Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Shocker! Kate Upton Sheds Bikini Top on Leaked Cover - Page 7 - Jets Insider.com Forums

crossfire · 02-14-2013, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlton

Ummm. That's just a bad hair day.

The age progression "Caltron Dance" simulation is even more disturbing.

WestCoastOffensive · 02-14-2013, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John McClane

This.

Just saw this, after my last response. Shouldn't he let it go?

Anyway, I won't continue to respond. If the poster boy for insecurity continues to personally attack me, you can deal with him. I'll just sit back and enjoy the lulz.

the regular posters get it that you were sowell train; and for a time you took a lot of grief. Now you seem to be looking to tune someone up. I don't like this; I won't have it.

WestCoastOffensive · 02-14-2013, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crossfire

The age progression "Caltron Dance" simulation is even more disturbing.

Master Bruce, you have pushed the limits of science!

Alfred, I'm, just getting started, Old Chum.

Fishooked · 02-14-2013, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John McClane

It's never a good position to be in, when you are the only one who cannot see you are wrong.

Keep your chin up. The easy solution here is to post more photos. You've made a fool of yourself, pics of hotties would redeem you.

I've agree to drop the subject at request of the mod, do the same. He's doing you a favor and helping you save face.

a) no one posts better photos of women on this site. NO ONE.

b) this is not the Hotties Thread, so if you want hot pics of women, go there, or Google them.

c) no offense, but I don't know who the hell you are, so I'm prone to taking Borgo's side on this, sorry

and

d) why are we showering more attention on this floozy Kate Upton who probably rooned Sark Manchez is beyond me

Jets Things · 02-14-2013, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fishooked

a) no one posts better photos of women on this site. NO ONE.

b) this is not the Hotties Thread, so if you want hot pics of women, go there, or Google them.

c) no offense, but I don't know who the hell you are, so I'm prone to taking Borgo's side on this, sorry

and

d) why are we showering more attention on this floozy Kate Upton who probably rooned Sark Manchez is beyond me

Fish, don't you ruin another Love Day.

Fishooked · 02-14-2013, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jets Things

Fish, don't you ruin another Love Day.

Did I ruin last years?
I suppose it's possible. Let me ask the wife.

palmetto defender · 02-14-2013, 02:03 PM

Out of curiousity I pulled up Kate Upton for data.
Her official numbers are 33-25-36. A little out of balance, no?
And with a 33 does that mean her boob pics have been photo shopped?

She's fine. But Jane Fonda at 70 is in better shape.

Scott Dierking · 02-14-2013, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by palmetto defender

Out of curiousity I pulled up Kate Upton for data.
Her official numbers are 33-25-36. A little out of balance, no?
And with a 33 does that mean her boob pics have been photo shopped?

She's fine. But Jane Fonda at 70 is in better shape.

Do you understand what the 33 represents?

crossfire · 02-14-2013, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by palmetto defender

Out of curiousity I pulled up Kate Upton for data.
Her official numbers are 33-25-36. A little out of balance, no?
And with a 33 does that mean her boob pics have been photo shopped?

She's fine. But Jane Fonda at 70 is in better shape.

According to the New York Times, she is 5'11", and her measurements are 36"-25"-34".

At 70, Jane Fonda's cooter is probably so dry the crabs carry canteens.

Fishooked · 02-14-2013, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crossfire

According to the New York Times, she is 5'11", and her measurements are 36"-25"-34".

At 70, Jane Fonda's cooter is probably so dry the crabs carry canteens.

Ha ha ha ha

palmetto defender · 02-15-2013, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crossfire

According to the New York Times, she is 5'11", and her measurements are 36"-25"-34".

At 70, Jane Fonda's cooter is probably so dry the crabs carry canteens.

Website I checked had her at 33. The pic is not a 33.
Fonda was hotter at 20. And in better shape now.
She's a commie b*tch that I hate but credit due.

DDNYjets · 02-15-2013, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by palmetto defender

Website I checked had her at 33. The pic is not a 33.
Fonda was hotter at 20. And in better shape now.
She's a commie b*tch that I hate but credit due.

I'll tell you what. You can have Jane Fonda.

Just please never mention her again in this thread.

Fishooked · 02-15-2013, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DDNYjets

I'll tell you what. You can have Jane Fonda.

Just please never mention her again in this thread.

Whatever erection I had is now long gone.

palmetto defender · 02-15-2013, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DDNYjets

I'll tell you what. You can have Jane Fonda.

Just please never mention her again in this thread.

No prob. Had worse. Had better. Than them both. But not famous.

John McClane · 02-15-2013, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlton

Ummm. That's just a bad hair day.

You sure it wasn't a 10 pounds of lard stuck to your chin day? FAT.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WestCoastOffensive

the regular posters get it that you were sowell train; and for a time you took a lot of grief. Now you seem to be looking to tune someone up. I don't like this; I won't have it.

I'm not Sowell Train. I'm John McClane.

I'm also not "tuning up" on anyone. I made a light-hearted post dude, about wanting to see more pics and less critiques, Borgo went nutty because he thought I singled him out. I didn't. Not intentionally, I can see his point, but I assure you I was making a generalization about the direction of the conversation, and not him in particular.

He made it really easy to prod about insecurity, because he massively over-reacted with personal attacks.

Anyway, it's not a big deal really. Not to me, I've got thick enough skin where I can get over being called names on the internet.

Anyway, the Packers mod already asked me to quit it - so not sure why another mod wants to re-open can of worms. Just know, I didn't come into the thread with ill-intentions. Now... is anyone here capable of being funny? Or are we only about man-drama?

John McClane · 02-15-2013, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fishooked

a) no one posts better photos of women on this site. NO ONE.

b) this is not the Hotties Thread, so if you want hot pics of women, go there, or Google them.

c) no offense, but I don't know who the hell you are, so I'm prone to taking Borgo's side on this, sorry

and

d) why are we showering more attention on this floozy Kate Upton who probably rooned Sark Manchez is beyond me

I think his side is that I purposefully trolled him. I didn't.

He over-reacted. Lighten up.

SCITSCAT · 02-15-2013, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frostlich

When the 3D printer is perfected I will never leave my home. Ever.

02-14-2013, 02:03 PM	#127
palmetto defender All League Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 4,687	Out of curiousity I pulled up Kate Upton for data. Her official numbers are 33-25-36. A little out of balance, no? And with a 33 does that mean her boob pics have been photo shopped? She's fine. But Jane Fonda at 70 is in better shape.