|
![]() |
|||||||
| JetsInsider Draft Forum A forum to discuss all subjects related to the NY Jets and the NFL Draft. Post all of your mock drafts and predictions here. For more detailed info please go to our sister site, www.draftinsider.net! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
Saved,and Thankfull
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delaware
Posts: 5,459
|
The Jets 1st round pick needs to be at a premium position, and since no QB is available, the next best premium position is LT. If this kid has the talent every is saying he has, we should take him and not even look back. If this kid is blocking the SEC defenders at the Senior Bowl, what more does he have to prove.
The Jets need to fix the offense by getting a QB and fixing the OL. Take the best premium position player and wait until the next pick and see what's available. If u can get a late 1st or early 2nd for Revis take it and move on . Anything worst, and it's not worth entertaining. OH, and Brick Ferguson is the something the Jets can't live without. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
On Iowa
All League
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,652
|
I'd be all for taking him at 9 if he's there. I'm also estatic that his stock is rising. Lots of teams ahead of us that need OL. The higher his asscent, the better chances one of Jones or Moore slide to us. If they don't and he does last til 9, I'm good too. It's a win win for the Jets having a player at this position climb in draft stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,090
|
Quote:
Guards? Yup,the top rate guy sounds very good but just how huge of players are iaputi and some of the other mid to late first rounders? We need skilled play makers on offense and defense as well as helping the oline. 9 is the place you get the aldon smiths, von millers, etc. I wouldn't be happy with a guard at 9 but i could maybe live with it but the guy better be a career pro bowler. Tackle, not at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,090
|
LEFT TACKLES are taken in the top 10, not right tackles when you already have a very good LT on the team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,090
|
OLB hopefully. We literally have no nfl quality guys for olb right now. We have had no outside pass rush for a number of years. Our offense sucks and we need to buuld that you say? for sure, in my 1st mock i had us going offense 2nd and 3rd round.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,090
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 22,409
|
The only OL that I would consider at #9 is Warmack.
Guy is just a total mauler who annihilates anything in front of him. He doesn't just have pro-bowl upside, he has John Hannah/Mike Munchak upside. Unless someone like Geno or Moore falls, he's the guy I'd take in Round 1. I'd rather have a guy who is virtually guaranteed to be a dominant force along the OL for the next decade over the 3rd/4th rated passrusher. If Rex is such a defensive guru, then why does he need 1st round picks all over the field to put together a Top 10 defense anyway? Our #1 priority this offseason needs to be improving the offense. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 7,043
|
Quote:
You've been pushing this philosophy for weeks now and it doesn't make anymore sense today than it did then. And just because he looks good at the Senior Bowl does not mean he's a can't miss prospect because the best pass rushers in the country -- Moore, Mingo, Montgomery, Jordan -- are not there. He's not facing Julius Peppers or JPP or Aldon Smith this week. He's facing a bunch of other unproven prospects. Getting rid of a talented and durable LT, who is in his prime, for an unknown is just plain stupid and not worth discussing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Raider football- JUST FLYNN BABY.
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,305
|
Quote:
JMo. That rule went out when the guarantee money did. I just think if you can put out two top Lt quality left tackles. I don't care what top pass rushers are coming off either corner , you're going to be able to handle that. (Teams can't simply move their top pass rusher to the other side) your able to give your Qb time than it doesn't matter who you have at the skill position , as a Nfl starting Qb should be able to thrive under those situations. Now you do have top offense weapons to go with that than you are talking about something special on offense. Jmo if you don't have an elie Qb(top five) this is the way to go. rich Gannon didn't suddenly in.2002 become a League MVP. That Oline he had in front of him played a big part in his success. This is where your big money should go , and not in the cb position.( AL Davis mistake for years) BTW - No way you get rid of your Lt if he one of the better ones.. what are you accomplishing substituting one for the other. It being able to put two quality Lt bookend tackles out there together. Now your talking about something special. As A Raider fan Raiders have Veldheer who very good Lt and getting better. I wouldn't hesitate to take Joeckel if he there at three. I instantly upgrade at two positions on the Oline. Last edited by Raider9175; 01-24-2013 at 06:36 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Saved,and Thankfull
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delaware
Posts: 5,459
|
Quote:
I am not pushing anything or wishing for anything. What i post is what i would do if i was the GM and the right opportunities presented themselves. I am not trading this player for a 2nd or 3rd round pick. Just like i would not trade Revis for anything lower than a top 5 2nd round pick this year and future consideration that would have to be a 2nd or higher next yr. This Jet team needs to cut payroll and get younger at the areas of the team that are essential to winning.You need a solid to great QB, a top notch OL with a solid to great defensive front depending on the scheme you're playing. All the other positions should support those positions, not superseed them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,090
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
All Pro
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mendham, NJ
Posts: 7,847
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Raider football- JUST FLYNN BABY.
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,305
|
Quote:
just imagine two Dbickshaw Ferguson on both sides. you think Sanchez will be a lot more comfortable sitting in the pocket. A Qb with time and even the best cb's can only cover so long. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Saved,and Thankfull
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delaware
Posts: 5,459
|
Quote:
The problem with this senario is now you can't run the football to either side of the offensive because neither of your OTs can run block. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Let's Kill them all.........
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2009
Location: In Morris Co.,N.J.,at the right end of a Browning 12 gauge
Posts: 12,658
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,132
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Raider football- JUST FLYNN BABY.
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,305
|
I was talking in pass protection two Brickshaw Ferguson's.. This Fisher kid looks like he can run block and he looks like he very physical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Saved,and Thankfull
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delaware
Posts: 5,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Raider football- JUST FLYNN BABY.
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
wait...wha? 0_o
All League
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Midland Park, NJ
Posts: 3,697
|
Quote:
...lol |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|