Should Jets trade #94/63/87 and stockpile picks?

Jetman73 · 12-01-2005, 10:25 PM

This would be a classic Parcell's type move....

being resigned to the fact that the entire offense and 75% of the entire teams needs rebuilding/upgrading....

We can actually come away from this draft with 4 #2 picks and 3 #3's....

Add a FA QB and we cut the rebuilding time by 1-2 years without breaking our bank

Megalomaniac · 12-01-2005, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetman73

This would be a classic Parcell's type move....

being resigned to the fact that the entire offense and 75% of the entire teams needs rebuilding/upgrading....

We can actually come away from this draft with 4 #2 picks and 3 #3's....

Add a FA QB and we cut the rebuilding time by 1-2 years without breaking our bank

I love playing madden too!!!

modachewga34 · 12-01-2005, 10:33 PM

trade robertson and lc, no way are you mad

Jetman73 · 12-01-2005, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by modachewga34

trade robertson and lc, no way are you mad

Robertson isnt showing the heart thats needed when the chips are down (like Vilma) His play is sometimes inconsistent, but, he still has a good rep - now would be the best time in his career to trade him.

Coles will want off of this team by the end of next season - you'll see - another 4-12 year and he's gonna want to bolt.

Megalomaniac · 12-01-2005, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetman73

Robertson isnt showing the heart thats needed when the chips are down (like Vilma) His play is sometimes inconsistent, but, he still has a good rep - now would be the best time in his career to trade him.

Coles will want off of this team by the end of next season - you'll see - another 4-12 year and he's gonna want to bolt.

we can't afford to trade either one right now.

Jetman73 · 12-01-2005, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megalomaniac

we can't afford to trade either one right now.

Both Coles and Abe's will blatantly REFUSE to play for a "loser' one year from now....

A preemptive strike for picks instead of lockeroom discontent and nada (in the case of Abe's)

Besides, Coles will not be tradeable by the end of his contract (over 30 receiver)

Megalomaniac · 12-01-2005, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetman73

Both Coles and Abe's will blatantly REFUSE to play for a "loser' one year from now....

A preemptive strike for picks instead of lockeroom discontent and nada (in the case of Abe's)

Besides, Coles will not be tradeable by the end of his contract (over 30 receiver)

ok, i'm not saying that i agree with you, because i don't, but even if that were the case, WE CAN'T AFFORD IT.

Megalomaniac · 12-01-2005, 10:57 PM

good, this was put in the right place.

HuRRiCaNe ViLMa · 12-02-2005, 12:41 AM

I dont think we should do all that.

BTW, Abes # is 56 now.

12-01-2005, 10:25 PM	#1
Jetman73 Hall Of Fame Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,074	Should Jets trade #94/63/87 and stockpile picks? This would be a classic Parcell's type move.... being resigned to the fact that the entire offense and 75% of the entire teams needs rebuilding/upgrading.... We can actually come away from this draft with 4 #2 picks and 3 #3's.... Add a FA QB and we cut the rebuilding time by 1-2 years without breaking our bank

12-01-2005, 10:33 PM	#3
modachewga34 Undrafted Free Agent Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 16	trade robertson and lc, no way are you mad

12-01-2005, 10:57 PM	#8
Megalomaniac All Pro Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Omaha, NE Posts: 8,644	good, this was put in the right place.

12-02-2005, 12:41 AM	#9
HuRRiCaNe ViLMa Rookie Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 51	I dont think we should do all that. BTW, Abes # is 56 now.