Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!
LATEST JI HEADLINES
TOP STORY
How to Decipher OTA Reports
 
5/17 : New Jets RB Goodson Arrested on Drugs and Weapons Charges
5/16 : Joe McKnight Doesn't Appreciate Questioning His Roster Spot
5/15 : QB Garrard to leave Jets
5/15 : uSTADIUM App Looks to Revolutionize Social Sports Media
Go Back   Jets Insider.com Forums > Main Forums > The Landing Strip: All NY Jets and NFL - 24/7
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

The Landing Strip: All NY Jets and NFL - 24/7 Welcome to the most active NY Jets Messageboard on the internet. Celebrating a decade on the web! Talk about all of your NY Jets and NFL related topics here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-14-2013, 11:14 AM   #21
joiseyjet
Hall Of Fame
Founding JI Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 9,359
The main reason we are told Sanchez is untradeable is because of his cap hit, if another team thinks he still has value, shouldn't we be able to split the cap hot with them so we csn move on .
joiseyjet is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-14-2013, 11:16 AM   #22
GuidoYaztremski
Tuukka Rask!!!
All League
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinstar View Post
There're 32 NFL teams and the vast Majority of them don't have a QB. The Bills, The Jags, The Cards, The Titans, The Bucs, The Vikes, The Browns,The Chiefs, The Raiders and Last but not least the Jets. Of those teams, only Mark Sanchez and Josh Freeman are young enough and have shown just enough to make a team contemplate looking at them.


I think that's a big market, and if Sanchez is willing to redo his contract to facilitate a trade, then the market is set.
All those teams have QBs that are statistically as good or better than Mark Sanchez. Do you really think they would trade for him because of a few games he played a few years ago (when the Jets had a top 3 D and running game), when they are in no worse position without him?
GuidoYaztremski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:16 AM   #23
Joe W. Namath
Darrell Bevell for HC in 2014.
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Posts: 7,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinstar View Post
I am glad you're not the GM. Quit thinking like an angry Fan and start thinking like someone with an asset.
Mark Sanchez is not an asset. he sucks. Even if he restructured, nobody will want him. The only way he gets another job is when he is off the books and a team can negotiate their own salary with him.
Joe W. Namath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:18 AM   #24
dustykeller
America's Hat
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 724
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuidoYaztremski View Post
Didn't go over my head at all. As others have noted, his current contract makes him untradable. And I see no reason why he wouldn't take his final payday as he'll likely never see that kind of money again.


And honestly, do you REALLY see a Qb where a change of scenery will make the difference, or do you see a QB without the skill set to read defenses, find the open receiver, make the necessary throughs with solid decision making, all traits required of a good NFL QB today?
That's a false statement.

Because if Mark agrees to a trade, his contract can certainly be reworked to accommodate everyone involved. It would be in his best interest to do so, especially if he aspires to continue being a starting QB.
dustykeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:19 AM   #25
Beerfish
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinstar View Post
There're 32 NFL teams and the vast Majority of them don't have a QB. The Bills, The Jags, The Cards, The Titans, The Bucs, The Vikes, The Browns,The Chiefs, The Raiders and Last but not least the Jets. Of those teams, only Mark Sanchez and Josh Freeman are young enough and have shown just enough to make a team contemplate looking at them.


I think that's a big market, and if Sanchez is willing to redo his contract to facilitate a trade, then the market is set.
I'll be ELATED if you are correct but I can't believe any of those teams are that utterly stupid. "Hey, we have bad quarterbacking, lets solve it by getting a worse QB!"
Beerfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:21 AM   #26
dustykeller
America's Hat
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe W. Namath View Post
Mark Sanchez is not an asset. he sucks. Even if he restructured, nobody will want him. The only way he gets another job is when he is off the books and a team can negotiate their own salary with him.
Sanchez isn't a fit with the Jets, that doesn't mean he wouldn't fit elsewhere.


You guys are too emotional. Think about this objectively.
dustykeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:23 AM   #27
Tinstar
Saved,and Thankfull
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delaware
Posts: 5,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruby2 View Post
Bollinger wasn't set to make 8 mill guaranteed though...
That guaranteed Money is Peanuts for an NFL QB. If Sanchez agrees to a New contract with that as a signing bonus spread out over 3 yrs, say for what's left in total if he were on the team this year and next, what's lost.

If this kid is half the QB he thinks he is, all you have to do is load the contract with Incentives easilly meet if he were to win the starting job. Let's say the Raiders were interested in Sanchez. They do this deal, cut Parlmer daft a QB and Let Prior,Sanchez and the Rook battle it our. Does Sanchez have a chance at winning this Job.
Tinstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:27 AM   #28
Ruby2
Patron and Grapefruit Juice Bitchess!!!
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jerseystrong
Posts: 17,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinstar View Post
That guaranteed Money is Peanuts for an NFL QB. If Sanchez agrees to a New contract with that as a signing bonus spread out over 3 yrs, say for what's left in total if he were on the team this year and next, what's lost.

If this kid is half the QB he thinks he is, all you have to do is load the contract with Incentives easilly meet if he were to win the starting job. Let's say the Raiders were interested in Sanchez. They do this deal, cut Parlmer daft a QB and Let Prior,Sanchez and the Rook battle it our. Does Sanchez have a chance at winning this Job.
Or he could take his 8 million guaranteed and compete here i NY where he could very well win the starting job since the Jets can not financially afford legit competition.

I just don't see it, we are stuck with this guy for at least one more year. I've accepted it, you should too, you'll feel better
Ruby2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:28 AM   #29
GuidoYaztremski
Tuukka Rask!!!
All League
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustykeller View Post
That's a false statement.

Because if Mark agrees to a trade, his contract can certainly be reworked to accommodate everyone involved. It would be in his best interest to do so, especially if he aspires to continue being a starting QB.
No. It's not.

If Sanchez believes he can still be a starting QB, and other teams agree, He can still do so in 2014. He's not going to throw away guaranteed money he already has which is almost $9 million for 2013. So how would you propose he gets more than that in a rework and what portion of that do you think the Jets will be willing to swallow to see him go?
GuidoYaztremski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:30 AM   #30
Raider9175
Raider football- JUST FLYNN BABY.
All Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustykeller View Post
Sanchez isn't a fit with the Jets, that doesn't mean he wouldn't fit elsewhere.


You guys are too emotional. Think about this objectively.
Lets save everyone time tell us what team you see Mark Sanchez a good fit for. I* think Mark Sanchez has a better chance running for the Senate against Bob Mendez , than some team trading for him.

What team can sell Mark Sanchez to their fan base and get them excited to actually buy tickets.
Raider9175 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:31 AM   #31
Joe W. Namath
Darrell Bevell for HC in 2014.
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Posts: 7,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustykeller View Post
Sanchez isn't a fit with the Jets, that doesn't mean he wouldn't fit elsewhere.


You guys are too emotional. Think about this objectively.
Ur right. an inaccurate, pick machine, butt fumbler will fit in with many teams.
Joe W. Namath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:32 AM   #32
mphtrilogy
Undrafted Free Agent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 198
there is value there
IF he was a FA.. and you can take a $500k Stanton type flyer on him...

he is untradeable.
mphtrilogy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:34 AM   #33
Tinstar
Saved,and Thankfull
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delaware
Posts: 5,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe W. Namath View Post
Mark Sanchez is not an asset. he sucks. Even if he restructured, nobody will want him. The only way he gets another job is when he is off the books and a team can negotiate their own salary with him.

How did the Eagles get Michael Vick to tear up his contract and sign a 1 year deal. There're 9 teams that can allow Mark Sanchez to take 8 Mill as a signing bonus if he will accept a contract that could allow him the chance to restart his career. Dispite what angry Fans like u want to believe, this kid has tape that shows his potential.
Tinstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:36 AM   #34
dustykeller
America's Hat
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 724
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuidoYaztremski View Post
No. It's not.

If Sanchez believes he can still be a starting QB, and other teams agree, He can still do so in 2014. He's not going to throw away guaranteed money he already has which is almost $9 million for 2013. So how would you propose he gets more than that in a rework and what portion of that do you think the Jets will be willing to swallow to see him go?
Yes, it most certainly is.

I have no idea how they would divvy up the guaranteed portion of his contract. The point i'm trying to make and you're failing to grasp is that it's not out of the realm of possibility.

If the Jets wanted to trade Sanchez, it certainly can happen. There are options (a new contract, a restructured contract, the Jets taking on part of the original guaranteed salary).

You're making an assumption that he's untradeable because of his recent play and his contract. That's a total fallacy....sorry.
dustykeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:38 AM   #35
Rah_Rah_19
The kid is back and better than ever.
Waterboy
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinstar View Post
How did the Eagles get Michael Vick to tear up his contract and sign a 1 year deal. There're 9 teams that can allow Mark Sanchez to take 8 Mill as a signing bonus if he will accept a contract that could allow him the chance to restart his career. Dispite what angry Fans like u want to believe, this kid has tape that shows his potential.
Because they told Vick they were going to cut him unless he reworked his deal. Most of Vick's contract was not guaranteed. The Jets cannot make that kind of credible threat to Sanchez because of the dead money that would result from cutting him now. This isn't that hard to understand. Take off the homer glasses for a second and see the light.
Rah_Rah_19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:39 AM   #36
dustykeller
America's Hat
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe W. Namath View Post
Ur right. an inaccurate, pick machine, butt fumbler will fit in with many teams.
weird....David Carr managed to still be employed with a team other than the Texans despite his ****ty play.


I think Mark Sanchez doesn't belong on the Jets either, but to say he's untradeable is retarded. You're not going to get 3 1st round picks for him, obviously....but he's still got some value. The kid is money in the playoffs. Some team will throw him a bone.
dustykeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:39 AM   #37
Raider9175
Raider football- JUST FLYNN BABY.
All Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinstar View Post
That guaranteed Money is Peanuts for an NFL QB. If Sanchez agrees to a New contract with that as a signing bonus spread out over 3 yrs, say for what's left in total if he were on the team this year and next, what's lost.

If this kid is half the QB he thinks he is, all you have to do is load the contract with Incentives easilly meet if he were to win the starting job. Let's say the Raiders were interested in Sanchez. They do this deal, cut Parlmer daft a QB and Let Prior,Sanchez and the Rook battle it our. Does Sanchez have a chance at winning this Job.
No way the Raiders cut C Palmer. For argument sake lets say that occurred . MOst every Raider fan and management would probably rather go with T Pryor (unknown) than a known commodity in Mark Sanchez.

No one outside of New York, every thought this guy was a good Qb.

Last Point Reggie MCkenzie doesn't like to trade draft picks. That his baby and there is no way he giving a box of footballs for Mark Sanchez.
Raider9175 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:40 AM   #38
PatsFanTX
JI Resident Troll
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 52,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinstar View Post
How did the Eagles get Michael Vick to tear up his contract and sign a 1 year deal. There're 9 teams that can allow Mark Sanchez to take 8 Mill as a signing bonus if he will accept a contract that could allow him the chance to restart his career. Dispite what angry Fans like u want to believe, this kid has tape that shows his potential.
The Eagles could have cut Vick and owed him nothing because there was no guaranteed money in his old contract.

Please name the 9 teams that would give Sanchez $8MM signing bonus.

He's the worst starting QB in the NFL.
PatsFanTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:42 AM   #39
dustykeller
America's Hat
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 724
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanTX View Post
The Eagles could have cut Vick and owed him nothing because there was no guaranteed money in his old contract.

Please name the 9 teams that would give Sanchez $8MM signing bonus.

He's the worst starting QB in the NFL.
For the 200th time, his guaranteed money can be restructured or frontloaded onto a new contract with a new team. Will it happen? I doubt it....but is it possible....of course it is.
dustykeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:43 AM   #40
Beerfish
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustykeller View Post
Sanchez isn't a fit with the Jets, that doesn't mean he wouldn't fit elsewhere.


You guys are too emotional. Think about this objectively.
He is BLOODY AWFUL, that makes him a non fit anywhere. I suppose Jamarcus Russell is just not a good fit in Oakland and could be a good one elsewhere.
Beerfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2013, JetsInsider.com LTD