Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!
LATEST JI HEADLINES
TOP STORY
Kellen Winslow Signs One-Year Contract
 
6/14 : Jets set to rebuild around talented trio of d-linemen
6/14 : JetsInsider Radio: Minicamp Wrap-Up Edition (Player Embedded)
6/13 : Drops on Drops on Drops
6/11 : Winslow, Sims-Walker Begin Tryouts
Go Back   Jets Insider.com Forums > Main Forums > The Landing Strip: All NY Jets and NFL - 24/7
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

The Landing Strip: All NY Jets and NFL - 24/7 Welcome to the most active NY Jets Messageboard on the internet. Celebrating a decade on the web! Talk about all of your NY Jets and NFL related topics here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-15-2013, 07:59 PM   #1
yayankee
Who is the next Joe Namath?
Undrafted Free Agent
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 186
WSJ: Maybe the Jets' Cap Situation Isn't Hopeless

The Wall Street Journal

NY JETS
January 15, 2013, 7:41 p.m. ET

Maybe the Jets' Cap Situation Isn't Hopeless
By MICHAEL SALFINO

Before the Jets' new head of football operations tries to rebuild this 6-10 team, he must first dig it out of a roughly $25 million salary-cap hole. That helps explain why the Jets' top football job remains unfilled more than two weeks after the firing of general manager Mike Tannenbaum.

But a closer examination of the Jets' 2013 obligations reveals that an act of Congress won't be needed to rescue this team. At least that much cap room can be found by simply cutting some disappointing, highly paid veterans.

According to NYJetsCap.com, the Jets will be about $21 million over the estimated 2013 salary cap when the new league season begins in March. Additionally, the team needs to clear about $4 million more to sign its 2013 draft class.

The biggest savings, $12 million, can be had by cutting tackle Jason Smith, a backup whom ProFootballFocus.com ranked just 35th at his position based on his performance on every snap. Linebacker Calvin Pace ranked 69th of 72 linebackers and saves the Jets another $8.6 million if cut.

Fellow starting linebacker Bart Scott graded much better (23rd of 112), but returns the Jets another $7.2 million if released. Defensive tackle Sione Pouha, safety Eric Smith and quarterback Tim Tebow all graded poorly, too, and can be let go for a combined salary cap windfall of about $7.4 million. That adds up to $35.2 million—$10.2 million more than needed even before renegotiating other contracts for additional savings.

Due to arcane NFL salary-cap accounting, other players actually result in a cap charge if cut. For example, jettisoning quarterback Mark Sanchez in 2013 would force the team to first find another $4.3 million cap room.
—Michael Salfino
This Can Work

Here are the dispensable players whom the Jets can save the most 2013 salary-cap room by cutting, along with their 2012 ranking at their position.
player position cap value cap savings
if cut 2012 positional rank
Jason Smith T $12M $12M 35th of 122

Calvin Pace
LB $11.57M $8.56M 69th of 72

Bart Scott
LB $8.65M $7.15M 23rd of 112

Sione Pouha
DT $6.17M $3.83M 51st of 85

Eric Smith
S $3M $3M 125th of 170

Tim Tebow
QB $2.59M $1.53M 34th of 71

Santonio Holmes
WR $12.5M $1.25M 100th of 206

Antonio Cromartie
CB $10.75M $1.25M 15th of 217

Sources: NYJetsCap.com, ProFootballFocus.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...testheadlines#

Not sure about Cro; but the others are necessary to clean up the mess.
yayankee is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-15-2013, 08:17 PM   #2
Nike
Fix it or sell it Woody!
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,386
keep cro and cut the rest end of story.
Nike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:17 PM   #3
jetswin
stumblin mumblin butt fumblin
Board Moderator
Jets Insider VIP
JetsInsider.com Legend
Charter JI Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Westchester Co.
Posts: 35,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by yayankee View Post
Linebacker Calvin Pace ranked 69th of 72 linebackers
good God
jetswin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:31 PM   #4
jetglass
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nike View Post
keep cro and cut the rest end of story.
As bad an attitude as he has, theres no way they can lose Holmes. Our receiving corps is terrible. Holmes is the only legitimate starting receiver on the roster. Holmes is a good #2, and Kerley a good #3. Get rid of Holmes and all you have on your team is a good #3. Hold off on comments about Hill. The guy is a bust now and will be the rest of his career. You can teach WR's to run better routes, use their body better to get to the ball, but you can never teach them how to catch the freakin ball.
jetglass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:34 PM   #5
southparkcpa
I see the 88 to 97 period all over again.
Jets Insider VIP
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 15,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetglass View Post
As bad an attitude as he has, theres no way they can lose Holmes. Our receiving corps is terrible. Holmes is the only legitimate starting receiver on the roster. Holmes is a good #2, and Kerley a good #3. Get rid of Holmes and all you have on your team is a good #3. Hold off on comments about Hill. The guy is a bust now and will be the rest of his career. You can teach WR's to run better routes, use their body better to get to the ball, but you can never teach them how to catch the freakin ball.
Agreed.... Not a fan of Holmes but you are right.
southparkcpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:36 PM   #6
Guy Incognito
Accidental bender.
Practice Squad
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: South Slope, BK
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetswin View Post
good God
It's frightening. Wayne Hunter range.
Another Tanny bust, as they say.
Imagine if hey was even just in the middle at 36?

Last edited by Guy Incognito; 01-15-2013 at 08:41 PM.
Guy Incognito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:38 PM   #7
DDNYjets
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 12,582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guy Incognito View Post
It's frightening, imagine if hey was even just in the middle at 36/72.
Imagine if we had an average QB and average OLBs. We would be a playoff team.
DDNYjets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:42 PM   #8
K-Met57
Jets 38 Bills 17
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,204
the notion that the jets are in "cap hell" is completely overstated. i recall very clearly after parcells left, we were in absolute terrible situation as far as the cap...and had no substantial talent to show for it...that was HELL.

that being said, we currently have a good OL (best center in football), two elite CB's, good MLB's, good safeties (assuming we keep both), i am even ok with our receiving corps (braylon, hill, santonio, kerley).

EDIT: forgot two up and coming stud DE's and a very good DT in Pouha.

we have 3 issues:

QB - dont know how you get a decent QB, but there are ways of doing it...and the new GM will get paid to do so

RB - not a hard thing to do, easily could get a good RB in the second round, or move up into the late first

OLB - again, draft, free agency...i dont know exactly how or where...but its double with a top 10 pick especially

i think the jets are much closer to winning 11 games then they are to winning 5...but thats just me...

Last edited by K-Met57; 01-15-2013 at 08:45 PM.
K-Met57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:45 PM   #9
Nike
Fix it or sell it Woody!
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetglass View Post
As bad an attitude as he has, theres no way they can lose Holmes. Our receiving corps is terrible. Holmes is the only legitimate starting receiver on the roster. Holmes is a good #2, and Kerley a good #3. Get rid of Holmes and all you have on your team is a good #3. Hold off on comments about Hill. The guy is a bust now and will be the rest of his career. You can teach WR's to run better routes, use their body better to get to the ball, but you can never teach them how to catch the freakin ball.
disagree. braylon edwards can be as good a #1 as holmes has ever been here for alot less money. look to get improvement from kerley,hill and a possible free agent or draft pick.

it wont matter who you have in the wr corps if sanchez is still the qb in 2013.
Nike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:48 PM   #10
jetglass
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nike View Post
disagree. braylon edwards can be as good a #1 as holmes has ever been here for alot less money. look to get improvement from kerley,hill and a possible free agent or draft pick.

it wont matter who you have in the wr corps if sanchez is still the qb in 2013.
Braylon Edwards can be as good as a #1 or as bad as a practice squad player. You cant pin your hopes as a #1 receiver to a guy who has barely played the last 2 seasons while having serious durability concerns. If you tell me its Braylon of 2010 then I think we are set. But this is 3 years later.
jetglass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:48 PM   #11
Dimitri_0515
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 11,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nike View Post
disagree. braylon edwards can be as good a #1 as holmes has ever been here for alot less money. look to get improvement from kerley,hill and a possible free agent or draft pick.

it wont matter who you have in the wr corps if sanchez is still the qb in 2013.
no he can't
Dimitri_0515 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:49 PM   #12
Gastineau99
Section 135
All Pro
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,349
Can't cut Holmes. Te $1.5 savings is deceiving since the jets would still be paying him $9mil to play for another team. Won't happen. He's our best weapon, and a WR core of Holmes, Kerley, Braylon and Hill actually isn't that bad.
Gastineau99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:50 PM   #13
Nike
Fix it or sell it Woody!
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetglass View Post
Braylon Edwards can be as good as a #1 or as bad as a practice squad player. You cant pin your hopes as a #1 receiver to a guy who has barely played the last 2 seasons while having serious durability concerns. If you tell me its Braylon of 2010 then I think we are set. But this is 3 years later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitri_0515 View Post
no he can't
but yet we call holmes the #1 wr. yea right.
Nike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:53 PM   #14
southparkcpa
I see the 88 to 97 period all over again.
Jets Insider VIP
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 15,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gastineau99 View Post
Can't cut Holmes. Te $1.5 savings is deceiving since the jets would still be paying him $9mil to play for another team. Won't happen. He's our best weapon, and a WR core of Holmes, Kerley, Braylon and Hill actually isn't that bad.
Who's gonna throw the ball?
southparkcpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:55 PM   #15
Guy Incognito
Accidental bender.
Practice Squad
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: South Slope, BK
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by DDNYjets View Post
Imagine if we had an average QB and average OLBs. We would be a playoff team.
It's just so sad.
Guy Incognito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 09:02 PM   #16
Guy Incognito
Accidental bender.
Practice Squad
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: South Slope, BK
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Met57 View Post
the notion that the jets are in "cap hell" is completely overstated. i recall very clearly after parcells left, we were in absolute terrible situation as far as the cap...and had no substantial talent to show for it...that was HELL.

that being said, we currently have a good OL (best center in football), two elite CB's, good MLB's, good safeties (assuming we keep both), i am even ok with our receiving corps (braylon, hill, santonio, kerley).

EDIT: forgot two up and coming stud DE's and a very good DT in Pouha.

we have 3 issues:

QB - dont know how you get a decent QB, but there are ways of doing it...and the new GM will get paid to do so

RB - not a hard thing to do, easily could get a good RB in the second round, or move up into the late first

OLB - again, draft, free agency...i dont know exactly how or where...but its double with a top 10 pick especially

i think the jets are much closer to winning 11 games then they are to winning 5...but thats just me...
Thanks buddy! This post honestly made me feel better.
I'll drink it up.
Guy Incognito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 10:16 PM   #17
shuler82
Jets Insider VIP
Charter JI Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: hoboken
Posts: 5,685
First up.. props to Jason423 for getting sourced in the WSJ. He runs a great website.

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Met57 View Post
the notion that the jets are in "cap hell" is completely overstated. i recall very clearly after parcells left, we were in absolute terrible situation as far as the cap...and had no substantial talent to show for it...that was HELL.

that being said, we currently have a good OL (best center in football), two elite CB's, good MLB's, good safeties (assuming we keep both), i am even ok with our receiving corps (braylon, hill, santonio, kerley).

EDIT: forgot two up and coming stud DE's and a very good DT in Pouha.

we have 3 issues:

QB - dont know how you get a decent QB, but there are ways of doing it...and the new GM will get paid to do so

RB - not a hard thing to do, easily could get a good RB in the second round, or move up into the late first

OLB - again, draft, free agency...i dont know exactly how or where...but its double with a top 10 pick especially

i think the jets are much closer to winning 11 games then they are to winning 5...but thats just me...
Now.. I'm here to rain on your parade a bit.

Yes, it's true that by cutting Pace, Scott, Jason Smith, Eric Smith and Tebow, the Jets will be under the cap. Add in the roll over in savings from this year, and we could be close to $15 million over. So what's the problem?

Here's the problem:

Jets FA


Defense:
Landry
Bell
Thomas
Devito

-Landry is going to get paid. The Jets can't afford what he'll demand on the market.

-Devito is a guy the Jets should try to resign, but he might land more $$ elsewhere.

-Thomas won't seem like a big loss if the Jets weren't already cutting Scott and Pace. That's 3/4 of a LB crew gone. It's high possible the Jets bring Scott or Thomas back for 1 year vet min contracts, mainly because they know the system and the team wont be able to afford to bring in starting quality LBs in FA. Davis will need to come in and start next year.

-Bell is a candidate to come back at a 1 year deal if he still wants to play. Assuming we lose Landry, we need Allen or Bell to step up and start in 2013.


Offense FA:

Greene
Keller
Slauson
Moore
Schillens

Greene - it's an easy (and popular) opinion to let Greene walk, but that will most likely mean grabbing a RB in the top 3 rounds of the draft to step in and play.

Keller - If Sanchez is coming back, Keller will probably be given the franchise tag. If not, they could let him walk. Again, the Jets will need to find a starting replacement.

Slauson - After the Jets jerked him around by making him take a paycut and then subbing in Duccase during the season, I dont see any way Slauson is coming back.

Moore - The other starting OG to probably have played his last down as a Jet. His play is declining, but without a viable alternative, the Jets could be offering Moore a one year deal.


Schillens - not a big loss, but the Jets will need to add WR depth whether through a low priced FA or later in the draft.


To summarize:

The Jets will have to replace two starting safeties, both outside linebackers, and inside starting linebacker, a rotation DE, both starting guards, their starting RB, starting TE, WR depth, and we haven't even started taking about the QB position..

The good news is the Jets can get more space by restructuring (or trading) Harris or Cromartie. (or perhaps even Revis) I can't see them wanting to add more years to Holmes or Sanchez's deals to lower their 2013 cap hit... but even if they create another $10-15 million of room, they still have a lot of holes to fill.
shuler82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 10:18 PM   #18
Nike
Fix it or sell it Woody!
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,386
signing bell and landry is priority job 1.
Nike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 10:27 PM   #19
K-Met57
Jets 38 Bills 17
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by shuler82 View Post
First up.. props to Jason423 for getting sourced in the WSJ. He runs a great website.



Now.. I'm here to rain on your parade a bit.

Yes, it's true that by cutting Pace, Scott, Jason Smith, Eric Smith and Tebow, the Jets will be under the cap. Add in the roll over in savings from this year, and we could be close to $15 million over. So what's the problem?

Here's the problem:

Jets FA


Defense:
Landry
Bell
Thomas
Devito

-Landry is going to get paid. The Jets can't afford what he'll demand on the market.

-Devito is a guy the Jets should try to resign, but he might land more $$ elsewhere.

-Thomas won't seem like a big loss if the Jets weren't already cutting Scott and Pace. That's 3/4 of a LB crew gone. It's high possible the Jets bring Scott or Thomas back for 1 year vet min contracts, mainly because they know the system and the team wont be able to afford to bring in starting quality LBs in FA. Davis will need to come in and start next year.

-Bell is a candidate to come back at a 1 year deal if he still wants to play. Assuming we lose Landry, we need Allen or Bell to step up and start in 2013.


Offense FA:

Greene
Keller
Slauson
Moore
Schillens

Greene - it's an easy (and popular) opinion to let Greene walk, but that will most likely mean grabbing a RB in the top 3 rounds of the draft to step in and play.

Keller - If Sanchez is coming back, Keller will probably be given the franchise tag. If not, they could let him walk. Again, the Jets will need to find a starting replacement.

Slauson - After the Jets jerked him around by making him take a paycut and then subbing in Duccase during the season, I dont see any way Slauson is coming back.

Moore - The other starting OG to probably have played his last down as a Jet. His play is declining, but without a viable alternative, the Jets could be offering Moore a one year deal.


Schillens - not a big loss, but the Jets will need to add WR depth whether through a low priced FA or later in the draft.


To summarize:

The Jets will have to replace two starting safeties, both outside linebackers, and inside starting linebacker, a rotation DE, both starting guards, their starting RB, starting TE, WR depth, and we haven't even started taking about the QB position..

The good news is the Jets can get more space by restructuring (or trading) Harris or Cromartie. (or perhaps even Revis) I can't see them wanting to add more years to Holmes or Sanchez's deals to lower their 2013 cap hit... but even if they create another $10-15 million of room, they still have a lot of holes to fill.
so another words we cant afford to pay anyone, no one wants to play here, and we have no capacity to draft or sign free agents. does that about cover it? you must be one of those guys that knows exactly who our next GM should be
K-Met57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 10:28 PM   #20
K-Met57
Jets 38 Bills 17
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nike View Post
signing bell and landry is priority job 1.
Bell is replaceable, Landry is a good safety...i hope to see him back.
K-Met57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2013, JetsInsider.com LTD