Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!
LATEST JI HEADLINES
TOP STORY
How to Decipher OTA Reports
 
5/17 : New Jets RB Goodson Arrested on Drugs and Weapons Charges
5/16 : Joe McKnight Doesn't Appreciate Questioning His Roster Spot
5/15 : QB Garrard to leave Jets
5/15 : uSTADIUM App Looks to Revolutionize Social Sports Media
Go Back   Jets Insider.com Forums > Sports Beyond The NFL > Major League Baseball Talk
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Major League Baseball Talk The Mets and Yankees are front and center here but feel free to discuss all aspects of Major League Baseball here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-09-2008, 11:25 AM   #1
JetPotato
fermenting
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 12,142
SI: Best Players By Number

Guess which team has 8 of the top 25?

http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.c...1/25/index.htm

I'll start with this one: Roberto Alomar over Wade Boggs? Really?
JetPotato is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-09-2008, 11:50 AM   #2
AnthonySerp
All Pro
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Shaolin
Posts: 6,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guido Monzino View Post
Guess which team has 8 of the top 25?

http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.c...1/25/index.htm

I'll start with this one: Roberto Alomar over Wade Boggs? Really?
Alomars repuation is ruined by the god awful years he had with the Mets, but B4 his journey to shea he was a no doubt about it 1st ballot hall of famer.

in their respective primes wade boggs couldnt shine alomars shoes

this comin from an alomar hater


Number 16 is a hard call cause Whitey had the better career but at thje there most dominant stages Gooden was untouchable...imagine the career he would of had if he was semi normal
AnthonySerp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 11:54 AM   #3
Jets N Mets
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 199
#57....K-Rod over Santana.
K-Rod is awesome but i think you have to give it to the 2 Time Cy Young winner over the closer.
Jets N Mets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 12:06 PM   #4
JV51
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,025
Mike Schmidt over Frank Robinson?

No way.
JV51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 12:12 PM   #5
Ven0m
a shutdown poster
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 18,349
They had Boggs in at #26, I would think wearing 2 different numbers would count against him as well. although I'd still have Alomar over him. Prior to his Mets years Alomar was a 1st ballot HOF like Serp said.

PS: Some of the high up numbers are classic. Matt Lawton the best #50? Scott Schoeneweis the best #60?

Last edited by Ven0m; 05-09-2008 at 01:32 PM.
Ven0m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 12:14 PM   #6
Phoenixx
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 6,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonySerp View Post
Number 16 is a hard call cause Whitey had the better career but at thje there most dominant stages Gooden was untouchable...imagine the career he would of had if he was semi normal
Sorry to disappoint you, Anthony, but Whitey Ford over Dwight Gooden is not a hard call at all.
Phoenixx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 12:40 PM   #7
JetPotato
fermenting
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 12,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenixx View Post
Sorry to disappoint you, Anthony, but Whitey Ford over Dwight Gooden is not a hard call at all.
Its laughable, in fact
JetPotato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 01:08 PM   #8
Tyler Durden
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 31,171
Since SI called it "Best Baseball Players by Number"......Mariano Rivera gets 42 over Jackie Robinson.

Last edited by Tyler Durden; 05-09-2008 at 01:10 PM.
Tyler Durden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 01:28 PM   #9
ChadLover
All Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Monmouth County
Posts: 2,137
#0?

That is pretty cool.
ChadLover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 01:44 PM   #10
AnthonySerp
All Pro
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Shaolin
Posts: 6,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChadLover View Post
#0?

That is pretty cool.
i dont remebr rey ordenez wearing 0

OT a lil but how great is it that bob sheppard will not say the word number when he announces someon with the number zero
AnthonySerp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 01:54 PM   #11
chad101
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,463
Derek Jeter over Jimmie Foxx
chad101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:05 PM   #12
ChadLover
All Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Monmouth County
Posts: 2,137
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonySerp View Post
i dont remebr rey ordenez wearing 0

OT a lil but how great is it that bob sheppard will not say the word number when he announces someon with the number zero
So he says, "now batting, zero"?
ChadLover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:07 PM   #13
AnthonySerp
All Pro
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Shaolin
Posts: 6,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChadLover View Post
So he says, "now batting, zero"?
"now batting, double zero, tony clark, double zero"
AnthonySerp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:18 PM   #14
Tyler Durden
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 31,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad101 View Post
Derek Jeter over Jimmie Foxx

Foxx wore the #2 only 1 year (1935)

He wore #3 all the other years. Notice he is the runner-up to Babe Ruth

Last edited by Tyler Durden; 05-09-2008 at 02:23 PM.
Tyler Durden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:23 PM   #15
chad101
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler Durden View Post
Foxx didn't wear #2 the majority of his career. He wore #3 in Boston, which he is mostly known for.
Yeah i see. He shouldn't be included in that article as having been given consideration as there is no comparison between the two players.
chad101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:24 PM   #16
Tyler Durden
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 31,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad101 View Post
Yeah i see. He shouldn't be included in that article as having been given consideration as there is no comparison between the two players.
He got runner up to Babe Ruth, that is where he belongs..
Tyler Durden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:25 PM   #17
chad101
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler Durden View Post
Foxx wore the #2 only 1 year (1935)

He wore #3 all the other years. Notice he is the runner-up to Babe Ruth

Makes sense.
chad101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:54 PM   #18
IM3
SMH
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler Durden View Post
Since SI called it "Best Baseball Players by Number"......Mariano Rivera gets 42 over Jackie Robinson.
Jackie's a top 5 2nd baseman of all time. I'd take that over a closer any day, no matter how dominant that closer was.

Last edited by IM3; 05-09-2008 at 03:22 PM.
IM3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:59 PM   #19
Tyler Durden
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 31,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by IM3 View Post
Jackie's a top 5 2nd baseman of all time. You take that over a closer any day, no matter how dominant that closer was.
I disagree
Tyler Durden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 03:39 PM   #20
Ven0m
a shutdown poster
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 18,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonySerp View Post
i dont remebr rey ordenez wearing 0

OT a lil but how great is it that bob sheppard will not say the word number when he announces someon with the number zero
He did for a while.

Ven0m is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:49 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2013, JetsInsider.com LTD