I hate to be negative...but this sucks!! - Page 3

DE94Abraham · 04-26-2009, 01:03 PM

[QUOTE=Dreamers;3103743]It is not negativity it is truth the Sanchez pick was crap. We do not even run a west coast O. Just because we let Farve do his thing doesn't mean we changed our O. [B]I do not know what kind of O Rex plans on running but we do not have the roaster to switch over, and Sanchez will never be a good fit for us.[/B] We just rebuilt around a spread O and now we are picking up guys that do not run a spread O. What sense does that make. Most people that really know the jets are saying it was a waist. We had the worst draft on the board and Oakland and SD looked like great drafts compared to what we came up with.[/QUOTE]

Good thing you only have 4 posts.

Dont you think that Rex Ryan and Brian Schottenheimer know what kind of offense theyre planning to run. And dont you think maybe....just maybe...they think Sanchez is the right guy to run it... i mean, they drafted him after working him out and getting to know him.

Most people that really know the jets are saying it was a waiste???....who the hell knows the jets more then Ryan, Schotty and Tannenbaum.

jetsNOW! · 04-26-2009, 01:05 PM

[QUOTE=sameoldjets;3103675]

could you imagine if joe willie was in the draft today?[/QUOTE]

Point taken. Namath would likely not only be a bust in today's game, but he'd probably be in jail with pending lawsuits from women in every NFL city.

jayrad01 · 04-26-2009, 01:05 PM

[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103601]How are we a better team than we were on Friday?? On friday we had 3 unproven Qb's on our roster and after today we will have the same. We have a AFC leading rusher on our team and a superstar rb in washington yet we draft a guy that is not that fast that gil brandt didnt even have in his top 100!! I Hate the Sanchez pick, I hate the Green pick even more and all we have left is a 6th round pick to get a WR, DE , TE and offensive line depth.
Yes there will be cuts and guys to sign where we can fill these voids but I for one am not happy at all with only 3 picks and so many needs.[/QUOTE]

Dude every year we are like WTF during the draft. Then the Jets go out and make a trade and we all say oh now I know why they draft a RB when we need a WR. I am confident they have a plan. Hopefully for Boldin. Just chill and have some confidence.

DBAKE · 04-26-2009, 01:06 PM

[QUOTE=HessStation;3103774]I think you might be going through some identity issues.

It's not as much that you don't like the Sanchez pick as much as your reasoning.[/QUOTE]

hess instead of continuing to make smarta$$ remarks try and listen to what i am saying......we are not a better team today then what we were on friday and our hope is that sanchez becomes a franchise QB to which i say the odds are that this will not be the case. i like tanny but wish we would have went after needs such as WR, DE , TE , OL. understand.

simijet · 04-26-2009, 01:06 PM

I think everyone should cut the author of this thread some slack. Tanny has not addressed the biggest needs on this team in this draft. Nor has he added any depth at other positions besides RB. As far as Sanchez is concerned, I live in LA and have watched almost all of his starts. He's a decent QB, and can one day be a good starter in this league [B][COLOR="Red"]BUT[/COLOR][/B] - he is not a savior!

DBAKE · 04-26-2009, 01:10 PM

[QUOTE=jayrad01;3103802]Dude every year we are like WTF during the draft. Then the Jets go out and make a trade and we all say oh now I know why they draft a RB when we need a WR. I am confident they have a plan. Hopefully for Boldin. Just chill and have some confidence.[/QUOTE]

thats what i am hoping for...but when you are done with a draft you are hoping for a guy who can come in and make an impact right away and if sanchez does not win the starting job over the awful Clemens it will be ugly.

JerseyJet80 · 04-26-2009, 01:11 PM

went into the draft needing a good wr and depth on the o/d line, and we will leave the draft with the same needs

way to go jets, another horrible draft

HessStation · 04-26-2009, 01:14 PM

[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103805]hess instead of continuing to make smarta$$ remarks try and listen to what i am saying......we are not a better team today then what we were on friday and our hope is that sanchez becomes a franchise QB to which i say the odds are that this will not be the case. i like tanny but wish we would have went after needs such as WR, DE , TE , OL. understand.[/QUOTE]

So far you've noted:
Sanchez is a bad pick because he is unproven and John D Booty played at USC too. You've given absolutely zero information, stats, or player evaluation to back yourself up other than it's what you think. And yet you expect me or anyone else to give you any credibility???

You don't have to like the pick. But you started a thread about not being a crybaby and all you've done is cry.

DBAKE · 04-26-2009, 01:15 PM

[QUOTE=simijet;3103808]I think everyone should cut the author of this thread some slack. Tanny has not addressed the biggest needs on this team in this draft. Nor has he added any depth at other positions besides RB. As far as Sanchez is concerned, I live in LA and have watched almost all of his starts. He's a decent QB, and can one day be a good starter in this league [B][COLOR="Red"]BUT[/COLOR][/B] - he is not a savior![/QUOTE]

thanks simi....i knew i would be getting the business when i started this thread....but understand some of these guys want sooo bad to believe that we got "the savior" that they cant bare the thought that it might be a bad pick. we shall see.

Dcat · 04-26-2009, 01:16 PM

[QUOTE=SBIII;3103641]Oh ok.

WTF is up with posters saying "Unproven" EVERY ****ING PLAYER in the draft is unproven. NONE have NFL experience.. so what's the difference? It makes zero sense.[/QUOTE]

spot on. I am surprised. Maybe your posts are not completely wothless after all. (j/k dude before you go all hissy)

DBAKE · 04-26-2009, 01:19 PM

[QUOTE=HessStation;3103840]So far you've noted:
Sanchez is a bad pick because he is unproven and John D Booty played at USC too. You've given absolutely zero information, stats, or player evaluation to back yourself up other than it's what you think. And yet you expect me or anyone else to give you any credibility???

You don't have to like the pick. But you started a thread about not being a crybaby and all you've done is cry.[/QUOTE]

i have to sit here and go through stats....thats over with, i watched film, i listested to interviews, i went through history with how picks like this work out. and what gives you credibility...nothing.....i am done with you....move out.

Bubby Brister · 04-26-2009, 01:20 PM

[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103695]10-15 games at USC where they win by 21 points and have stronger faster players at almost every position.....heck john david booty could play well there...oh yeah....nevermind.......he's unproven. make sense?[/QUOTE]

nope. keep trying to make sense though. because, after all, even a blind squirrel can find a nut.

HessStation · 04-26-2009, 01:20 PM

[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103863]i have to sit here and go through stats....thats over with, i watched film, i listested to interviews, i went through history with how picks like this work out. and what gives you credibility...nothing.....i am done with you....move out.[/QUOTE]

LOL, ok I'll pack my bags.

Bubby Brister · 04-26-2009, 01:24 PM

[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103863]i have to sit here and go through stats....thats over with, i watched film, i listested to interviews, i went through history with how picks like this work out. and what gives you credibility...nothing.....i am done with you....move out.[/QUOTE]

seriously, can you please stop digging your own grave?

"went through history with how picks like this work out"...what the hell is that supposed to mean?

DBAKE · 04-26-2009, 01:24 PM

[QUOTE=HessStation;3103867]LOL, ok I'll pack my bags.[/QUOTE]

thought so.

HessStation · 04-26-2009, 01:25 PM

[QUOTE=Bubby Brister;3103879]seriously, can you please stop digging your own grave?

"went through history with how picks like this work out"...what the hell is that supposed to mean?[/QUOTE]

He has no idea.

Dreamers · 04-26-2009, 01:25 PM

[QUOTE=DE94Abraham;3103791]Good thing you only have 4 posts.

Dont you think that Rex Ryan and Brian Schottenheimer know what kind of offense theyre planning to run. And dont you think maybe....just maybe...they think Sanchez is the right guy to run it... i mean, they drafted him after working him out and getting to know him.

Most people that really know the jets are saying it was a waiste???....who the hell knows the jets more then Ryan, Schotty and Tannenbaum.[/QUOTE]

I used to post a lot before I found anther site. Not sure where all my post went.

No I do not if they are drafting hacks like Sanchez. All the kid does is chuck the ball down field. That right their kills 98% of the offense we normally run. I also find it funny how they pick Sanchez because Brian Schottenheimer is on record saying he though Freeman looked better then Sanchez. So yes I do not think the GM is not even listening to his coaches on this one. Tannenbaum should be fire IMO.

DBAKE · 04-26-2009, 01:25 PM

[QUOTE=Bubby Brister;3103879]seriously, can you please stop digging your own grave?

"went through history with how picks like this work out"...what the hell is that supposed to mean?[/QUOTE]

go look up how junior qb's who have 1 year of starting exp. make out in the nfl....report your findings.

Dcat · 04-26-2009, 01:26 PM

[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103863]i have to sit here and go through stats....thats over with, i watched film, i listested to interviews, i went through history with how picks like this work out. and what gives you credibility...nothing.....i am done with you....move out.[/QUOTE]

ummm from what I have read in this thread, the concern about lack of credibility lies elsewhere. :yes:

HessStation · 04-26-2009, 01:27 PM

[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103889]go look up how junior qb's who have 1 year of starting exp. make out in the nfl....report your findings.[/QUOTE]

It's your thread big shot. We're all waiting on you.

04-26-2009, 01:03 PM	#41
DE94Abraham Hall Of Fame Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: New City, NY Posts: 3,036	[QUOTE=Dreamers;3103743]It is not negativity it is truth the Sanchez pick was crap. We do not even run a west coast O. Just because we let Farve do his thing doesn't mean we changed our O. [B]I do not know what kind of O Rex plans on running but we do not have the roaster to switch over, and Sanchez will never be a good fit for us.[/B] We just rebuilt around a spread O and now we are picking up guys that do not run a spread O. What sense does that make. Most people that really know the jets are saying it was a waist. We had the worst draft on the board and Oakland and SD looked like great drafts compared to what we came up with.[/QUOTE] Good thing you only have 4 posts. Dont you think that Rex Ryan and Brian Schottenheimer know what kind of offense theyre planning to run. And dont you think maybe....just maybe...they think Sanchez is the right guy to run it... i mean, they drafted him after working him out and getting to know him. Most people that really know the jets are saying it was a waiste???....who the hell knows the jets more then Ryan, Schotty and Tannenbaum.

04-26-2009, 01:05 PM	#42
jetsNOW! Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 1,179	[QUOTE=sameoldjets;3103675] could you imagine if joe willie was in the draft today?[/QUOTE] Point taken. Namath would likely not only be a bust in today's game, but he'd probably be in jail with pending lawsuits from women in every NFL city.

04-26-2009, 01:05 PM	#43
jayrad01 Veteran Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Cocoa,FL Posts: 2,087	[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103601]How are we a better team than we were on Friday?? On friday we had 3 unproven Qb's on our roster and after today we will have the same. We have a AFC leading rusher on our team and a superstar rb in washington yet we draft a guy that is not that fast that gil brandt didnt even have in his top 100!! I Hate the Sanchez pick, I hate the Green pick even more and all we have left is a 6th round pick to get a WR, DE , TE and offensive line depth. Yes there will be cuts and guys to sign where we can fill these voids but I for one am not happy at all with only 3 picks and so many needs.[/QUOTE] Dude every year we are like WTF during the draft. Then the Jets go out and make a trade and we all say oh now I know why they draft a RB when we need a WR. I am confident they have a plan. Hopefully for Boldin. Just chill and have some confidence.

04-26-2009, 01:06 PM	#44
DBAKE i was right about suckchez Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Hanover, PA Posts: 3,220	[QUOTE=HessStation;3103774]I think you might be going through some identity issues. It's not as much that you don't like the Sanchez pick as much as your reasoning.[/QUOTE] hess instead of continuing to make smarta$$ remarks try and listen to what i am saying......we are not a better team today then what we were on friday and our hope is that sanchez becomes a franchise QB to which i say the odds are that this will not be the case. i like tanny but wish we would have went after needs such as WR, DE , TE , OL. understand.

04-26-2009, 01:06 PM	#45
simijet All League Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Simi Valley, CA Posts: 4,184	I think everyone should cut the author of this thread some slack. Tanny has not addressed the biggest needs on this team in this draft. Nor has he added any depth at other positions besides RB. As far as Sanchez is concerned, I live in LA and have watched almost all of his starts. He's a decent QB, and can one day be a good starter in this league [B][COLOR="Red"]BUT[/COLOR][/B] - he is not a savior!

04-26-2009, 01:10 PM	#46
DBAKE i was right about suckchez Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Hanover, PA Posts: 3,220	[QUOTE=jayrad01;3103802]Dude every year we are like WTF during the draft. Then the Jets go out and make a trade and we all say oh now I know why they draft a RB when we need a WR. I am confident they have a plan. Hopefully for Boldin. Just chill and have some confidence.[/QUOTE] thats what i am hoping for...but when you are done with a draft you are hoping for a guy who can come in and make an impact right away and if sanchez does not win the starting job over the awful Clemens it will be ugly.

04-26-2009, 01:11 PM	#47
JerseyJet80 bring back the beard! All League Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: North Jersey Posts: 2,733	went into the draft needing a good wr and depth on the o/d line, and we will leave the draft with the same needs way to go jets, another horrible draft

04-26-2009, 01:14 PM	#48
HessStation All Pro Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 9,902	[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103805]hess instead of continuing to make smarta$$ remarks try and listen to what i am saying......we are not a better team today then what we were on friday and our hope is that sanchez becomes a franchise QB to which i say the odds are that this will not be the case. i like tanny but wish we would have went after needs such as WR, DE , TE , OL. understand.[/QUOTE] So far you've noted: Sanchez is a bad pick because he is unproven and John D Booty played at USC too. You've given absolutely zero information, stats, or player evaluation to back yourself up other than it's what you think. And yet you expect me or anyone else to give you any credibility??? You don't have to like the pick. But you started a thread about not being a crybaby and all you've done is cry.

04-26-2009, 01:15 PM	#49
DBAKE i was right about suckchez Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Hanover, PA Posts: 3,220	[QUOTE=simijet;3103808]I think everyone should cut the author of this thread some slack. Tanny has not addressed the biggest needs on this team in this draft. Nor has he added any depth at other positions besides RB. As far as Sanchez is concerned, I live in LA and have watched almost all of his starts. He's a decent QB, and can one day be a good starter in this league [B][COLOR="Red"]BUT[/COLOR][/B] - he is not a savior![/QUOTE] thanks simi....i knew i would be getting the business when i started this thread....but understand some of these guys want sooo bad to believe that we got "the savior" that they cant bare the thought that it might be a bad pick. we shall see.

04-26-2009, 01:16 PM	#50
Dcat I think I see one Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 8,097	[QUOTE=SBIII;3103641]Oh ok. WTF is up with posters saying "Unproven" EVERY ****ING PLAYER in the draft is unproven. NONE have NFL experience.. so what's the difference? It makes zero sense.[/QUOTE] spot on. I am surprised. Maybe your posts are not completely wothless after all. (j/k dude before you go all hissy)

04-26-2009, 01:19 PM	#51
DBAKE i was right about suckchez Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Hanover, PA Posts: 3,220	[QUOTE=HessStation;3103840]So far you've noted: Sanchez is a bad pick because he is unproven and John D Booty played at USC too. You've given absolutely zero information, stats, or player evaluation to back yourself up other than it's what you think. And yet you expect me or anyone else to give you any credibility??? You don't have to like the pick. But you started a thread about not being a crybaby and all you've done is cry.[/QUOTE] i have to sit here and go through stats....thats over with, i watched film, i listested to interviews, i went through history with how picks like this work out. and what gives you credibility...nothing.....i am done with you....move out.

04-26-2009, 01:20 PM	#52
Bubby Brister All Pro Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 1,905	[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103695]10-15 games at USC where they win by 21 points and have stronger faster players at almost every position.....heck john david booty could play well there...oh yeah....nevermind.......he's unproven. make sense?[/QUOTE] nope. keep trying to make sense though. because, after all, even a blind squirrel can find a nut.

04-26-2009, 01:24 PM	#54
Bubby Brister All Pro Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 1,905	[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103863]i have to sit here and go through stats....thats over with, i watched film, i listested to interviews, i went through history with how picks like this work out. and what gives you credibility...nothing.....i am done with you....move out.[/QUOTE] seriously, can you please stop digging your own grave? "went through history with how picks like this work out"...what the hell is that supposed to mean?

04-26-2009, 01:25 PM	#56
HessStation All Pro Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 9,902	[QUOTE=Bubby Brister;3103879]seriously, can you please stop digging your own grave? "went through history with how picks like this work out"...what the hell is that supposed to mean?[/QUOTE] He has no idea.

04-26-2009, 01:25 PM	#57
Dreamers The angry poster All League Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 4,396	[QUOTE=DE94Abraham;3103791]Good thing you only have 4 posts. Dont you think that Rex Ryan and Brian Schottenheimer know what kind of offense theyre planning to run. And dont you think maybe....just maybe...they think Sanchez is the right guy to run it... i mean, they drafted him after working him out and getting to know him. Most people that really know the jets are saying it was a waiste???....who the hell knows the jets more then Ryan, Schotty and Tannenbaum.[/QUOTE] I used to post a lot before I found anther site. Not sure where all my post went. No I do not if they are drafting hacks like Sanchez. All the kid does is chuck the ball down field. That right their kills 98% of the offense we normally run. I also find it funny how they pick Sanchez because Brian Schottenheimer is on record saying he though Freeman looked better then Sanchez. So yes I do not think the GM is not even listening to his coaches on this one. Tannenbaum should be fire IMO.

04-26-2009, 01:26 PM	#59
Dcat I think I see one Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 8,097	[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103863]i have to sit here and go through stats....thats over with, i watched film, i listested to interviews, i went through history with how picks like this work out. and what gives you credibility...nothing.....i am done with you....move out.[/QUOTE] ummm from what I have read in this thread, the concern about lack of credibility lies elsewhere. :yes:

04-26-2009, 01:27 PM	#60
HessStation All Pro Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 9,902	[QUOTE=DBAKE;3103889]go look up how junior qb's who have 1 year of starting exp. make out in the nfl....report your findings.[/QUOTE] It's your thread big shot. We're all waiting on you.