Tebow to speak at controversial church

[McGinley]

Originally Posted by Digetydog

That is simply not true. While there is a consensus that people "are gay," the cause is not likely to be 100% genetic. If it were, both identical twins would always be gay or not gay. While there are studies that suggest identical twins are more likely to share sexual orientation, there are none that show 100% correlation.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_2003361.html

The twins argument is stupid because identical twins don't share identical DNA.

[GuidoYaztremski]

Originally Posted by McGinley

The twins argument is stupid because identical twins don't share identical DNA.

exactly....

[Savage69]

Originally Posted by McGinley

The twins argument is stupid because identical twins don't share identical DNA.

But Gay twins could share the same organs..

[McGinley]

Originally Posted by Savage69

But Gay twins could share the same organs..

OHH! CLASSIC SAVAGE!

[DDNYjets]

I wonder how gay Siamese twins would be connected?

[McGinley]

Originally Posted by DDNYjets

I wonder how gay Siamese twins would be connected?

intimately, baby.

"I WANT YOU INSIDE OF ME!"
"I think I already I am..."

[Jungle Shift Jet]

Originally Posted by McGinley

The twins argument is stupid because identical twins don't share identical DNA.

I'm tempted to say this statement is stupid, but it is factually incorrect, today's DNA tests cannot distingush one identical twin's DNA from the other's.

Over time, individual genetic mutations do occur; fingerprints are distinct.