Ravens Bigger Dynasty Than The Patriots?

[32green]

Originally Posted by PatsFanTX

What a stupid comment.

Relax with the stupid stuff.


I know its hard.

[RussianGreen]

No team with ZERO honest wins (without cheating) should be mentioned in "dynasty" conversations. Pasterisks never won a SB. They got awarded some, but this is a different story

[JoeJam Football]

Originally Posted by RussianGreen

No team with ZERO honest wins (without cheating) should be mentioned in "dynasty" conversations. Pasterisks never won a SB. They got awarded some, but this is a different story

Yesss. What he said!

[Greensleeves]

Originally Posted by SAR I

I'm half serious here.

It should also be noted that the Patriots play in a division with no serious competition whereas the Ravens play in a division with another team that has itself gone to 3 Super Bowls since 2000.

There is no cakewalk to 13 wins in the AFC North.

SAR I

Easy answer: Neither are anywhere close to a dynasty.

[fnordcircle]

Dynasty talk is so retarded because it's all arbitrary. What defines a dynasty is so subjective I don't know why people post about this ****. It's like arguing about what constitutes the perfect set of breasts.

PS - the answer is small nipples, small, pink areola and enough size that there is cleavage.

[crasherino]

Originally Posted by CanadaSteve

2010
Sergio Kindle
Terrence Cody
Dennis Pitta
Arthur Jones

I know I'm nitpicking and I don't disagree with your overall premise, but has Sergio Kindle even played a down with the Ravens? If he did, the number of plays could probably be counted on 1 hand. He was waived when Suggs came back.

[Wiggy]

Originally Posted by SAR I

Since 2000, Ravens are 2-0 in Super Bowls, 9 playoff appearances, 14-7 record.

Since 2000, Patriots are 3-2 in Super Bowls, 10 playoff appearances, 17-7 record.

Patriots Super Bowl differential is +1. Ravens Super Bowl differential is +2.

SAR I

Really?????? CLOSE THREAD, LOL

[Warfish]

In all seriousness, what difference does it make to us, Jets Fans?

We're not the Pats. We're not the Ravens. We have no horse in the debate.

I'd much rather read a debate about the differences between Champion QB's like Flacco and Brady, and QB's like Sanchez.

Can our man ever do what Flacco did yesterday? Thats what I care about.

[fnordcircle]

Originally Posted by Warfish

In all seriousness, what difference does it make to us, Jets Fans?

Because the Pats and Jets have a pretty fun rivalry that some people take too seriously and it's why you have threads about spygate 5 years after the fact or threads on patsfans about every little thing Rex says.

[chirorob]

Originally Posted by Untouchable

I hate how everyone throws the words "elite" and "dynasty" around like hotcakes these days.

To me, there have only been 3 dynasties in the history of the league.

The 60's Packers, 70's Steelers and the 49ers of the 80's.

Teams like the early 90's Cowboys and the Pats of today aren't in that group IMO.

The Cowboys winning 3 SB in 4 years, and losing in the NFC championship game the other year doesn't count?

[Jet Nut]

Originally Posted by PatsFanTX

What a stupid comment.

Those "great" Jets drafts the last half decade has yielded the following:

0 Division titles
0 AFC Championships
0 Super Bowl titles

Yep, great job.

And without Brady and cheating your team would have:

0 Division titles
0 AFC Championships
0 Super Bowl titles

And Bellichich would be a DC somewhere, maybe.

[Jet Nut]

Originally Posted by chirorob

The Cowboys winning 3 SB in 4 years, and losing in the NFC championship game the other year doesn't count?

Exactly, not including them is silly.

[sg3]

in the salary cap era there will be few if any dynasties


one quibble with the post that talked about the "history of the league"


I think there were a few dynasties long before the 1960s Packers

think Monsters of the Midway for one


but, I'll just let anyone who really cares look up the league champions since 1926 and get the answers themselves

[child please]

Ravens 2 legit SB
NE Cheaters 0

end of discussion.

[southparkcpa]

Originally Posted by Warfish

In all seriousness, what difference does it make to us, Jets Fans?

We're not the Pats. We're not the Ravens. We have no horse in the debate.

I'd much rather read a debate about the differences between Champion QB's like Flacco and Brady, and QB's like Sanchez.

Can our man ever do what Flacco did yesterday? Thats what I care about.

No he can't..... And I agree with you.

whether our neighbors drive a Mercedes lease, bought or stolen, who cares.

We have a Yugo.

[ASG0531]

Originally Posted by jetsfreak

um Ravens last superbowl was 12 years ago...Patriots last superbowl win was 8 years ago....neither team is a dynasty lol

THIS. Whatever helps SAR sleep better at night. The Ravens are the true team of the... umm... errr... 2000s? Or something? But anyway it's so much more impressive than what the Patriots did, so all Jets fans, jump for joy!

[Apache 51]

The biggest difference SAR forgot to mention is they have at least one other team to contend with in their division, unlike the Patriots.

[First DOWN!]

So in 2013, we consider 2 championships in 13 years a dynasty?

What's gonna happen in 2018?

[ASG0531]

Originally Posted by First DOWN!

So in 2013, we consider 2 championships in 13 years a dynasty?

What's gonna happen in 2018?

No, there has been no Ravens dynasty. The Pats have the dynasty label. The Media rules the roost... Pats are excellent but unfortunate, Jets are a joke... it's the standard thing to say.

[BamaJets]

Speaking of the Pats' dynasty, here's a shirtless Gronk partying after the Super Bowl. At least this time he was not dancing on a broken ankle. But that Stone cold stunner with the broken forearm at the end probably wasn't the brightest thing to do.

http://www.tmz.com/2013/02/04/rob-gr...eo-broken-arm/