|
![]() |
|||||||
| The Landing Strip: All NY Jets and NFL - 24/7 Welcome to the most active NY Jets Messageboard on the internet. Celebrating a decade on the web! Talk about all of your NY Jets and NFL related topics here! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#81 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,774
|
Agree with this! This gold rush is GREAT news.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,722
|
Quote:
the draft. Maybe because he and his staff was getting overruled by Rex and Tannenbaum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,133
|
my guess is that not only this, but the scouts were getting frustrated that tanny kept trading picks away. their work was minimized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Forever Awesome
All Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,938
|
You guys are predictable and I'm glad you are not the Jets GM.
If you think Rex is gonna sign off on this then you are crazy. Our pass defense wasn't that good last year either. You don't trade HOF talent in their prime... unless you're an idiot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,368
|
Hmmm...... the stats tell a different story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,115
|
Quote:
As for point 2, yes you do if you are in a cap poor situation, have determined that this iteration of the jets can not win it all and feel you can't afford or do not want to pay a CB the amount he may be asking. Hey, most people want to keep Revis and if we do they will be happy as clams. I think there is a misconception that people want to dump him asap. What people want is to build a team that can contend each and every year for a good number of years. As fans we may disagree on hos best to accomplish that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Hoosiers!
All League
Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999
Location: Fishers, Indiana
Posts: 3,509
|
I would say that the pass defense was good....but not as good as the stats would lead people to believe.
Part of what goes into the passing stats is the fact that teams ran the ball on us well, another part is that other teams were ahead alot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
All League
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: St. Peter-Ording (Germany)
Posts: 4,638
|
But for the first time in years we were awful against the run. Part of it was because we had to send extra players into coverage to make up for the loss of Revis. Then consider that a lot of teams did not even have to pass the ball against us because they a) could run it very well and b) were ahead.
Revis is a special player and talent and we had the worst year as a team and as a defense without him last season. Of course a lot of factors play into that but when you think that losing maybe the best CB OF ALL TIME wasnt one of them then you need to get your head checked. We need his presence and his talent to really be a special defense. Just like other top defenses in the league, you need all time players to have a GREAT, not good but great defense. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 | |
|
...back from the DEAD...again!
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,553
|
Quote:
The one team that jumps out among those mentioned...is Idzik's former team...the Seahawks. Perhaps mutual respect makes it easier for Jets to trade with them. And Jets may be willing to take a #2 and 5. Plus either Seattle's #1 or #2 corner. Of course...when I hear "goldrush"...that sounds to me that Jets may very well be able to get a #1...and a player of need. In the end...something has to give...cause I have no confidence that Jets can resign Revis. Do it Idzy...find us Revis gold in them thar hills
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
happy to be here
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,180
|
Quote:
Arizona $3.6M ($723,000) Atlanta $307,000 $4.9M Baltimore $1.2M $15.7M Buffalo $9.8M $20.6M Carolina $3.6M ($11.8M) Chicago $3.2M $13.3M Cincinnati $8.5M $55.1M Cleveland $14.3M $48.9M Dallas $2.3M ($18.2M) Denver $11.5M $18.5M Detroit $486,000 ($1.1M) Green Bay $7M $7.1M Houston $2.4M $12.9M Indianapolis $3.5M $46M Jacksonville $19.5M $22.1M Kansas City $14M $16.1M Miami $5.3M $35.8M Minnesota $8M $16.1M New England $5.6M $18.6M New Orleans $2.7M ($14.7M) NY Giants $1M ($4.7M) NY Jets $3.4M ($19.4M) Oakland $4.5M ($4.5M) Philadelphia $23M $5.2M Pittsburgh $758,000 ($10.8M) San Diego $995,000 $8.7M San Francisco $859,000 $3.9M Seattle $13.2M $18.6M St. Louis $247,000 $1.8M Tampa Bay $8.5M $31.3M Tennessee $12.8M $19.4M Washington $4.2M ($4M) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 | |
|
JI Resident Troll
Banned
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 52,068
|
Quote:
And that was without Revis. Revis will be more valuable to the Jets when he is on another team. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 | |
|
Champion of Common Sense
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,882
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,003
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forever Awesome
All Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,938
|
The eye test tells the real story. Teams ran the football on the Jets. They were #3 in lowest amount of throws against them. On the contrary, they were #3 in rush attempts against. That's why the stats look the way they do. The defense in general sucked last year. Cherry picking stats to make it seem better than it was is just that, cherry picking stats. I can find you some really alarming ones too that would state that our defense was poor.
This defense doesn't compare anywhere near the last few years have. Cromartie played better than some expected him too, but if anyone should be traded it's him. The only reason the Jets will trade Revis is because they can't franchise tag him and this is his last year. It's certainly not because they think their defense is fine without him. In fact, it's worse and a lot of numbers showed that. So yeah, the Jets looked like a great pass defense. That's only because people threw the ball sparingly and ran all over them. When the offense needed big pass plays, usually at the end of games, they got them at will. I don't care what the stats say. That's the way teams played against the defense. Methodically moving the ball, which is why they had the lowest disparity between rushing yards and passing yards given up. Last edited by southside; 01-25-2013 at 01:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 | |
|
Con Ritmo
Hall of Fame
Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,021
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Big whoop, wanna fight about it?
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 22,471
|
If there are teams actually willing to part with a 1st round pick and even additional picks or players for Revis, then you pull the trigger without hesitation.
Hypothetically, let's say Green Bay offers their 1st and a player like James Jones or Randall Cobb. You're telling me you wouldn't make that deal? Another hypothetical, San Fran offers us their 1st round pick and someone like Alex Smith or Ahmad Brooks. You wouldn't take that deal? I sure as hell would. |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Champion of Common Sense
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,882
|
It comes down to one key point. 2013 is not looking like a SB run type year. Either Revis resigns long term this offseason or he gets traded. Theres no way you go into 2013 with him unsigned and headed for FA. That would be stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 | |
|
Forever Awesome
All Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,938
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,320
|
Please get a first round pick for 2014! If the Jets are patient they will be able to drive up the cost for Revis as the news comes out that his recovery is going well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forever Awesome
All Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,938
|
Not only that but you want to give up Revis for a 1st round draft pick in one of the weakest draft classes in recent memory. And you want to do this to rebuild the offense? Who's available on offense in this years draft?
There is no logic with you people. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|