Mike Tannenbaum picks Cordarrelle Paterson for the Jets in his mock draft. - Page 7 - Jets Insider.com Forums

Eckesg1 · 02-24-2013, 12:31 PM

Patterson just went through the speed catch drill and did pretty well. Didn't drop one to my sight.

augustiniak · 02-24-2013, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eckesg1

Patterson just went through the speed catch drill and did pretty well. Didn't drop one to my sight.

forget it. the jets don't need that kind of player. their win total would increase more by drafting guards.

Eckesg1 · 02-24-2013, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by augustiniak

forget it. the jets don't need that kind of player. their win total would increase more by drafting guards.

Is this sarcasm or...

C Mart · 02-24-2013, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eckesg1

Is this sarcasm or...

I'm guessing no. Jets do need OGs and a RT. Without an OL your O isn't doing squat. Are Ducasse and Howard capable. Possible.

augustiniak · 02-24-2013, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eckesg1

Is this sarcasm or...

yes.

Untouchable · 02-24-2013, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by augustiniak

forget it. the jets don't need that kind of player. their win total would increase more by drafting guards.

Patterson isn't worth a Top 10 pick, period.

I'd much rather have someone like Patton, Hunter, Woods, Bailey, etc in the 2nd/3rd round than Patterson at #9.

sec.101row23 · 02-24-2013, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Untouchable

Patterson isn't worth a Top 10 pick, period.

I'd much rather have someone like Patton, Hunter, Woods, Bailey, etc in the 2nd/3rd round than Patterson at #9.

I just dont see the infatuation with this guy. He measured under 6-2, has one year of so-so production at the D1 level, and has suspect hands. Given his sub 6-2 height, he isnt that great of a "speed/size" guy either. To me, he would be a massive reach at 9.

Untouchable · 02-24-2013, 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sec.101row23

I just dont see the infatuation with this guy. He measured under 6-2, has one year of so-so production at the D1 level, and has suspect hands. Given his sub 6-2 height, he isnt that great of a "speed/size" guy either. To me, he would be a massive reach at 9.

I don't get it either. I think best case scenario he's Jeremy Maclin.

I'm not drafting a WR in the Top 10 unless he's a Julio Jones/AJ Green type of prospect. Patterson isn't close to that.

I'm starting to think that not only could Warmack still be on the board at #9, but there's even a chance that someone like Star or Damontre Moore could fall into our laps. No damn way I'm taking Patterson over any of those guys.

sec.101row23 · 02-24-2013, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Untouchable

I don't get it either. I think best case scenario he's Jeremy Maclin.

I'm not drafting a WR in the Top 10 unless he's a Julio Jones/AJ Green type of prospect. Patterson isn't close to that.

I'm starting to think that not only could Warmack still be on the board at #9, but there's even a chance that someone like Star or Damontre Moore could fall into our laps. No damn way I'm taking Patterson over any of those guys.

Moore could fall, would love it if he did. I just dont think Cleveland will pass on him given their switch to the 3-4.

TheMikeIsHot · 02-24-2013, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Untouchable

I don't get it either. I think best case scenario he's Jeremy Maclin.

I'm not drafting a WR in the Top 10 unless he's a Julio Jones/AJ Green type of prospect. Patterson isn't close to that.

I'm starting to think that not only could Warmack still be on the board at #9, but there's even a chance that someone like Star or Damontre Moore could fall into our laps. No damn way I'm taking Patterson over any of those guys.

I wouldn't take Patterson at 9 either. He just doesn't have the body of work.

His potential is so intriguing though. He has truly unique ability in the open field.

legler82 · 02-24-2013, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sec.101row23

I just dont see the infatuation with this guy. He measured under 6-2, has one year of so-so production at the D1 level, and has suspect hands. Given his sub 6-2 height, he isnt that great of a "speed/size" guy either. To me, he would be a massive reach at 9.

While I agree I would not want to see us drafting such a raw player at 9, I do see the infatuation. He's pretty dynamic with the ball in his hands. You generally do not find guys with that kind of elusiveness at his size.

C Mart · 02-25-2013, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doggin94it

Warmack was the only one of those Tannenbaum mocked.

Here was his top 10:

Chiefs: Joeckel
Jags: Milliner
Raiders: Floyd
Eagles: Lotuleilei
Lions: Jordan
Browns: Warmack
Cardinals: Smith
Bills: Vaccaro
Jets: Patterson
Titans: Richardson

That is a truly awful job. Warmack, Joeckel, Lotuleilei, Milliner and potentially Smith are likely to be the only ones of that group in the top 10, and Milliner at 2 is crazy. No Moore, no Jones, no Fisher, no Werner . . . I think it's highly unlikely the Jets have their pick of Moore/Jones/Werner/Mingo/Ansah at 9 - and definitely no chance Dion Jordan goes ahead of all 5 of those.

Pretty clear how much Tannenbaum misses his scouting department

Peter King ‏@SI_PeterKing
If you want the draft's top CB, Dee Milliner, you'll probably have to trade ahead of Detroit at 5 to get him.

Redlichtie · 02-25-2013, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sec.101row23

Moore could fall, would love it if he did. I just dont think Cleveland will pass on him given their switch to the 3-4.

If I'm a betting man my money is on the Browns going Dion Jordan.I just see him fitting there and he's the guy for me who will just keep rising the more this process goes.

If him going high means we get a shot at Damontre then great.If Moore goes there leaving Jordan free at 9 then that too would be a result

Redlichtie · 02-25-2013, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMikeIsHot

I wouldn't take Patterson at 9 either. He just doesn't have the body of work.

His potential is so intriguing though. He has truly unique ability in the open field.

Personally would much rather have Q Patton.

Don't see him being any less of a pro than Patterson and his hustle and hands are exactly what we need and without needing to use a top 10 pick(didn't see how he went yesterday though and even if his numbers disappointed I think he's way underrated)

jetsfan1983 · 02-25-2013, 11:52 AM

Imo, Moore will absolutely be there by our pick. And I wouldn't take him either, and that's forgetting about how bad he was at the combine.

My hopes are still with Ansah and Jordan.

C Mart · 02-26-2013, 12:49 PM

@jetswhispers: Is Cordarrelle a Top 10 pick? #nyj http://t.co/iVqEFib7VX

02-24-2013, 12:31 PM	#121
Eckesg1 All Pro Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 6,352	Patterson just went through the speed catch drill and did pretty well. Didn't drop one to my sight.

02-25-2013, 11:52 AM	#135
jetsfan1983 All Pro Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 5,835	Imo, Moore will absolutely be there by our pick. And I wouldn't take him either, and that's forgetting about how bad he was at the combine. My hopes are still with Ansah and Jordan.

02-26-2013, 12:49 PM	#136
C Mart Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 21,304	@jetswhispers: Is Cordarrelle a Top 10 pick? #nyj http://t.co/iVqEFib7VX