

cedk · 11-24-2012, 07:31 PM

not at all.

we have had no proper coaching for our offense players.Joe mc night is probably better than woodhead if he was on the pats and many more players.

FF2® · 11-24-2012, 07:33 PM

I have see some Statz®

J.E.T.Sfan4life · 11-24-2012, 07:37 PM

Woodhead! nah!

The Band · 11-24-2012, 07:45 PM

I would have to say yes. How many rings does Woodhead have? Is he better than Joe Namath or Maynard? Probably not. Rules were very different back than, but currently, yes. There is no Jet today that can say they are better.

InsideBlitz · 11-24-2012, 07:53 PM

I know one thing, he's a better QB than Mark Sanchez.

revischrist · 11-24-2012, 08:10 PM

Based on what I read on this board, woodhead should be a hall of famer when his career is over

dameangreenkillingmachine · 11-24-2012, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Band

I would have to say yes. How many rings does Woodhead have? Is he better than Joe Namath or Maynard? Probably not. Rules were very different back than, but currently, yes. There is no Jet today that can say they are better.

woodhead has 0 rings. and you think only 2 guys in the history of the franchise are better?

frankiepapa · 11-24-2012, 08:22 PM

Anyone that plays with future hof qb tom Brady will be better than they are...Bilal Powell might be better for all we know

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

DDNYjets · 11-24-2012, 08:35 PM

Kerley, Keller, Holmes and McKnight are all better than Woodhead.

fullblast · 11-24-2012, 08:38 PM

Kerley would be a beast in New England. McKnight would be much better as well. The Pats know how to get the most out of their players. We know how to get the least.

southparkcpa · 11-24-2012, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3rd_Times_A_Charm

Nope, I'd say that Kerley and maybe Keller are better.

Agreed...... Woodhead should have been a JET but REX knows all.

That said.... McNight also may be better.

Kentucky Jet · 11-24-2012, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fullblast

Kerley would be a beast in New England. McKnight would be much better as well. The Pats know how to get the most out of their players. We know how to get the least.

Agreed. McKnight would be awesome in NE. Belichick knows how to get the most out of his players. Wreck does nothing but talk a good game.

Vinny Testaverde's Niece · 11-24-2012, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kentucky Jet

Agreed. McKnight would be awesome in NE. Belichick knows how to get the most out of his players. Wreck does nothing but talk a good game.

I don't know about McKnight. The coaches have held back on using him; it sounds like they believe him to be practically uncoachable. He doesn't get it on ST for instance continues to make the same boneheaded errors, and still fumbling - why isn't he being bashed for his 'performance' on Thursday here?

CleatMarks · 11-24-2012, 09:44 PM

Woodhead is a ball player.

The thing about him is that when he's asked to step up for the Pats, he produces. That's why he's used in certain situations. BB doesn't ask players to do what they can't do. He puts them into situations to succeed and asks them to produce. If they produce, they're called upon again. If he puts them in a situation to succeed and they fail to produce (drop the ball on a pass, fumble, hesitate), they're gone. He has no patience for lack of consistency. Woodhead has done what he's been asked to do and that's why he's successful on the Pats.

BushyTheBeaver · 11-24-2012, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CleatMarks

Woodhead is a ball player.

The thing about him is that when he's asked to step up for the Pats, he produces. That's why he's used in certain situations. BB doesn't ask players to do what they can't do. He puts them into situations to succeed and asks them to produce. If they produce, they're called upon again. If he puts them in a situation to succeed and they fail to produce (drop the ball on a pass, fumble, hesitate), they're gone. He has no patience for lack of consistency. Woodhead has done what he's been asked to do and that's why he's successful on the Pats.

Also to date he's managed to avoid running headfirst into his O-line's butts.

Jungle Shift Jet · 11-24-2012, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BushyTheBeaver

Also to date he's managed to avoid running headfirst into his O-line's butts.

Yeah, if only that actually happened. Unless we have 8 foot tall linemen.

CleatMarks · 11-24-2012, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BushyTheBeaver

Also to date he's managed to avoid running headfirst into his O-line's butts.

I'm pretty sure that's a skill unique to Sanchez. I'm sure if BB ever needs someone to do that and Sanchez is available, BB will pull the trigger.

View Poll Results: Is Woodhead better than every active Jet skill position player?
Yes	24	32.43%
No	50	67.57%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

11-24-2012, 07:21 PM	#1
Mogamedogz Undrafted Free Agent Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 24	Is Danny Woodhead better than... Every single "active" Jets offensive skill position player?

11-24-2012, 07:26 PM	#2
3rd_Times_A_Charm Practice Squad Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 397	Nope, I'd say that Kerley and maybe Keller are better.

11-24-2012, 07:31 PM	#3
InsideBlitz Veteran Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 162	Seriously?

11-24-2012, 07:31 PM	#4
cedk Practice Squad Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 465	not at all. we have had no proper coaching for our offense players.Joe mc night is probably better than woodhead if he was on the pats and many more players.

11-24-2012, 07:33 PM	#5
FF2® Believes Sloppy Guy was involved JetsInsider.com Legend Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 46,223	I have see some Statz®

11-24-2012, 07:37 PM	#6
J.E.T.Sfan4life rolling with the J.E.T.S jets jets jets Rookie Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: The 5th Dimension Posts: 957	Woodhead! nah!

11-24-2012, 07:45 PM	#7
The Band tired of it all Banned Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 445	I would have to say yes. How many rings does Woodhead have? Is he better than Joe Namath or Maynard? Probably not. Rules were very different back than, but currently, yes. There is no Jet today that can say they are better.

11-24-2012, 07:53 PM	#8
InsideBlitz Veteran Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 162	I know one thing, he's a better QB than Mark Sanchez.

11-24-2012, 08:10 PM	#9
revischrist Dee Best! Veteran Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 1,739	Based on what I read on this board, woodhead should be a hall of famer when his career is over

11-24-2012, 08:22 PM	#11
frankiepapa hopes to bring back braylon and holmes All League Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 3,528	Anyone that plays with future hof qb tom Brady will be better than they are...Bilal Powell might be better for all we know Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

11-24-2012, 08:35 PM	#12
DDNYjets Bye week buh bye Rex Hall Of Fame Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: New York Posts: 12,303	Kerley, Keller, Holmes and McKnight are all better than Woodhead.

11-24-2012, 08:38 PM	#13
fullblast All League Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 3,576	Kerley would be a beast in New England. McKnight would be much better as well. The Pats know how to get the most out of their players. We know how to get the least.

11-24-2012, 09:44 PM	#17
CleatMarks All League Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 2,609	Woodhead is a ball player. The thing about him is that when he's asked to step up for the Pats, he produces. That's why he's used in certain situations. BB doesn't ask players to do what they can't do. He puts them into situations to succeed and asks them to produce. If they produce, they're called upon again. If he puts them in a situation to succeed and they fail to produce (drop the ball on a pass, fumble, hesitate), they're gone. He has no patience for lack of consistency. Woodhead has done what he's been asked to do and that's why he's successful on the Pats.