If we lose one of our top two WR's this offseason:

LockeJET · 12-21-2010, 01:17 PM

I'd be on board bringing in T.O. The Bengals have said they won't resign him.

72 catches for 983 yards and nine touchdowns after 14 games.

Call me crazy but I think at this point bringing him in on a 1 year incentive type deal is a win win.

I'd only consider this if we lose Braylon or Santonio.

I realize he runs his mouth at times but the guy is a baller. He brings it each and every Sunday.

Gibby · 12-21-2010, 01:18 PM

NO ****ING WAY!!!!!!!!!

Sourceworx · 12-21-2010, 01:19 PM

We still have Cotchery. Santonio/Cotch or Braylon/Cotch is still a solid duo. We can draft a young guy to use as our #3.

IRONFAN 40 · 12-21-2010, 01:24 PM

Rather draft a speedy slot receiver then go with that old geezer..

Sourceworx · 12-21-2010, 01:25 PM

[QUOTE=IRONFAN 40;3874965]Rather draft a speedy slot receiver then go with that old geezer..[/QUOTE]

Agreed.

Johnny Rico · 12-21-2010, 01:28 PM

[QUOTE=IRONFAN 40;3874965]Rather draft a speedy slot receiver then go with that old geezer..[/QUOTE]

+1

What Sanchez needs is someone who is [I]always[/I] open on third down. Hate to say this, but he needs someone like Welker. Someone he can rely on to know where the holes in the zone are, attack them and push the sticks.

jetsfan1983 · 12-21-2010, 01:29 PM

No TO please...

Ocho I'd be fine with but I truly think that TO brings bad mojo to the lockerroom. Ocho goofs around but he's OK if they are winning. TO clowns around but he's not OK if he isn't getting his touches, even if the team is winning.

jetlifer · 12-21-2010, 01:29 PM

[COLOR="Red"][SIZE="7"]NO WAY[/SIZE][/COLOR]

JetPotato · 12-21-2010, 01:30 PM

Is the goal to be on Hard Knocks every season?

Or to win?

Vin · 12-21-2010, 01:35 PM

[QUOTE=JetPotato;3874976]Is the goal to be on Hard Knocks every season?

Or to win?[/QUOTE]

You have to wonder...had the Jets NOT been on Hard Knocks, you think they would be getting this much vitriol by everyone? Doubt it.

Heck, I bet the Braylon DUI situation would've been swept under the rug like many of the other cases...

Oh and Cotchery still has TWO YEARS left on his deal and it's about $4 Million dollars. If they cut him, the Jets only save about $450,000 dollars. So I think they have him restructure his contract which would help in re-signing both Tone and Bray-Bray.

Limolady · 12-21-2010, 01:44 PM

Terrell is an "O" but my WR corps for 2011 is as follows:

Jerricho, Santonio and [B]Plaxico[/B].

Don't forget this guy is due to be sprung from the Big House in April. I can also tell you that he will come out with a HUGE chip on his shoulder, he feels he was "made an example of", "did nothing wrong, but shoot himself" and will play like an NFL beast for any team willing to take a 2nd chance on him.

The Jets blew the load with passing on Mike Vick and we're all witnesses to how that's working out. For the Eagles.

Get Me Plaxico Cappy. Make It Happen. :yes:

Vin · 12-21-2010, 01:53 PM

[QUOTE=Limolady;3874999]Terrell is an "O" but my WR corps for 2011 is as follows:

Jerricho, Santonio and [B]Plaxico[/B].

Don't forget this guy is due to be sprung from the Big House in April. I can also tell you that he will come out with a HUGE chip on his shoulder, he feels he was "made an example of", "did nothing wrong, but shoot himself" and will play like an NFL beast for any team willing to take a 2nd chance on him.

The Jets blew the load with passing on Mike Vick and we're all witnesses to how that's working out. For the Eagles.

Get Me Plaxico Cappy. Make It Happen. :yes:[/QUOTE]

Plaxico 34 next year

Brayon 28.

Sorry but give me the Younger WR who would grow with Sanchez and who WON'T Cause Trouble like Plaxico does.

Santonio · 12-21-2010, 02:06 PM

[QUOTE=LockeJET;3874945]I'd be on board bringing in T.O. The Bengals have said they won't resign him.

72 catches for 983 yards and nine touchdowns after 14 games.

[B]Call me crazy [/B]but I think at this point bringing him in on a 1 year incentive type deal is a win win.

I'd only consider this if we lose Braylon or Santonio.

I realize he runs his mouth at times but the guy is a baller. He brings it each and every Sunday.[/QUOTE]

i'll oblige. You are crazy. Nuts as well.

Much ado about Nothing · 12-21-2010, 02:09 PM

Nope.

Much rather draft someone or sign a young FA...

JetStream · 12-21-2010, 02:10 PM

[SIZE=6]Crazy[/SIZE]...there I did it...

frankiepapa · 12-21-2010, 02:16 PM

We are forgetting about Randy Moss!!

Vin · 12-21-2010, 02:28 PM

[QUOTE=frankiepapa;3875067]We are forgetting about Randy Moss!![/QUOTE]

Good. 'Cause it's better if he stays forgotten.

Gibby · 12-21-2010, 02:30 PM

[QUOTE=Vin;3875016]Plaxico 34 next year

Brayon 28.

Sorry but give me the Younger WR who would grow with Sanchez and who WON'T Cause Trouble like Plaxico does.[/QUOTE]

Totally agree. I am one of the few around here who actually would keep Braylon over Holmes. To me he has more of an up side. Holmes is a small target. Edwards has improved by leaps and bounds from his 2009 "year of the drop".

I against I · 12-21-2010, 02:36 PM

[QUOTE=LockeJET;3874945]I'd be on board bringing in T.O. The Bengals have said they won't resign him.

72 catches for 983 yards and nine touchdowns after 14 games.

Call me crazy but I think at this point bringing him in on a 1 year incentive type deal is a win win.

I'd only consider this if we lose Braylon or Santonio.

I realize he runs his mouth at times but the guy is a baller. He brings it each and every Sunday.[/QUOTE]

I was thinking the same thing last nite. Knowing you, you were probably smoking sorta the same thing I was. Happy Holidays!!

njherdfan · 12-21-2010, 02:41 PM

I have no doubts that TO will be a good player next year, but he would not do well with Sanchez. Sanchez has already shown he has a tendency to force passes to covered receivers, and I imagine that would only get worse if TO was constantly demanding the ball.

12-21-2010, 01:17 PM	#1
LockeJET pooping, but thinking of you! Hall of Fame Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 15,957	If we lose one of our top two WR's this offseason: I'd be on board bringing in T.O. The Bengals have said they won't resign him. 72 catches for 983 yards and nine touchdowns after 14 games. Call me crazy but I think at this point bringing him in on a 1 year incentive type deal is a win win. I'd only consider this if we lose Braylon or Santonio. I realize he runs his mouth at times but the guy is a baller. He brings it each and every Sunday.

12-21-2010, 01:18 PM	#2
Gibby Veteran Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 1,989	NO ****ING WAY!!!!!!!!!

12-21-2010, 01:19 PM	#3
Sourceworx Hall Of Fame Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Long Island Posts: 13,410	We still have Cotchery. Santonio/Cotch or Braylon/Cotch is still a solid duo. We can draft a young guy to use as our #3.

12-21-2010, 01:24 PM	#4
IRONFAN 40 All Pro Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Section 105 all day ,everyday Posts: 5,963	Rather draft a speedy slot receiver then go with that old geezer..

12-21-2010, 01:25 PM	#5
Sourceworx Hall Of Fame Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Long Island Posts: 13,410	[QUOTE=IRONFAN 40;3874965]Rather draft a speedy slot receiver then go with that old geezer..[/QUOTE] Agreed.

12-21-2010, 01:28 PM	#6
Johnny Rico Rookie Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 618	[QUOTE=IRONFAN 40;3874965]Rather draft a speedy slot receiver then go with that old geezer..[/QUOTE] +1 What Sanchez needs is someone who is [I]always[/I] open on third down. Hate to say this, but he needs someone like Welker. Someone he can rely on to know where the holes in the zone are, attack them and push the sticks.

12-21-2010, 01:29 PM	#7
jetsfan1983 All Pro Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 5,835	No TO please... Ocho I'd be fine with but I truly think that TO brings bad mojo to the lockerroom. Ocho goofs around but he's OK if they are winning. TO clowns around but he's not OK if he isn't getting his touches, even if the team is winning.

12-21-2010, 01:29 PM	#8
jetlifer hopes that John Idzik can clean up this mess Rookie Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 842	[COLOR="Red"][SIZE="7"]NO WAY[/SIZE][/COLOR]

12-21-2010, 01:30 PM	#9
JetPotato fermenting Hall Of Fame Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: New York, NY Posts: 12,115	Is the goal to be on Hard Knocks every season? Or to win?

12-21-2010, 01:35 PM	#10
Vin RE-SIGN ME, DAMMIT!!! All Pro Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 8,084	[QUOTE=JetPotato;3874976]Is the goal to be on Hard Knocks every season? Or to win?[/QUOTE] You have to wonder...had the Jets NOT been on Hard Knocks, you think they would be getting this much vitriol by everyone? Doubt it. Heck, I bet the Braylon DUI situation would've been swept under the rug like many of the other cases... Oh and Cotchery still has TWO YEARS left on his deal and it's about $4 Million dollars. If they cut him, the Jets only save about $450,000 dollars. So I think they have him restructure his contract which would help in re-signing both Tone and Bray-Bray.

12-21-2010, 01:44 PM	#11
Limolady Here On A "Need To Know" Basis. Jets Insider VIP Super*****/Prom Queen Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 16,397	Terrell is an "O" but my WR corps for 2011 is as follows: Jerricho, Santonio and [B]Plaxico[/B]. Don't forget this guy is due to be sprung from the Big House in April. I can also tell you that he will come out with a HUGE chip on his shoulder, he feels he was "made an example of", "did nothing wrong, but shoot himself" and will play like an NFL beast for any team willing to take a 2nd chance on him. The Jets blew the load with passing on Mike Vick and we're all witnesses to how that's working out. For the Eagles. Get Me Plaxico Cappy. Make It Happen. :yes:

12-21-2010, 01:53 PM	#12
Vin RE-SIGN ME, DAMMIT!!! All Pro Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 8,084	[QUOTE=Limolady;3874999]Terrell is an "O" but my WR corps for 2011 is as follows: Jerricho, Santonio and [B]Plaxico[/B]. Don't forget this guy is due to be sprung from the Big House in April. I can also tell you that he will come out with a HUGE chip on his shoulder, he feels he was "made an example of", "did nothing wrong, but shoot himself" and will play like an NFL beast for any team willing to take a 2nd chance on him. The Jets blew the load with passing on Mike Vick and we're all witnesses to how that's working out. For the Eagles. Get Me Plaxico Cappy. Make It Happen. :yes:[/QUOTE] Plaxico 34 next year Brayon 28. Sorry but give me the Younger WR who would grow with Sanchez and who WON'T Cause Trouble like Plaxico does.

12-21-2010, 02:06 PM	#13
Santonio stoked Veteran Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 1,120	[QUOTE=LockeJET;3874945]I'd be on board bringing in T.O. The Bengals have said they won't resign him. 72 catches for 983 yards and nine touchdowns after 14 games. [B]Call me crazy [/B]but I think at this point bringing him in on a 1 year incentive type deal is a win win. I'd only consider this if we lose Braylon or Santonio. I realize he runs his mouth at times but the guy is a baller. He brings it each and every Sunday.[/QUOTE] i'll oblige. You are crazy. Nuts as well.

12-21-2010, 02:09 PM	#14
Much ado about Nothing Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 1,602	Nope. Much rather draft someone or sign a young FA...

12-21-2010, 02:10 PM	#15
JetStream All League Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Floral Park, NY Posts: 2,930	[SIZE=6]Crazy[/SIZE]...there I did it...

12-21-2010, 02:16 PM	#16
frankiepapa hopes to bring back braylon and holmes All League Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 3,527	We are forgetting about Randy Moss!!

12-21-2010, 02:28 PM	#17
Vin RE-SIGN ME, DAMMIT!!! All Pro Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 8,084	[QUOTE=frankiepapa;3875067]We are forgetting about Randy Moss!![/QUOTE] Good. 'Cause it's better if he stays forgotten.

12-21-2010, 02:30 PM	#18
Gibby Veteran Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 1,989	[QUOTE=Vin;3875016]Plaxico 34 next year Brayon 28. Sorry but give me the Younger WR who would grow with Sanchez and who WON'T Cause Trouble like Plaxico does.[/QUOTE] Totally agree. I am one of the few around here who actually would keep Braylon over Holmes. To me he has more of an up side. Holmes is a small target. Edwards has improved by leaps and bounds from his 2009 "year of the drop".

12-21-2010, 02:36 PM	#19
I against I drinks from the poison well Veteran Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Jackson Heights Posts: 2,212	[QUOTE=LockeJET;3874945]I'd be on board bringing in T.O. The Bengals have said they won't resign him. 72 catches for 983 yards and nine touchdowns after 14 games. Call me crazy but I think at this point bringing him in on a 1 year incentive type deal is a win win. I'd only consider this if we lose Braylon or Santonio. I realize he runs his mouth at times but the guy is a baller. He brings it each and every Sunday.[/QUOTE] I was thinking the same thing last nite. Knowing you, you were probably smoking sorta the same thing I was. Happy Holidays!!

12-21-2010, 02:41 PM	#20
njherdfan Veteran Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Clark University, by way of West Orange, NJ Posts: 1,735	I have no doubts that TO will be a good player next year, but he would not do well with Sanchez. Sanchez has already shown he has a tendency to force passes to covered receivers, and I imagine that would only get worse if TO was constantly demanding the ball.