"All 22 Game Tape"...would you pay

jetsfanri · 11-30-2011, 10:30 PM

If the NFL offered a service online that gave you the opportunity to watch the Jets (or any other team) coaches tape that showed the whole field on every play, what would you pay to access it?

Chupa · 11-30-2011, 11:06 PM

it's the year 2011. We should be able to choose from several main camera angles (the producer would still switch to replay angles) during live games.

AlwaysGreenAlwaysWhite · 11-30-2011, 11:39 PM

I'd watch but imagine it is a small market that would.

Small monthly payment or yearly deal would suffice.

Cornfed · 11-30-2011, 11:58 PM

I guess I should be voting for the max I'd pay for something like this, but instead I thought of it as 50 bones for a season of video? Sure. And if it's made trivially accessible...like on demand on the web and via mobile devices whenever I want....then I'd probably pay a little more.

But my points are, yes, I'd pay for something like this and, like most other content, I want it on demand and easily accessible via the devices I use.

FreshBaked 24 7 · 12-01-2011, 12:27 AM

Oh ****. The Schotty Sanchez *****ing on this site would be unbearable if this where available

10PennyToColes87 · 12-01-2011, 12:57 AM

Depends on how much it would cost.

rextilleon · 12-01-2011, 01:47 AM

As someone who likes to bet games, I would definately love to be able to break down teams using that technology.

jetgreen13 · 12-01-2011, 01:54 AM

if it fit my budget, no question..

jetsfanri · 12-01-2011, 09:28 AM

Go look at Dilfers tweets and you know how cool it would be to see what he sees.

Austin · 12-01-2011, 09:36 AM

I think it would be a fun novelty to do it for a game here or there, but I don't think I have enough free time to justify doing it over the course of a season.

My.Favorite.Martin · 12-01-2011, 09:37 AM

I would love to have access to this.

KRL · 12-01-2011, 09:58 AM

I would pay for it. But I doubt the NFL will ever do it, it would put coaches
and players under a bigger microscope

littleeddiebell · 12-01-2011, 11:06 AM

I would pay $100 per year.

nyahay bus · 12-01-2011, 11:15 AM

I want it but why should I have to pay for it at all? NBC makes different camera angles available for free on its website, so what is so special about this camera angle that it carries a fee?

jetsfanri · 12-01-2011, 04:47 PM

[QUOTE=nyahay bus;4259019]I want it but why should I have to pay for it at all? NBC makes different camera angles available for free on its website, so what is so special about this camera angle that it carries a fee?[/QUOTE]

It's content that's not produced by the networks...it's produced by the NFL. Also, it already exists and is unavailable, so the issue of why we pay is to entice the NFL to make it available.

Dirtstar · 12-01-2011, 04:50 PM

i'd pay an extra $15 bucks for this on my Sunday Ticket.

Rexipus Rex · 12-01-2011, 09:49 PM

[QUOTE=KRL;4258922]I would pay for it. But I doubt the NFL will ever do it, it would put coaches
and players under a bigger microscope[/QUOTE]

That's exactly what Charley Casserly said. It's unfortunate.

Even if we don't get the All-22, I still think that the cameras should gradually zoom out a little bit once it is obvious that it is a passing play. I hate seeing the receivers "disappear" on my screen. Even if we can't see everyone at once, I'd at least like to get an idea how our CBs or WRs are doing.

As for the original post, I would definitely pay money to get access to the All 22.

Peebag · 12-01-2011, 11:27 PM

My name is Bill Belichick and I approve of this thread!

xxaaaxx · 12-02-2011, 02:27 AM

I'm still a little fuzzy as to why this isn't available now? Does the NFL specifically tell the networks they can't use wide/high camera angles to show all 22 players? As it is, they show enough angles on important plays to put together a pretty good mental composite of the entire play.

How would players/coaches be under a bigger microscope? They get roasted during games and in the media NOW, often (if the narrative is to be believed) based on angles that are only telling part of the story. Maybe I'm naive but I'd think they would want MORE info out there.

nyahay bus · 12-02-2011, 09:28 AM

A few years ago you would see the occasional all 22 replay from a camera at the top of the stadium. Now it has disappeared from the broadcasts. Avoiding criticism is a lame excuse for keeping it from the public.

View Poll Results: What would you pay for the "all 22" coaches tape online?
$49 a season	21	36.21%
$79 a season	6	10.34%
$99 a season	15	25.86%
Not interested	16	27.59%
Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll

11-30-2011, 10:30 PM	#1
jetsfanri Practice Squad Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 374	"All 22 Game Tape"...would you pay If the NFL offered a service online that gave you the opportunity to watch the Jets (or any other team) coaches tape that showed the whole field on every play, what would you pay to access it?

11-30-2011, 11:06 PM	#2
Chupa All League Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 3,279	it's the year 2011. We should be able to choose from several main camera angles (the producer would still switch to replay angles) during live games.

11-30-2011, 11:39 PM	#3
AlwaysGreenAlwaysWhite is all out of fuCks to give... All Pro Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 7,452	I'd watch but imagine it is a small market that would. Small monthly payment or yearly deal would suffice.

11-30-2011, 11:58 PM	#4
Cornfed Veteran Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,367	I guess I should be voting for the max I'd pay for something like this, but instead I thought of it as 50 bones for a season of video? Sure. And if it's made trivially accessible...like on demand on the web and via mobile devices whenever I want....then I'd probably pay a little more. But my points are, yes, I'd pay for something like this and, like most other content, I want it on demand and easily accessible via the devices I use.

12-01-2011, 12:27 AM	#5
FreshBaked 24 7 wait...wha? 0_o All League Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Midland Park, NJ Posts: 3,697	Oh **. The Schotty Sanchez ***ing on this site would be unbearable if this where available

12-01-2011, 12:57 AM	#6
10PennyToColes87 Hall Of Fame Join Date: May 2005 Location: SoFla Posts: 15,377	Depends on how much it would cost.

12-01-2011, 01:47 AM	#7
rextilleon Is Itzdik the Man? All League Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 4,650	As someone who likes to bet games, I would definately love to be able to break down teams using that technology.

12-01-2011, 01:54 AM	#8
jetgreen13 Hall Of Fame Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: transplanted new yorker in maryland Posts: 4,438	if it fit my budget, no question..

12-01-2011, 09:28 AM	#9
jetsfanri Practice Squad Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 374	Go look at Dilfers tweets and you know how cool it would be to see what he sees.

12-01-2011, 09:36 AM	#10
Austin WINNING All Pro Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Upper East Side Posts: 6,187	I think it would be a fun novelty to do it for a game here or there, but I don't think I have enough free time to justify doing it over the course of a season.

12-01-2011, 09:37 AM	#11
My.Favorite.Martin Banned Banned Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 2,817	I would love to have access to this.

12-01-2011, 09:58 AM	#12
KRL Veteran Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Brooklyn, NY Posts: 1,720	I would pay for it. But I doubt the NFL will ever do it, it would put coaches and players under a bigger microscope

12-01-2011, 11:06 AM	#13
littleeddiebell Undrafted Free Agent Join Date: May 2007 Location: South Florida Posts: 155	I would pay $100 per year.

12-01-2011, 11:15 AM	#14
nyahay bus said it before: a dearth of playoff appearances in the next few years. Veteran Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,365	I want it but why should I have to pay for it at all? NBC makes different camera angles available for free on its website, so what is so special about this camera angle that it carries a fee?

12-01-2011, 04:47 PM	#15
jetsfanri Practice Squad Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 374	[QUOTE=nyahay bus;4259019]I want it but why should I have to pay for it at all? NBC makes different camera angles available for free on its website, so what is so special about this camera angle that it carries a fee?[/QUOTE] It's content that's not produced by the networks...it's produced by the NFL. Also, it already exists and is unavailable, so the issue of why we pay is to entice the NFL to make it available.

12-01-2011, 04:50 PM	#16
Dirtstar Snubbed a man just to watch him cry. Hall Of Fame Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 15,790	i'd pay an extra $15 bucks for this on my Sunday Ticket.

12-01-2011, 09:49 PM	#17
Rexipus Rex Mo' money Veteran Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: E'Ville Posts: 1,200	[QUOTE=KRL;4258922]I would pay for it. But I doubt the NFL will ever do it, it would put coaches and players under a bigger microscope[/QUOTE] That's exactly what Charley Casserly said. It's unfortunate. Even if we don't get the All-22, I still think that the cameras should gradually zoom out a little bit once it is obvious that it is a passing play. I hate seeing the receivers "disappear" on my screen. Even if we can't see everyone at once, I'd at least like to get an idea how our CBs or WRs are doing. As for the original post, I would definitely pay money to get access to the All 22.

12-01-2011, 11:27 PM	#18
Peebag being disappointed since January 13th, 1969 All Pro Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: great midwest -well not so great Posts: 7,113	My name is Bill Belichick and I approve of this thread!

12-02-2011, 02:27 AM	#19
xxaaaxx ...whatever. Rookie Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 984	I'm still a little fuzzy as to why this isn't available now? Does the NFL specifically tell the networks they can't use wide/high camera angles to show all 22 players? As it is, they show enough angles on important plays to put together a pretty good mental composite of the entire play. How would players/coaches be under a bigger microscope? They get roasted during games and in the media NOW, often (if the narrative is to be believed) based on angles that are only telling part of the story. Maybe I'm naive but I'd think they would want MORE info out there.

12-02-2011, 09:28 AM	#20
nyahay bus said it before: a dearth of playoff appearances in the next few years. Veteran Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,365	A few years ago you would see the occasional all 22 replay from a camera at the top of the stadium. Now it has disappeared from the broadcasts. Avoiding criticism is a lame excuse for keeping it from the public.