Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!
LATEST JI HEADLINES
TOP STORY
How to Decipher OTA Reports
 
5/17 : New Jets RB Goodson Arrested on Drugs and Weapons Charges
5/16 : Joe McKnight Doesn't Appreciate Questioning His Roster Spot
5/15 : QB Garrard to leave Jets
5/15 : uSTADIUM App Looks to Revolutionize Social Sports Media
Go Back   Jets Insider.com Forums > Main Forums > The Landing Strip: All NY Jets and NFL - 24/7 > JetsInsider Draft Forum
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

JetsInsider Draft Forum A forum to discuss all subjects related to the NY Jets and the NFL Draft. Post all of your mock drafts and predictions here. For more detailed info please go to our sister site, www.draftinsider.net!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-15-2013, 03:08 PM   #41
chiefst2000
Champion of Common Sense
All Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Ro 25 View Post
I'm not saying to tank the season. With the addition of Mingo, Barwin, and Rambo, we'd still have a top 10 defense. Quinn still has potential, and I'd rather wait a year for a QB rather than dump all our faith into a mediocre prospect.
I watched Quinn play for KC last season. He does not have potential. The guy is awful. I am of the opinion that Sanchez is mentally shot and any plan that includes him as the Starter is a plan to tank the season. I'm also not convinced that outside of the 1st pick QB Bridgewater that the 2014 QB draft is any better than 2013. For that reason alone the Jets need to try every single year to remedy the QB situation. For me this season I grab Flynn and draft one (Manuel/Bray/Wilson/Nassib) in the 3rd round. Both are low risk moves that dont preclude taking another one in 2014 if necessary.
chiefst2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-15-2013, 03:13 PM   #42
nycdan
I'm tired of pretending I'm not a total b1tchen rock star from Mars.
All League
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Thornwood, NY
Posts: 4,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Ro 25 View Post
I'm not saying to tank the season. With the addition of Mingo, Barwin, and Rambo, we'd still have a top 10 defense. Quinn still has potential, and I'd rather wait a year for a QB rather than dump all our faith into a mediocre prospect.
Brady Quinn has proven over multiple opportunities to be a far worse QB than Sanchez. Gradkowski has a career completion % of 52.9. Neither of these guys is going to magically turn into a good QB. Bringing those dogs in to compete for the starting role is pointless.

And as I said before, dumping two cheap, capable players just to get a team to take Holmes for minimal cap savings doesn't help. It would make more sense to just cut Holmes and keep Wilson and Powell (which I wouldn't do either). That 3rd round Safety isn't worth those two guys.

And yes, some people were less than gentle in reacting to your 'plan' but you're not doing yourself any good by reacting with hostility. Assuming you're right and everyone else is wrong is probably not a good strategy for being taken seriously.
nycdan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2013, 03:23 PM   #43
Laxman
Lookin' for a shred of logic
Undrafted Free Agent
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Ro 25 View Post
2014 is loaded at QB. Manuel and Geno are the only QB's with legit potential. Manuel is a huge risk, and may not fit the WCO, and Geno won't make it to 9. Glennon is highly innacurate, and can't feel pressure, Landry Jones is a mediocre prospect coming off a terrible season. Barkley is another Sanchez. 2014 has Bridgewater, Boyd, Manziel, Murray. This year is all about setting the foundation, and providing weapons. Hopefully Lattimore will be back to 100% in 2014. Jamison reminds me of Rice, Wheaton reminds me of a less injury prone Jeremy Maclin. Brick, Cooper, Mangold is an elite left side of the line.

That is just silly...... the ONLY thing they have in common is USC.
Laxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2013, 05:31 PM   #44
Untouchable
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 22,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laxman View Post
That is just silly...... the ONLY thing they have in common is USC.
Yeah, what an amazing in depth report from a "draft guru" who "constantly watches tape".
Untouchable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2013, 06:14 PM   #45
Mogglez
"Jimmies. We rustle them."-CKC for lyfe
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Ro 25 View Post
2014 is loaded at QB. Manuel and Geno are the only QB's with legit potential. Manuel is a huge risk, and may not fit the WCO, and Geno won't make it to 9. Glennon is highly innacurate, and can't feel pressure, Landry Jones is a mediocre prospect coming off a terrible season. Barkley is another Sanchez. 2014 has Bridgewater, Boyd, Manziel, Murray. This year is all about setting the foundation, and providing weapons. Hopefully Lattimore will be back to 100% in 2014. Jamison reminds me of Rice, Wheaton reminds me of a less injury prone Jeremy Maclin. Brick, Cooper, Mangold is an elite left side of the line.
There is no doubting that this QB crop is weaker than last years but there are still some decent prospects that can be had outside of the first that I feel we should take a flyer on. Unlike most here, I wouldn't mind taking Barkley in the second as I see him as a smarter, and way more more polished version of Sanchez and a perfect fit for the WCO. What people need to remember is Sanchez was a pretty good prospect despite playing only one year so taking a player similar to his skillset is not necessarily a bad thing.

In my eyes Mark didn't pan out because of poor development by the coaches coupled with not being experienced enough in college. Carrol was right, he should have stayed one more year. Regardless, how Mark has fared shouldn't diminish what Barkley has done in his 4 years at USC. People were almost certain he'd be the #1 overall pick this year so the talent and production is definitely there. Then you also got other QB's like Nassib, Tyler Wilson, and Dysert who could be there in the 2nd and possibly even later and IMO all have pretty good potential.

While I really really don't like your approach to free agency you're draft is pretty decent. I really like Jamison too and think he has something to him. However, instead of Lattimore I'd really like to see Stepfan Taylor. Sorry if I came off a bit harsh in my first post.

Last edited by Mogglez; 02-15-2013 at 06:19 PM.
Mogglez is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2013, 08:23 PM   #46
TheMikeIsHot
All Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 7,043
Is there anything worse than a know-it-all who apparently doesn't know much?

Why is this dude is attacking people for being critical of his terrible mock?

When you present Quinn and Gradkowski as options to compete for the starting QB job, you should not be taken seriously.

When you want to trade two good players just so you can dump one of their salaries (and Holmes can be cut next year for nothing), you should not be taken seriously.

When you want to pay an average, one-dimensional TE $6-million a year, you should not be taken seriously.

When you trade a RB who is cheap and has shown some potential for the opportunity to draft an injured RB, you should not be taken seriously. And Jamison is good... you're right there. But he will be taken well before the 5th round. Tony thinks he's a 2nd round prospect.

This is honestly one of the worst off-season plans ever posted here. Everyone else in the thread apparently feels the same way.

Instead of getting all pissy, maybe you just come to grips with the fact that most of your ideas are not very good.
TheMikeIsHot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 04:49 AM   #47
MarkyMarkSanchez
cant wait
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 655
Everyone just needs to chill out and talk football. If you dont agree with an opinion, state yours and then support it. I actually like the draft but like others feel too much is spent in FA in your mock. We need to get away from signing FAs (Tanny Era) and save cap space and picks by drafting young blood. This draft is loaded in the mid rounds it seems.
MarkyMarkSanchez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 05:23 AM   #48
John_0515
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,130
Everything everyone else said.

Not to mention that Barwin won't be signed for a deal that low.
John_0515 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 09:15 AM   #49
patman
happy to be here
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,160
When you start off your post with a implausible trade, the rest of your work is ruined. Carolina is 11 mill over the cap, and they need 5mill for rookies. to absorb 10 mill more in salary they will need to cut 26 mill just to take on Wilson and Holmes. And with the real possibility that Holmes will not play this year, and the likelihood that he starts the year on PUP. Can you see Carolina saying Lets trade for a disgruntled short Wr that needs a 2nd Lis Franc procedure and is guaranteed 8 mill next year. You want to dump salary, Cro is the only chip the jets have.


I guarantee you that Howard will not play in NY for 1.3 mill as a UDFA the jets won't get comp at that level. If the pats lose Vollmer they will give him more than that to back up Cannon.

What makes you think that Sammie Lee Hill is going to be a vet min guy? Because he can't start over Fairley and Suh? A 26 you Old 6-5-325 DT is going to play for vet min? Sure no teams are out looking for young DTs.

Your assigning a 4th rd grade value to Powell the same as when he was drafted after two years of showing that he is not a better starter than Shno greene, why don't they just sign shon Greene and keep the 3rd?
patman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 09:27 AM   #50
patman
happy to be here
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by revischrist View Post
I give Kro a ton of credit for the work and I like the draft picks, but I think there are a few glaring mistakes:
1- Keller- He is not worth the money
2- Trading Kyle, Holmes and Powell for a 3rd? Powell and Kyle are young and could be starters for us this year (assuming we trade Revis or one of our CBs get hurt) so you are effectively trading away 3 starters for a question mark in the third round.
3- I like Braylon, but he gets nothing more than a 1 year deal. No one else in the league wants him
4- Braylon is not a #1 WR and Wheaton may or may not be an NFL WR. So you are giving whoever our QB is another grouping of bad WRs. It takes some 1st round WRs a year or so to adjust to the NFL (took Blackmon half the season). We can't ask a 3rd round pick to step in and start right away.
Just because no one wanted him when he was rehabbing, does not mean no one wants him now. I would love the pats to make a play on Edwards, While he looked rusty he at least showed he was on his way back. I think edwards has positioned himself for a incentive laden deal. A big cheap outside threat is exactly what the pats need. And if your going to sign a one year deal, having Brady throwing you the ball will help pad your stats.

how confident are you that holmes does not start the year on IR recovering from the Liz Franc

Last edited by patman; 02-17-2013 at 09:31 AM.
patman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 09:52 AM   #51
patman
happy to be here
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by John_0515 View Post
Everything everyone else said.

Not to mention that Barwin won't be signed for a deal that low.
He did come off a bad year- you give him 1/2 of the 28 as a guarantee, he may bite. As a 2nd rd pick i don't think he has much of a bankroll and he only had the one big year.
patman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 10:12 AM   #52
patman
happy to be here
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by nycdan View Post
You put a lot of work into this so I don't want to be too critical...

...but you effectively traded Holmes, Wilson and Powell for a 3rd round pick.

Our best WR, our primary nickel back, and the best HB currently on our roster (the last two of whom are on cheap rookie deals)...for a 3rd round pick. Which you used to draft a Safety.

I think that's not improving our team either now or down the road.
I would keep Powell and the 4th, but if you could get 9 mill of cap room by trading a player who is guaranteed 7.75 mill and is recovering from one of the worse injuries a WR could sustain, throwing in Wilson in the last year of his contract is worth it.

he is keeping Cro and wants to keep Revis (assumed since he is not mentioned) with those two guys making 24mill in 2014, do you think wilson is going to be re-signed- I don't. So you lose him for a year. The kid you picked up from detroit would have beaten him out this year IMO.
patman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 10:24 AM   #53
patman
happy to be here
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMarkSanchez View Post
Everyone just needs to chill out and talk football. If you dont agree with an opinion, state yours and then support it. I actually like the draft but like others feel too much is spent in FA in your mock. We need to get away from signing FAs (Tanny Era) and save cap space and picks by drafting young blood. This draft is loaded in the mid rounds it seems.
Besides a couple of extreme jet homers, this is a very civil site. The OP is just too thin skinned and insulted fellow posters who disagreed with him as having no knowledge.

When in his mock off season the lynch pin move is trading a severely injured player who won't even begin his rehab until after the draft- with 2 drug strikes on him, and known as a bad locker room guy with 2 previous teams with a 11mill dollar salary (not cap hit-salary) to a team that is already 11mill over the cap.

When you place that scenario in print and ask fans to comment, you reap what you sow.
patman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2013, JetsInsider.com LTD