Can the Jets afford Welker ? - Page 3 - Jets Insider.com Forums

C Mart · 12-16-2012, 10:16 AM

Another thread derailed by the same posters...every time! If I was a mod.....

PatriotReign · 12-16-2012, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray Ray19

Hey TROLL STFU, you don't get to criticize anybody around here.

Perhaps you should make a post declaring that all posters need your authorization to point out that you're acting like an insufferable asshat.

sg3 · 12-16-2012, 10:17 AM

Darn you ray....your stick has stirred up three hideous rabid frothing chowd troll ferrets with one swipe

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

FreshBaked 24 7 · 12-16-2012, 10:32 AM

This thread is gold.

Rah Rah, never leave

JetsfanfromtheBURGH · 12-16-2012, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McGinley

No thanks. Brady isn't gonna be throwing him the ball here, so I'm not entirely sure he would be that great for us. Not to mention, we already have receivers that are 4'9. What we need to do is get Hill reps and develop him. A tall, young, fast Hill with better hands and experience is much more important to us than an older Welker.

I got it!

Revis and our entire 2013 draft for Brady.

124 · 12-16-2012, 10:42 AM

No.

And even if they could, Jeremy Kerley is our slot receiver. He's young and emerging, let him develop.

CGJET · 12-16-2012, 10:46 AM

Nope, that's why the Pats continue to be successful, they allow players to leave as they get older and have no emotional attachments.

Mainejet · 12-16-2012, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rmeyer52

Welker is a FA next year and from what I have read the relationship between him and the Pats front office is not too good. He is not the fastest receiver but he always seems to find a way to get open. Should the Jets go after him ?

Ugh? When you have a QB that sucks and is totally inaccurate????

NO. What would be the point? That's like putting a silk hat on a pig.

Besides, when the Jets jettison Sanchez and put a real QB on the team, he'll have Braylon Edwards and Santonio Holmes and Jeremy Kerley.

Bray and Holmes did pretty well for the team in 2010. Lets see what they can do for us in 2013.

sec.101row23 · 12-16-2012, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C Mart

Another thread derailed by the same posters...every time! If I was a mod.....

Would be an excellent move IMO.

GuidoYaztremski · 12-16-2012, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mainejet

Ugh? When you have a QB that sucks and is totally inaccurate????

NO. What would be the point? That's like putting a silk hat on a pig.

Besides, when the Jets jettison Sanchez and put a real QB on the team, he'll have Braylon Edwards and Santonio Holmes and Jeremy Kerley.

Bray and Holmes did pretty well for the team in 2010. Lets see what they can do for us in 2013.

I think you still have Sanchez as the guy slinging the rock in 2013. Will Bray, Holmes, and Kerley still be on the '14 squad?

revischrist · 12-16-2012, 12:04 PM

zero interest in Welker. Welker is great for a guy like Brady, but i rather spend my money on a number 1 WR and not a slot WR that is going to command much more money than Kerley (IMO), is much older than Kerley and isn't really that much better than Kerley.

Who knows how effective he will be without Brady and that system.

Pass

southside · 12-16-2012, 12:26 PM

Can we afford to have another WR on our team that has a case of the dropsies? No. Absolutely not. We can not afford Welker.

sg3 · 12-16-2012, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by southside

Can we afford to have another WR on our team that has a case of the dropsies? No. Absolutely not. We can not afford Welker.

+1

thought I would try and get a post in before Guido and the rest of the stinking chowd trolls derail and destroy another thread

PatsFanTX · 12-16-2012, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revischrist

zero interest in Welker. Welker is great for a guy like Brady, but i rather spend my money on a number 1 WR and not a slot WR that is going to command much more money than Kerley (IMO), is much older than Kerley and isn't really that much better than Kerley.

Delusional Jets fan.

When was the last time Kerley had 100 receptions and 1,000 yards?

FF2® · 12-16-2012, 03:04 PM

list the receivers who have great years with Brady, get a big contract from someone else and continue to excel.

I'll wait.

sackdance · 12-16-2012, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McGinley

It's Brady. Give Welker Lolchez and his numbers go right back down.

Not even Megatron would be Lolchez-proof.

Good teams need good football players. Welker is good-to-excellent. Would the Jets be better with him? Yes. Will it be any kind of priority to pursue him? Probably not. Our needs list doesn't jibe with what Welker has to offer and some other team would snatch him provided the Pats themselves already haven't.

And plenty of the clowns assessing how worthless Welker is were pretty resolute in calling for patience in letting the greatness of Sanchez emerge.

FF2® · 12-16-2012, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GuidoYaztremski

Another great football post. Thanks.

Where's those 12 wins you promised?

I think Rah Rah meant this year + next year.

GuidoYaztremski · 12-16-2012, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FF2®

I think Rah Rah meant this year + next year.

This guy gets it.

pssst.... it's all the media's fault.

ucrenegade · 12-16-2012, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fidelioion

Welker would not be good on the Jets. We have no QB.

He would just be another over priced WR not producing.

If Kerley were on the Pats he would be looking at an all-pro season.

Yep until we get rid of suckchez we could have moss,rice,and Maynard and we would still suck

sdJETSetter · 12-16-2012, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FF2®

I think Rah Rah meant this year + next year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GuidoYaztremski

This guy gets it.

What about our playoff push, you trolling turdo's?

12-16-2012, 10:46 AM	#47
CGJET Does not have a tattoo of his wife in a Sanchez jersey. Veteran Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Chicago, Illinois Posts: 1,254	Nope, that's why the Pats continue to be successful, they allow players to leave as they get older and have no emotional attachments. Last edited by CGJET; 12-16-2012 at 12:37 PM.

12-16-2012, 10:16 AM	#41
C Mart Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 21,304	Another thread derailed by the same posters...every time! If I was a mod.....

12-16-2012, 10:17 AM	#43
sg3 REX AND THE I-MAN - BACK ON TRACK Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: The Big Apple, USA Posts: 20,392	Darn you ray....your stick has stirred up three hideous rabid frothing chowd troll ferrets with one swipe Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

12-16-2012, 10:32 AM	#44
FreshBaked 24 7 wait...wha? 0_o All League Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Midland Park, NJ Posts: 3,697	This thread is gold. Rah Rah, never leave

12-16-2012, 10:42 AM	#46
124 There's NO reason to delay the process. Start Geno Smith. All Pro Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 7,970	No. And even if they could, Jeremy Kerley is our slot receiver. He's young and emerging, let him develop.

12-16-2012, 12:04 PM	#51
revischrist Dee Best! Veteran Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 1,734	zero interest in Welker. Welker is great for a guy like Brady, but i rather spend my money on a number 1 WR and not a slot WR that is going to command much more money than Kerley (IMO), is much older than Kerley and isn't really that much better than Kerley. Who knows how effective he will be without Brady and that system. Pass

12-16-2012, 12:26 PM	#52
southside Forever Awesome All Pro Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 8,888	Can we afford to have another WR on our team that has a case of the dropsies? No. Absolutely not. We can not afford Welker.

12-16-2012, 03:04 PM	#55
FF2® Believes Sloppy Guy was involved JetsInsider.com Legend Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 46,192	list the receivers who have great years with Brady, get a big contract from someone else and continue to excel. I'll wait.