Fox News - If You Believed Us Yesterday, You're an Idiot - Page 3

32green · 07-23-2010, 10:19 PM

[QUOTE=PlumberKhan;3653995]Admit it, Fish. This place is nothing but a series of sad disappointments compounded by more disappointments.[/QUOTE]

Lmao....every time I post in it, I get a little sadder.

:D

Tucker134 · 07-23-2010, 10:39 PM

[QUOTE=PlumberKhan;3653453]You raped a child.

You raped a child too.

So, we're even?[/QUOTE]

dude why would you make comparisons to such disgusting acts? You're a sick phuck

32green · 07-23-2010, 10:53 PM

[QUOTE=Tucker134;3654291]dude why would you make comparisons to such disgusting acts? You're a sick phuck[/QUOTE]

He's lost weight....he's anemic.

Other than this, he's really a good guy.

;)

JetsFan2012 · 07-24-2010, 01:09 AM

[QUOTE=cr726;3654085]She's biased? She seems to bring on a lot of people who disagree with her.[/QUOTE]

I don't watch her show on a regular enough basis to see the caliber of her guests, but I would say she [I]definitely[/I] has a set agenda. It's certainly not middle-of-the-road commentary.

She's comes off as sarcastic and snotty and pretentious, all while wearing her sexual preference like an overt badge of honor; I really don't see why anyone would find her appealing.

Tyler Durden · 07-24-2010, 01:49 AM

[QUOTE=pauliec;3654382]I don't watch her show on a regular enough basis to see the caliber of her guests, but I would say she [I]definitely[/I] has a set agenda. It's certainly not middle-of-the-road commentary.

She's comes off as sarcastic and snotty and pretentious, all while wearing her sexual preference like an overt badge of honor; I really don't see why anyone would find her appealing.[/QUOTE]

She's definitely liberal, she doesn't hide that, but she does bring on opposing views and is willing to debate, unlike that egomaniac Keith Olberman, who wouldn't dare have anyone with an opposing view on his show. I really don't understand why any liberal would like him... he acts like a child.

southparkcpa · 07-24-2010, 08:06 AM

[QUOTE=cr726;3654085]She's biased? She seems to bring on a lot of people who disagree with her.[/QUOTE]

of course she's wrong so often.

Jungle Shift Jet · 07-24-2010, 02:31 PM

[QUOTE=cr726;3653908]Was the Journo-list site just for them to vent their true views and keep it amongst themselves?

I read McClatchy for real news, they seem to be the only site who actually reports news and doesn't sensationalize nonsense.

News is dead, it didn't make any money, thanks capitolism! :D
[/QUOTE]

Journ-o-list was not created to keep views private. It was created to collude on GOP smears and suppress criticism of B. Hussein. The "o" stood for Obama as it was expressly created to give him support.

News is not dead yet as it's transforming from print to online. Consumers vote w/ their wallets and if lib papers give an uncritically monolithic view they can't all survive.

In an industry dominated by the left-wing and advocacy journalism vs the investigative kind, McClatchy is so far left you've only got the Daily Worker, Pravda & NYT ahead of it. They couldn't make a go of it in Philly, go figure...

cr726 · 07-25-2010, 11:01 AM

[QUOTE=Jungle Shift Jet;3654679]Journ-o-list was not created to keep views private. It was created to collude on GOP smears and suppress criticism of B. Hussein. The "o" stood for Obama as it was expressly created to give him support.

News is not dead yet as it's transforming from print to online. Consumers vote w/ their wallets and if lib papers give an uncritically monolithic view they can't all survive.

In an industry dominated by the left-wing and advocacy journalism vs the investigative kind, McClatchy is so far left you've only got the Daily Worker, Pravda & NYT ahead of it. They couldn't make a go of it in Philly, go figure...[/QUOTE]

This is the same site that ripped Olberman? Seems like a bunch of writers wanted to b!tch to each other and pretend they are more important than they will ever be.
Sounds like??????????????????????????

cr726 · 07-25-2010, 11:02 AM

[QUOTE=pauliec;3654382]I[B] don't watch her show on a regular enough basis to see the caliber of her guests[/B], but I would say she [I]definitely[/I] has a set agenda. It's certainly not middle-of-the-road commentary.

She's comes off as sarcastic and snotty and pretentious, all while wearing her sexual preference like an overt badge of honor; I really don't see why anyone would find her appealing.[/QUOTE]

You come up with the conclusion because you do not watch?

JetsFan2012 · 07-25-2010, 01:02 PM

[QUOTE=cr726;3655121]You come up with the conclusion because you do not watch?[/QUOTE]

I've definitely see the show more than once or twice a month, and I see clip of her commentary online all the time.

Raider9175 · 07-28-2010, 10:32 AM

[QUOTE=cr726;3655121]You come up with the conclusion because you do not watch?[/QUOTE]

Newsflash. No one is watching them? Hmm Why is that? More people in Oakland(blackouts) have watched Raider games, than have people watch those liberal stations. Its all jealously because for some reason everyone seems to be watching Fox. Maybe get some attractive woman reporters and not woman who want to be a man.

Come Back to NY · 07-28-2010, 11:25 AM

[QUOTE=Green Jets & Ham;3658031]Just the fact that MSNBC would actually hire an absolute freak show like Rachel Maddow and give her her own show, in primetime no less, tells you the type of absolute nut cases they have running that network.

You have to be sick in the head to do that, and I mean seriously depraved, not to mention as detached from reality and the American people as is humanly possible.

That's not even a leftist decision ... its detached and depraved.[/QUOTE]

they tried to hire rosie o'donnell before giving the job to the other lesbo....

[url]http://www.talkleft.com/story/2007/11/6/12922/0263[/url]

Tyler Durden · 07-28-2010, 12:56 PM

[QUOTE=Green Jets & Ham;3658031]Just the fact that MSNBC would actually hire an absolute freak show like Rachel Maddow and give her her own show, in primetime no less, tells you the type of absolute nut cases they have running that network.

You have to be sick in the head to do that, and I mean seriously depraved, not to mention as detached from reality and the American people as is humanly possible.

That's not even a leftist decision ... its detached and depraved.[/QUOTE]

Why is she a freak show? Because she's a lesbian?

.... you don't even care how bigoted you are, good for you.

quantum · 07-28-2010, 04:09 PM

[QUOTE=Green Jets & Ham;3658242]
Now if they hired a nice lipstick lesbian people might actually watch that network for a change[/QUOTE]

:yes:

but I might turn the volume way down

Raider9175 · 07-28-2010, 04:46 PM

[QUOTE=Tyler Durden;3658239]Why is she a freak show? Because she's a lesbian?

.... you don't even care how bigoted you are, good for you.[/QUOTE]

You want to know why nobody watches Msnbc or Cnn. Its not because were bigoted(classic liberal response to call some a bigot or racist- its getting real old)

Here is why. This video clip is classic and why no one takes that network seriously.
[url]http://www.mofopolitics.com/2010/01/20/video-liberal-wacko-chris-matthews-vs-psychotic-socialist-howard-dean/[/url]

Tyler Durden · 07-28-2010, 04:56 PM

[QUOTE=Raider9175;3658641]You want to know why nobody watches Msnbc or Cnn. Its not because were bigoted(classic liberal response to call some a bigot or racist- its getting real old)

Here is why. This video clip is classic and why no one takes that network seriously.
[url]http://www.mofopolitics.com/2010/01/20/video-liberal-wacko-chris-matthews-vs-psychotic-socialist-howard-dean/[/url][/QUOTE]

I was talking about Rachel Maddow, I'm not very interested in your opinion of a cable network.

Ham has intolerance towards homosexuals, I'm sure he would admit that, at this point, why wouldn't he? and that is the very definition of bigotry.

Warfish · 07-28-2010, 05:04 PM

[QUOTE=Tyler Durden;3658657]I was talking about Rachel Maddow, I'm not very interested in your opinion of a cable network.

Ham is clearly intolerant to gay people, I'm sure he would admit that, at this point, why wouldn't he? and that is the very definition of bigotry.[/QUOTE]

Freedom includes the Freedom to be intellectually intolerant. Ham (or anyone) can dislike homosexuals (or anyone else for whatever reason suits him) as much as he likes.

If he descriminates (i.e breaks the law) then he's shafted. Otherwise, it's his right to dislike anyone he wishes for whatever he wishes. And in fairness, a religious-based disagreement (intolerance) with homosexuallity is a long-held ideal. About 3000 years long, matter of fact.

Tyler Durden · 07-28-2010, 05:07 PM

[QUOTE=Warfish;3658669]Freedom includes the Freedom to be intellectually intolerant. Ham (or anyone) can dislike homosexuals (or anyone else for whatever reason suits him) as much as he likes.

If he descriminates (i.e breaks the law) then he's shafted. Otherwise, it's his right to dislike anyone he wishes for whatever he wishes. And in fairness, a religious-based disagreement (intolerance) with homosexuallity is a long-held ideal. About 3000 years long, matter of fact.[/QUOTE]

I agree with all this, I'm also free to call him out on it, and just because it's repeated over and over, and you're sick of hearing it, that doesn't make it any less true.

Come Back to NY · 07-28-2010, 05:12 PM

[QUOTE=Tyler Durden;3658678]I agree with all this, I'm also free to call him out on it, and just because it's repeated over and over, and you're sick of hearing it, that doesn't make it any less true.[/QUOTE]

oh- so you mean just because someone screams "racist" at others over and over again that means it is true despite the facts??? LOL....

Tyler Durden · 07-28-2010, 05:16 PM

[QUOTE=Come Back to NY;3658689]oh- so you mean just because someone screams "racist" at others over and over again that means it is true despite the facts??? LOL....[/QUOTE]

No.

07-24-2010, 01:49 AM	#45
Tyler Durden Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 31,171	[QUOTE=pauliec;3654382]I don't watch her show on a regular enough basis to see the caliber of her guests, but I would say she [I]definitely[/I] has a set agenda. It's certainly not middle-of-the-road commentary. She's comes off as sarcastic and snotty and pretentious, all while wearing her sexual preference like an overt badge of honor; I really don't see why anyone would find her appealing.[/QUOTE] She's definitely liberal, she doesn't hide that, but she does bring on opposing views and is willing to debate, unlike that egomaniac Keith Olberman, who wouldn't dare have anyone with an opposing view on his show. I really don't understand why any liberal would like him... he acts like a child. Last edited by Tyler Durden; 07-24-2010 at 01:54 AM.

07-28-2010, 12:56 PM	#53
Tyler Durden Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 31,171	[QUOTE=Green Jets & Ham;3658031]Just the fact that MSNBC would actually hire an absolute freak show like Rachel Maddow and give her her own show, in primetime no less, tells you the type of absolute nut cases they have running that network. You have to be sick in the head to do that, and I mean seriously depraved, not to mention as detached from reality and the American people as is humanly possible. That's not even a leftist decision ... its detached and depraved.[/QUOTE] Why is she a freak show? Because she's a lesbian? .... you don't even care how bigoted you are, good for you. Last edited by Tyler Durden; 07-28-2010 at 01:02 PM.

07-28-2010, 04:56 PM	#56
Tyler Durden Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 31,171	[QUOTE=Raider9175;3658641]You want to know why nobody watches Msnbc or Cnn. Its not because were bigoted(classic liberal response to call some a bigot or racist- its getting real old) Here is why. This video clip is classic and why no one takes that network seriously. [url]http://www.mofopolitics.com/2010/01/20/video-liberal-wacko-chris-matthews-vs-psychotic-socialist-howard-dean/[/url][/QUOTE] I was talking about Rachel Maddow, I'm not very interested in your opinion of a cable network. Ham has intolerance towards homosexuals, I'm sure he would admit that, at this point, why wouldn't he? and that is the very definition of bigotry. Last edited by Tyler Durden; 07-28-2010 at 05:02 PM.

07-28-2010, 05:07 PM	#58
Tyler Durden Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 31,171	[QUOTE=Warfish;3658669]Freedom includes the Freedom to be intellectually intolerant. Ham (or anyone) can dislike homosexuals (or anyone else for whatever reason suits him) as much as he likes. If he descriminates (i.e breaks the law) then he's shafted. Otherwise, it's his right to dislike anyone he wishes for whatever he wishes. And in fairness, a religious-based disagreement (intolerance) with homosexuallity is a long-held ideal. About 3000 years long, matter of fact.[/QUOTE] I agree with all this, I'm also free to call him out on it, and just because it's repeated over and over, and you're sick of hearing it, that doesn't make it any less true. Last edited by Tyler Durden; 07-28-2010 at 05:09 PM.

07-23-2010, 10:19 PM	#41
32green The original road-kill pus slurper. MMMmmm pus. Board Moderator Jets Insider VIP JetsInsider.com Legend Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: The depths of Despair. Posts: 37,672	[QUOTE=PlumberKhan;3653995]Admit it, Fish. This place is nothing but a series of sad disappointments compounded by more disappointments.[/QUOTE] Lmao....every time I post in it, I get a little sadder. :D

07-23-2010, 10:39 PM	#42
Tucker134 Let's go Isles! All League Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: NYC Posts: 2,986	[QUOTE=PlumberKhan;3653453]You raped a child. You raped a child too. So, we're even?[/QUOTE] dude why would you make comparisons to such disgusting acts? You're a sick phuck

07-23-2010, 10:53 PM	#43
32green The original road-kill pus slurper. MMMmmm pus. Board Moderator Jets Insider VIP JetsInsider.com Legend Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: The depths of Despair. Posts: 37,672	[QUOTE=Tucker134;3654291]dude why would you make comparisons to such disgusting acts? You're a sick phuck[/QUOTE] He's lost weight....he's anemic. Other than this, he's really a good guy. ;)

07-24-2010, 01:09 AM	#44
JetsFan2012 Waterboy Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 0	[QUOTE=cr726;3654085]She's biased? She seems to bring on a lot of people who disagree with her.[/QUOTE] I don't watch her show on a regular enough basis to see the caliber of her guests, but I would say she [I]definitely[/I] has a set agenda. It's certainly not middle-of-the-road commentary. She's comes off as sarcastic and snotty and pretentious, all while wearing her sexual preference like an overt badge of honor; I really don't see why anyone would find her appealing.

07-24-2010, 08:06 AM	#46
southparkcpa I see the 88 to 97 period all over again. Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: NC Posts: 15,755	[QUOTE=cr726;3654085]She's biased? She seems to bring on a lot of people who disagree with her.[/QUOTE] of course she's wrong so often.

07-24-2010, 02:31 PM	#47
Jungle Shift Jet Occasionally stoops to uploading hotties pix to boost his postcount All Pro Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alive with a superior intellect in an erudite world of fine tastes that you will never, EVER acquire Posts: 5,045	[QUOTE=cr726;3653908]Was the Journo-list site just for them to vent their true views and keep it amongst themselves? I read McClatchy for real news, they seem to be the only site who actually reports news and doesn't sensationalize nonsense. News is dead, it didn't make any money, thanks capitolism! :D [/QUOTE] Journ-o-list was not created to keep views private. It was created to collude on GOP smears and suppress criticism of B. Hussein. The "o" stood for Obama as it was expressly created to give him support. News is not dead yet as it's transforming from print to online. Consumers vote w/ their wallets and if lib papers give an uncritically monolithic view they can't all survive. In an industry dominated by the left-wing and advocacy journalism vs the investigative kind, McClatchy is so far left you've only got the Daily Worker, Pravda & NYT ahead of it. They couldn't make a go of it in Philly, go figure...

07-25-2010, 11:01 AM	#48
cr726 Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 13,329	[QUOTE=Jungle Shift Jet;3654679]Journ-o-list was not created to keep views private. It was created to collude on GOP smears and suppress criticism of B. Hussein. The "o" stood for Obama as it was expressly created to give him support. News is not dead yet as it's transforming from print to online. Consumers vote w/ their wallets and if lib papers give an uncritically monolithic view they can't all survive. In an industry dominated by the left-wing and advocacy journalism vs the investigative kind, McClatchy is so far left you've only got the Daily Worker, Pravda & NYT ahead of it. They couldn't make a go of it in Philly, go figure...[/QUOTE] This is the same site that ripped Olberman? Seems like a bunch of writers wanted to b!tch to each other and pretend they are more important than they will ever be. Sounds like??????????????????????????

07-25-2010, 11:02 AM	#49
cr726 Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 13,329	[QUOTE=pauliec;3654382]I[B] don't watch her show on a regular enough basis to see the caliber of her guests[/B], but I would say she [I]definitely[/I] has a set agenda. It's certainly not middle-of-the-road commentary. She's comes off as sarcastic and snotty and pretentious, all while wearing her sexual preference like an overt badge of honor; I really don't see why anyone would find her appealing.[/QUOTE] You come up with the conclusion because you do not watch?

07-25-2010, 01:02 PM	#50
JetsFan2012 Waterboy Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 0	[QUOTE=cr726;3655121]You come up with the conclusion because you do not watch?[/QUOTE] I've definitely see the show more than once or twice a month, and I see clip of her commentary online all the time.

07-28-2010, 10:32 AM	#51
Raider9175 Raider football- JUST FLYNN BABY. All Pro Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,305	[QUOTE=cr726;3655121]You come up with the conclusion because you do not watch?[/QUOTE] Newsflash. No one is watching them? Hmm Why is that? More people in Oakland(blackouts) have watched Raider games, than have people watch those liberal stations. Its all jealously because for some reason everyone seems to be watching Fox. Maybe get some attractive woman reporters and not woman who want to be a man.

07-28-2010, 11:25 AM	#52
Come Back to NY Making lotsa $$$ off obama's stupidity... Jets Insider VIP JetsInsider.com Legend Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 31,407	[QUOTE=Green Jets & Ham;3658031]Just the fact that MSNBC would actually hire an absolute freak show like Rachel Maddow and give her her own show, in primetime no less, tells you the type of absolute nut cases they have running that network. You have to be sick in the head to do that, and I mean seriously depraved, not to mention as detached from reality and the American people as is humanly possible. That's not even a leftist decision ... its detached and depraved.[/QUOTE] they tried to hire rosie o'donnell before giving the job to the other lesbo.... [url]http://www.talkleft.com/story/2007/11/6/12922/0263[/url]

07-28-2010, 04:09 PM	#54
quantum GFY Snatchez! Hall Of Fame Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: LI Posts: 17,905	[QUOTE=Green Jets & Ham;3658242] Now if they hired a nice lipstick lesbian people might actually watch that network for a change[/QUOTE] :yes: but I might turn the volume way down

07-28-2010, 04:46 PM	#55
Raider9175 Raider football- JUST FLYNN BABY. All Pro Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,305	[QUOTE=Tyler Durden;3658239]Why is she a freak show? Because she's a lesbian? .... you don't even care how bigoted you are, good for you.[/QUOTE] You want to know why nobody watches Msnbc or Cnn. Its not because were bigoted(classic liberal response to call some a bigot or racist- its getting real old) Here is why. This video clip is classic and why no one takes that network seriously. [url]http://www.mofopolitics.com/2010/01/20/video-liberal-wacko-chris-matthews-vs-psychotic-socialist-howard-dean/[/url]

07-28-2010, 05:04 PM	#57
Warfish JetsInsider.com Legend Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 35,000	[QUOTE=Tyler Durden;3658657]I was talking about Rachel Maddow, I'm not very interested in your opinion of a cable network. Ham is clearly intolerant to gay people, I'm sure he would admit that, at this point, why wouldn't he? and that is the very definition of bigotry.[/QUOTE] Freedom includes the Freedom to be intellectually intolerant. Ham (or anyone) can dislike homosexuals (or anyone else for whatever reason suits him) as much as he likes. If he descriminates (i.e breaks the law) then he's shafted. Otherwise, it's his right to dislike anyone he wishes for whatever he wishes. And in fairness, a religious-based disagreement (intolerance) with homosexuallity is a long-held ideal. About 3000 years long, matter of fact.

07-28-2010, 05:12 PM	#59
Come Back to NY Making lotsa $$$ off obama's stupidity... Jets Insider VIP JetsInsider.com Legend Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 31,407	[QUOTE=Tyler Durden;3658678]I agree with all this, I'm also free to call him out on it, and just because it's repeated over and over, and you're sick of hearing it, that doesn't make it any less true.[/QUOTE] oh- so you mean just because someone screams "racist" at others over and over again that means it is true despite the facts??? LOL....

07-28-2010, 05:16 PM	#60
Tyler Durden Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 31,171	[QUOTE=Come Back to NY;3658689]oh- so you mean just because someone screams "racist" at others over and over again that means it is true despite the facts??? LOL....[/QUOTE] No.