World War Three Matchups

Santonio · 10-06-2011, 04:38 PM

How about a special 8 man tag match?

China, Russia, Pakistan, Iran

vs

United States, Britain, India, Israel.

I guess most of Europe would automatically side with Britain and US. I think this is a disaster for the Chinese and friends. We'll assume Iran has a nuke or two for this fight but still.

WW111

Warfish · 10-06-2011, 04:54 PM

This was brought on by.....what, exactly?:confused:

Santonio · 10-06-2011, 05:18 PM

[QUOTE=Warfish;4178019]This was brought on by.....what, exactly?:confused:[/QUOTE]

am I being subjected to a blood and urine test? This is just a hypothetical matchup of some world powers and potential combatants. Who do you think survives this bloodbath?

chiefst2000 · 10-07-2011, 01:26 PM

[QUOTE=Santonio;4178044]am I being subjected to a blood and urine test? This is just a hypothetical matchup of some world powers and potential combatants. Who do you think survives this bloodbath?[/QUOTE]

No one survives. That conflict would end life as we know it. Thats why there has not been a world war since the advent of nukes.

bitonti · 10-07-2011, 01:55 PM

[QUOTE=chiefst2000;4178927] Thats why there has not been a world war since the advent of nukes.[/QUOTE]

also no WW since the UN, the IMF or the World Bank

China can't go to war with the USA. Who would buy all their crap?

Warfish · 10-07-2011, 02:45 PM

[QUOTE=Santonio;4178044]am I being subjected to a blood and urine test? This is just a hypothetical matchup of some world powers and potential combatants. Who do you think survives this bloodbath?[/QUOTE]

Not at all. I was just curious as to the genesis of this seemingly out-of-leftfield proposal.

If you would like an answer, given a millitary conflict of:

[QUOTE]China, Russia, Pakistan, Iran

vs

United States, Britain, India, Israel.[/QUOTE]

Even if such a conflict started as strictly conventional, it would quickly escalate into a nuclear conflict. At that tipping point, the Law of Mutually Assured Destruction kicks in, and should the first nuke fly, thats that for that.

Everyone loses. The survivors get to play "Fallout: The Home Version".

piney · 10-07-2011, 09:15 PM

[QUOTE=Warfish;4179072]Not at all. I was just curious as to the genesis of this seemingly out-of-leftfield proposal.

If you would like an answer, given a millitary conflict of:

Even if such a conflict started as strictly conventional, it would quickly escalate into a nuclear conflict. At that tipping point, the Law of Mutually Assured Destruction kicks in, and should the first nuke fly, thats that for that.

Everyone loses. The survivors get to play "Fallout: The Home Version".[/QUOTE]

let me check my old "Axis and Allies" game..give me 30 or so hours and I'll let you know.

Jetworks · 10-07-2011, 09:33 PM

[QUOTE=Warfish;4179072]Not at all. I was just curious as to the genesis of this seemingly out-of-leftfield proposal.

If you would like an answer, given a millitary conflict of:

Even if such a conflict started as strictly conventional, it would quickly escalate into a nuclear conflict. At that tipping point, the Law of Mutually Assured Destruction kicks in, and should the first nuke fly, thats that for that.

Everyone loses. [B]The survivors get to play "Fallout: The Home Version".[/B][/QUOTE]

And I will meet you in New Vegas, my friend.

I look forward to donning some post-apocalyptic gear and souping up an old Pontiac.

Maybe a Trans Am.

Possibly.

Warfish · 10-07-2011, 09:55 PM

[QUOTE=piney;4179522]let me check my old "Axis and Allies" game..give me 30 or so hours and I'll let you know.[/QUOTE]

I LOVED that board game when I was a kid.

BushyTheBeaver · 10-07-2011, 11:47 PM

[QUOTE=Santonio;4178007]How about a special 8 man tag match?

China, Russia, Pakistan, Iran

vs

United States, Britain, India, Israel.

I guess most of Europe would automatically side with Britain and US. I think this is a disaster for the Chinese and friends. We'll assume Iran has a nuke or two for this fight but still.

WW111[/QUOTE]

How about US/Canada vs Mexico and all of Central and South America?

10-06-2011, 04:38 PM	#1
Santonio stoked Veteran Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 1,120	World War Three Matchups How about a special 8 man tag match? China, Russia, Pakistan, Iran vs United States, Britain, India, Israel. I guess most of Europe would automatically side with Britain and US. I think this is a disaster for the Chinese and friends. We'll assume Iran has a nuke or two for this fight but still. WW111

10-06-2011, 04:54 PM	#2
Warfish JetsInsider.com Legend Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 35,000	This was brought on by.....what, exactly?:confused:

10-06-2011, 05:18 PM	#3
Santonio stoked Veteran Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 1,120	[QUOTE=Warfish;4178019]This was brought on by.....what, exactly?:confused:[/QUOTE] am I being subjected to a blood and urine test? This is just a hypothetical matchup of some world powers and potential combatants. Who do you think survives this bloodbath?

10-07-2011, 01:26 PM	#4
chiefst2000 Champion of Common Sense All Pro Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,829	[QUOTE=Santonio;4178044]am I being subjected to a blood and urine test? This is just a hypothetical matchup of some world powers and potential combatants. Who do you think survives this bloodbath?[/QUOTE] No one survives. That conflict would end life as we know it. Thats why there has not been a world war since the advent of nukes.

10-07-2011, 01:55 PM	#5
bitonti searching Hall Of Fame Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Philly Posts: 38,786	[QUOTE=chiefst2000;4178927] Thats why there has not been a world war since the advent of nukes.[/QUOTE] also no WW since the UN, the IMF or the World Bank China can't go to war with the USA. Who would buy all their crap?

10-07-2011, 02:45 PM	#6
Warfish JetsInsider.com Legend Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 35,000	[QUOTE=Santonio;4178044]am I being subjected to a blood and urine test? This is just a hypothetical matchup of some world powers and potential combatants. Who do you think survives this bloodbath?[/QUOTE] Not at all. I was just curious as to the genesis of this seemingly out-of-leftfield proposal. If you would like an answer, given a millitary conflict of: [QUOTE]China, Russia, Pakistan, Iran vs United States, Britain, India, Israel.[/QUOTE] Even if such a conflict started as strictly conventional, it would quickly escalate into a nuclear conflict. At that tipping point, the Law of Mutually Assured Destruction kicks in, and should the first nuke fly, thats that for that. Everyone loses. The survivors get to play "Fallout: The Home Version".

10-07-2011, 09:15 PM	#7
piney hip deep in dirty diapers All League Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 3,618	[QUOTE=Warfish;4179072]Not at all. I was just curious as to the genesis of this seemingly out-of-leftfield proposal. If you would like an answer, given a millitary conflict of: Even if such a conflict started as strictly conventional, it would quickly escalate into a nuclear conflict. At that tipping point, the Law of Mutually Assured Destruction kicks in, and should the first nuke fly, thats that for that. Everyone loses. The survivors get to play "Fallout: The Home Version".[/QUOTE] let me check my old "Axis and Allies" game..give me 30 or so hours and I'll let you know.

10-07-2011, 09:33 PM	#8
Jetworks murse in training Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Staten Island Posts: 7,452	[QUOTE=Warfish;4179072]Not at all. I was just curious as to the genesis of this seemingly out-of-leftfield proposal. If you would like an answer, given a millitary conflict of: Even if such a conflict started as strictly conventional, it would quickly escalate into a nuclear conflict. At that tipping point, the Law of Mutually Assured Destruction kicks in, and should the first nuke fly, thats that for that. Everyone loses. [B]The survivors get to play "Fallout: The Home Version".[/B][/QUOTE] And I will meet you in New Vegas, my friend. I look forward to donning some post-apocalyptic gear and souping up an old Pontiac. Maybe a Trans Am. Possibly.

10-07-2011, 09:55 PM	#9
Warfish JetsInsider.com Legend Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 35,000	[QUOTE=piney;4179522]let me check my old "Axis and Allies" game..give me 30 or so hours and I'll let you know.[/QUOTE] I LOVED that board game when I was a kid.

10-07-2011, 11:47 PM	#10
BushyTheBeaver size matters All League Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3,922	[QUOTE=Santonio;4178007]How about a special 8 man tag match? China, Russia, Pakistan, Iran vs United States, Britain, India, Israel. I guess most of Europe would automatically side with Britain and US. I think this is a disaster for the Chinese and friends. We'll assume Iran has a nuke or two for this fight but still. WW111[/QUOTE] How about US/Canada vs Mexico and all of Central and South America?