Tell me ehat Sanchez is GOOD at...seriously

[sdJETSetter]

Doesnt fumble many snaps.

[dvl7]

he IS good at throwing on the run. about it

[Mohegangreen]

His handing off has really improved

[Mohegangreen]

He's excellent at 3 and outs

[ucrenegade]

Originally Posted by johnnysd

Simple thread:

For those that support Sanchez please just tell me what he is actually GOOD at. They way I see it, he is actually poor at almost any objective performance category for QBs.

* among worst in NFL

Accuracy: BAD*
Touch: BAD*

Short passes: Abysmal *** (probably the WORST in NFL and worst I have seen)
Slants: Average
Seam routes: Above Average
Outs: Below Average
Long passes: Below average

Ball protection (pass): BAD*
Ball protection (fumbles): Abysmal*

Field vision: Below average
Pocket presence: Below average
Footwork: Above average but regressing
Escapability: BAD
Running: Average
Reading defense: BAD*

Leadership: Poor
Bounce back ability: Very poor*

2 minute drill: Above average
3rd down passing: Poor
Red Zone: Very bad this year (Good last year so somewhat receiver related)

QB rating : Poor*
QBR: Poor*

So someone please tell me why we should start this guy a 4 year VETERAN over just about anyone else.

he can beat every team that has a losing record by throwing for 100 yds a game and his runners rushing for 175

[ucrenegade]

Originally Posted by SAR I

Mark Sanchez is good when he had playmakers like Edwards, Holmes, Cotchery, Burress, Tomlinson, Richardson, Jones, and Washington.

Mark Sanchez isn't good when he has fap like Schillens, Hill, Kerley, McKnight, Gates, Hilliard, and Greene.

No quarterback could succeed with this group of offensive sh-t.

SAR I

um with those guys he still was ranked 27th or lower......those playmakers made sanchez he did nothing for them

[johnnysd]

Originally Posted by ucrenegade

he can beat every team that has a losing record by throwing for 100 yds a game and his runners rushing for 175

lol...unfortunately we may win out with that philosophy and Tanny will extend him for 5 years $100M

[ucrenegade]

Originally Posted by johnnysd

lol...unfortunately we may win out with that philosophy and Tanny will extend him for 5 years $100M

yep and 50 m guaranteed making him untradeable and uncuttable

[TechJet]

Sanchez is the best, best at turnover the dude is a turnover machine the dude also has fumbleleeah he's a fumble-lieah- his condition is called
fumble-lietis.

[JetsFanatic]

Originally Posted by SAR I

Mark Sanchez is good when he had playmakers like Edwards, Holmes, Cotchery, Burress, Tomlinson, Richardson, Jones, and Washington.

Mark Sanchez isn't good when he has fap like Schillens, Hill, Kerley, McKnight, Gates, Hilliard, and Greene.

No quarterback could succeed with this group of offensive sh-t.

SAR I

Stop being stupid!

The Jets won today on Special teams & defense. I agree Sanchez is compromised with the receivers he has, but its no excuse to be a turnover machine.

BTW, he does have a solid running game to help him out..

[jxc]

Originally Posted by SAR I

Mark Sanchez is good when he had playmakers like Edwards, Holmes, Cotchery, Burress, Tomlinson, Richardson, Jones, and Washington.

Mark Sanchez isn't good when he has fap like Schillens, Hill, Kerley, McKnight, Gates, Hilliard, and Greene.

No quarterback could succeed with this group of offensive sh-t.

SAR I

Could you be a little more specific about what his strengths are?

I really want to see what you see.

Is it accurate throws? Decision making? Arm strength? Leadership? Motivation? Pocket awareness? Rushing?

[boxman]

He was handing that ball off like a champ.

[Ray Ray19]

Originally Posted by Conkboy

He is good at setting the game of football back 40 years...

what a clown!

[JetsFanatic]

Originally Posted by jxc

Could you be a little more specific about what his strengths are?

I really want to see what you see.

Is it accurate throws? Decision making? Arm strength? Leadership? Motivation? Pocket awareness? Rushing?

The fifth pick in the draft should be able to elevate the players around him.

[acepepe]

He's good at locking on receivers and telegraphing his throws. This according to 50% of the DB's in the league.

[Ray Ray19]

Sanchez wasn't particularly good, but he improved from last week.

Let's not just forget how Sanchez played in his first two years. This year has been a disaster in terms of injuries. No Keller again today, Hill goes down, the Jets are now playing Schilens, Kerley, and recently signed off the street Marty Gilyard. Cumberland went down and missed most of the game, Kerley and Hilyard on key 3rd down plays. This has been the problem all year. Inability to run the ball in spots, players dropping balls, key players dropping like flies, or missing time all year long.

Do any of you realize what he had on the field with him today?

Then during the game, you're killing Sanchez and the team because they won't throw the ball. Do you not realize the offense has been completely vanilla lately due to those injuries?

Sanchez is only part of the problem, and he has his role in all of this, but you have to evaluate everything. Sanchez is out there trying to make plays, trying to run an offense that has JAG players around him at all skill position areas. Yeah, Sanchez is forcing plays, not seeing the field well, but how much of this is because of the inconsistencies of the players available to him each week? The Jets are finally healthy at RB, so the running game is picking up and is using the two-headed tandum in Greene and Powell they envisioned to start the year, but this too hasn't been available until recently due to Powell's injuries.

Is Sanchez inaccurate because he has no chemistry with the players on the field, and is trying to make it work on the fly, or has he regressed?

You can make an argument that Sanchez has regressed, but it is all due to these other factors.

This Jets team despite all the crap this year, the media driven agenda, the BS spin about how the Jets are a circus, and they are STILL a team playing hard, and now within 1 game of a playoff birth.

If the Giants lose today, and it certainly is possible against a potent Saints team that is not playing well but can put it together at any time, could drop to 7-6 today, exactly 1 game better than the Jets...

But fans should continue buying the crap the media is selling, some of you are ****ting it out faster than you can eat it!!!! Some of you act as if this is Kotite's 1-15 Jets.

[Sanchez 3:16]

He's good at pissing off the masses on JI... which personally brings me great joy in debating with the miserable folks on here.

[JetsMakeMeCry]

Originally Posted by SAR I

Mark Sanchez is good when he had playmakers like Edwards, Holmes, Cotchery, Burress, Tomlinson, Richardson, Jones, and Washington.

Mark Sanchez isn't good when he has fap like Schillens, Hill, Kerley, McKnight, Gates, Hilliard, and Greene.

No quarterback could succeed with this group of offensive sh-t.

SAR I

this is your story and you're sticking to it. good for you. its completely delusional and wrong but good for you.

we can get an average qb, pay him 1 mil, and he'll throw for 150 yards, have 2 turnovers, lead us to a 8-8 record or 7-9 record but at least he'd complete 60% of his passes!

don't give me that bull about no talent. I agree to an extent but for god sakes, don't miss wide open guys by a mile and then tell me its the lack of talent...

EDIT: btw, our o-line is ranked top 5 this year so don't tell me he doesn't have time to throw

[w0mbat]

Originally Posted by Ray Ray19

Sanchez wasn't particularly good, but he improved from last week.

Let's not just forget how Sanchez played in his first two years. This year has been a disaster in terms of injuries. No Keller again today, Hill goes down, the Jets are now playing Schilens, Kerley, and recently signed off the street Marty Gilyard. Cumberland went down and missed most of the game, Kerley and Hilyard on key 3rd down plays. This has been the problem all year. Inability to run the ball in spots, players dropping balls, key players dropping like flies, or missing time all year long.

Do any of you realize what he had on the field with him today?

Then during the game, you're killing Sanchez and the team because they won't throw the ball. Do you not realize the offense has been completely vanilla lately due to those injuries?

Sanchez is only part of the problem, and he has his role in all of this, but you have to evaluate everything. Sanchez is out there trying to make plays, trying to run an offense that has JAG players around him at all skill position areas. The Jets are finally healthy at RB, so the running game is picking up and is using the two-headed tandum in Greene and Powell they envisioned to start the year, but this too hasn't been available until recently due to Powell's injuries.

Is Sanchez inaccurate because he has no chemistry with the players on the field, and is trying to make it work on the fly, or has he regressed?

You can make an argument that Sanchez has regressed, but it is all due to these other factors.

This Jets team despite all the crap this year, the media driven agenda, the BS spin about how the Jets are a circus, and they are STILL a team playing hard, and now within 1 game of a playoff birth.

If the Giants lose today, and it certainly is possible against a potent Saints team that is not playing well but can put it together at any time, could drop to 7-6 today, exactly 1 game better than the Jets...

But fans should continue buying the crap the media is selling, some of you are ****ting it out faster than you can eat it!!!! Some of you act as if this is Kotite's 1-15 Jets.

We haven't. He was awful in 2009 and was a below average QB in 2010 despite the talent around him.

[Ray Ray19]

Originally Posted by w0mbat

We haven't. He was awful in 2009 and was a below average QB in 2010 despite the talent around him.

He was a rookie and a second year player, and showed plenty but had bouts of inconsistencies. There is a difference. He had multiple game ending drives where he won the game because of his play. He has 4 playoff road wins, and played well in all of them.

Let's not be blinded by hate or is it ignorance?