Tell me ehat Sanchez is GOOD at...seriously - Page 3 - Jets Insider.com Forums

HOTROD · 12-09-2012, 05:25 PM

When it comes to throwing a Pick 6 nobody comes close. I've seen enough of Mark at the stadium to know that he is not the answer. It's sad cuz I once had a Sanchez jersey. His career would be better off playing for the Arizona Cardinals. I'm geting tired of watching him play. I still don't know why they offered an extension. Tannenbaum has to be fired!

Ray Ray19 · 12-09-2012, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sanchez 3:16

He's good at pissing off the masses on JI... which personally brings me great joy in debating with the miserable folks on here.

+ 1

It's pathetic and shameless that Jets fans are pissed because Sanchez played, and especially that McElroy was inactive, and are upset about the win and a chance to make it to post-season.

chrisjets23 · 12-09-2012, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray Ray19

+ 1

It's pathetic and shameless that Jets fans are pissed because Sanchez played, and especially that McElroy was inactive, and are upset about the win and a chance to make it to post-season.

Jets fans are seeing the bigger picture that's why. Any of our QBs could have won with this gameplan today. And even with the limit dropbacks from Sanchez...he STILL had a turnover.

Mainejet · 12-09-2012, 05:53 PM

He no longer sh*ts on the floor in the Jets office complex anymore.

SlickBri481 · 12-09-2012, 05:54 PM

Handing the ball off?

Ray Ray19 · 12-09-2012, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisjets23

Jets fans are seeing the bigger picture that's why. Any of our QBs could have won with this gameplan today. And even with the limit dropbacks from Sanchez...he STILL had a turnover.

The bigger picture?

The big picture every year is worry about the year the team is in, there are no guarantees with anything the next year, whether it is hoping for a better draft position, making moves in FA, etc. Teams go back to the chaulkboard every year!

The clowns are dumping on Sanchez and the offense for 111 yds passing, but you fail to realize Sanchez is out there playing with Kerley, Schilens, Gilyard, and Rueland as his main players at WR and TE.

The offense was OBVIOUSLY vanilla! The running game became a major factor in the second half, why go away from it?

sect313 · 12-09-2012, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlickBri481

Handing the ball off?

he is good at rolling out and throwing on the run. need to do that more

chrisjets23 · 12-09-2012, 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray Ray19

The bigger picture?

The big picture every year is worry about the year the team is in, there are no guarantees with anything the next year, whether it is hoping for a better draft position, making moves in FA, etc. Teams go back to the chaulkboard every year!

The clowns are dumping on Sanchez and the offense for 111 yds passing, but you fail to realize Sanchez is out there playing with Kerley, Schilens, Gilyard, and Rueland as his main players at WR and TE.

The offense was OBVIOUSLY vanilla! The running game became a major factor in the second half, why go away from it?

It's a QB driven league, and it's nearly impossible to win a Superbowl without one.

Jets are giving 8 million $ next year to a QB who can only win when he throws less than 20 times a game for 100 yards. Tanny deserves a lot of blame too for these problems, but Sanchez will never make anyone around him better either.

SlickBri481 · 12-09-2012, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisjets23

It's a QB driven league, and it's nearly impossible to win a Superbowl without one.

Jets are giving 8 million $ next year to a QB who can only win when he throws less than 20 times a game for 100 yards. Tanny deserves a lot of blame too for these problems, but Sanchez will never make anyone around him better either.

Shhhhhh don't ruin Rah Rah's celebration. He has Sanchez in the HoF after today

Kentucky Jet · 12-09-2012, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAR I

Mark Sanchez is good when he had playmakers like Edwards, Holmes, Cotchery, Burress, Tomlinson, Richardson, Jones, and Washington.

Mark Sanchez isn't good when he has fap like Schillens, Hill, Kerley, McKnight, Gates, Hilliard, and Greene.

No quarterback could succeed with this group of offensive sh-t.

SAR I

when he had those guys, he still never completed 60 per cent of his passes. We won with him because of the run game and defense, same as today! Face it: the man is not a very good QB and when he faces better competition he does little to win the game. He can not elevate the play of those around him due to being so inaccurate. If we had Welker on this team he'd be JAG.

Sanchez 3:16 · 12-09-2012, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kentucky Jet

when he had those guys, he still never completed 60 per cent of his passes. We won with him because of the run game and defense, same as today! Face it: the man is not a very good QB and when he faces better competition he does little to win the game. He can not elevate the play of those around him due to being so inaccurate. If we had Welker on this team he'd be JAG.

Have we ever lost a game because of the run game and defense? Surely we have.

Every win is credited to the run and the D (which a day like today is true). Every loss is credited to Sanchez.

Got it.

Rhode Island Green · 12-09-2012, 06:38 PM

A Jets win is always good.

Sanchez is dreadful. That's my take.

Mohegangreen · 12-09-2012, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mainejet

He no longer sh*ts on the floor in the Jets office complex anymore.

😜👍

Sexi Rexi · 12-09-2012, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mainejet

He no longer sh*ts on the floor in the Jets office complex anymore.

He saves it all for the field now.

SONNY WERBLIN · 12-09-2012, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAR I

Mark Sanchez is good when he had playmakers like Edwards, Holmes, Cotchery, Burress, Tomlinson, Richardson, Jones, and Washington.

Mark Sanchez isn't good when he has fap like Schillens, Hill, Kerley, McKnight, Gates, Hilliard, and Greene.

No quarterback could succeed with this group of offensive sh-t.

SAR I

This makes no sense.... McElroy (who is not very good) had success with the same group of offensive sh-t despite the fact that he gets 0 snaps with the them in practice.

Untouchable · 12-09-2012, 10:09 PM

Well, he's a f*cking prodigy when it comes to giving the ball to the opposing team.

I'll give him that.

johnnysd · 12-09-2012, 10:19 PM

It's interesting that throwing on the run (maybe) is the only actual non joke response on what Sanchez does well.

SAR I · 12-09-2012, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SONNY WERBLIN

This makes no sense.... McElroy (who is not very good) had success with the same group of offensive sh-t despite the fact that he gets 0 snaps with the them in practice.

McElroy? "Success"?

The guy threw for 29 yards in a quarter of a football game. The reason we won against Arizona and Jacksonville is because they are bad against the run, and so our old backs got some decent yardage. The passing game is our biggest concern due to lack of playmakers, so any time we play a team where a vertical attack is necessary, we're going to lose.

SAR I

fusion · 12-09-2012, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray Ray19

The bigger picture?

The big picture every year is worry about the year the team is in, there are no guarantees with anything the next year, whether it is hoping for a better draft position, making moves in FA, etc. Teams go back to the chaulkboard every year!

The clowns are dumping on Sanchez and the offense for 111 yds passing, but you fail to realize Sanchez is out there playing with Kerley, Schilens, Gilyard, and Rueland as his main players at WR and TE.

The offense was OBVIOUSLY vanilla! The running game became a major factor in the second half, why go away from it?

you fail to realize that Kerley, Schilens, Gilyard, and Rueland are playing with Sanchez as QB

i am sure they dream about the day they will play with a real QB

Kerley went from playing with Andy Dalton in college to playing with Sanchez at the NFL, talk about a downgrade...

SONNY WERBLIN · 12-09-2012, 10:26 PM

I posted this the other day. A comparison of Sanchez stats in the wins and losses (not including today's game).

13.4/26.2 51.1% 163 yds 1.4 td 1 int 0.4 fumbles
19.6/34.3 57.1% 232 yds 0.7 td 1 int 0.7 fumbles

He appears to be equally bad in wins and losses. In the losses, he throws the ball more (which is a fact for most QBs), has a 6.0% higher completion percentage, and 69 more yards/game. In the wins, he throws the ball less, tosses .7 more td/game with .3 less fumbles/game. So, it appears the winning formula for Sanchez is to avoid allowing the fact that he is in the game, touching the ball on every play, have an actual impact (favorable or unfavorable) on the outcome...yeah that's what I look for in a QB.

Cheer or Fear
Belsnickel is here
How will he jusge Mark Sanchez's year
...

...
Definitely IMPISH

12-09-2012, 05:25 PM	#41
HOTROD Jets on lifesupport. Waterboy Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 91	He is good When it comes to throwing a Pick 6 nobody comes close. I've seen enough of Mark at the stadium to know that he is not the answer. It's sad cuz I once had a Sanchez jersey. His career would be better off playing for the Arizona Cardinals. I'm geting tired of watching him play. I still don't know why they offered an extension. Tannenbaum has to be fired!

12-09-2012, 05:53 PM	#44
Mainejet impatiently waiting for the Jets to win the SB Hall Of Fame Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 11,871	He no longer sh*ts on the floor in the Jets office complex anymore.

12-09-2012, 05:54 PM	#45
SlickBri481 Heal up Darrelle... All Pro Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 6,351	Handing the ball off?

12-09-2012, 06:38 PM	#52
Rhode Island Green Veteran Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Connecticut Posts: 111	A Jets win is always good. Sanchez is dreadful. That's my take.

12-09-2012, 10:09 PM	#56
Untouchable Hall Of Fame Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 22,403	Well, he's a f*cking prodigy when it comes to giving the ball to the opposing team. I'll give him that.

12-09-2012, 10:19 PM	#57
johnnysd Founding Member of the Geno Bandwagon Veteran Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,142	It's interesting that throwing on the run (maybe) is the only actual non joke response on what Sanchez does well.

12-09-2012, 10:26 PM	#60
SONNY WERBLIN Veteran Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 2,357	I posted this the other day. A comparison of Sanchez stats in the wins and losses (not including today's game). 13.4/26.2 51.1% 163 yds 1.4 td 1 int 0.4 fumbles 19.6/34.3 57.1% 232 yds 0.7 td 1 int 0.7 fumbles He appears to be equally bad in wins and losses. In the losses, he throws the ball more (which is a fact for most QBs), has a 6.0% higher completion percentage, and 69 more yards/game. In the wins, he throws the ball less, tosses .7 more td/game with .3 less fumbles/game. So, it appears the winning formula for Sanchez is to avoid allowing the fact that he is in the game, touching the ball on every play, have an actual impact (favorable or unfavorable) on the outcome...yeah that's what I look for in a QB. Cheer or Fear Belsnickel is here How will he jusge Mark Sanchez's year ... ... Definitely IMPISH