Pro Football Focus stats on Slauson

section314 · 03-09-2012, 09:05 AM

Does anybody have access to the 2011 stats on Slauson? Would be interested to see them.

herecomedajets · 03-09-2012, 09:32 AM

Of the 58 eligible guards that played 50% or more of the offensive snaps, he graded at 34.

He graded better at pass blocking than run blocking. His best grade was penalities.

Overal score was -3.2, -.9 in pass blocking, -4.4 in run blocking, and 2.1 in penalties.

He was credited with 4 qb sacks, 7 hits, and 13 pressures.

They also offer a Pass Blocking Efficiency stat where he ranks 27th out of 55 eligible guards.

Anyway you look at it, he was middle of the pack. Moore was ranked 7th in the leage in pass blocking efficiency for guards btw.

lamont_jordan_rules · 03-09-2012, 09:37 AM

[QUOTE=herecomedajets;4389559]Of the 58 eligible guards that played 50% or more of the offensive snaps, he graded at 34.

He graded better at pass blocking than run blocking. His best grade was penalities.

Overal score was -3.2, -.9 in pass blocking, -4.4 in run blocking, and 2.1 in penalties.

He was credited with 4 qb sacks, 7 hits, and 13 pressures.

They also offer a Pass Blocking Efficiency stat where he ranks 27th out of 55 eligible guards.

Anyway you look at it, he was middle of the pack. Moore was ranked 7th in the leage in pass blocking efficiency for guards btw.[/QUOTE]

... good info thx ...

(Edit - apologies, was discussing RT instead of LG there by mistake ... am happy with slauson's progress)

l_j_r

DDNYjets · 03-09-2012, 09:38 AM

I have been very pleased with his development. I think he is only going to get better. You can see the improvement from game-to-game and month-to-month. So, IMO he passed the eye-test.

In 2010 he was neck and neck with Vlad. I think he will top out around the Top 15, which is more than enough when you consider he is playing between Mangold and Brick. He will never be a young Faneca, but he does not need to be with those guys surrounding him.

All the knocks I gave Cally and Tanny I have to give them a little credit on this one.

ozu · 03-09-2012, 09:39 AM

He graded out as league average in pretty much every way. He's not really a net negative to the line like Hunter was.

AlwaysGreenAlwaysWhite · 03-09-2012, 09:43 AM

An average guard between Brick and Mangold is acceptable...

A RT who gives free releases is a disaster... That's our downfall on the line. Shore that up and the unit should play with far more pride and look better overall...

DDNYjets · 03-09-2012, 09:45 AM

[QUOTE=AlwaysGreenAlwaysWhite;4389573]An average guard between Brick and Mangold is acceptable...

A RT who gives free releases is a disaster... That's our downfall on the line. Shore that up and the unit should play with far more pride and look better overall...[/QUOTE]

Exactly. Jets can more than live with Slauson. He has been a pleasant surprise.

Hunter is unforgivable.

Jet Life · 03-09-2012, 10:02 AM

Don't forget Slauson also played this season with a torn rotator cuff, a torn labrum and a torn biceps..he's tough and will only get better. Great value for a 6th round pick

jetsfan1983 · 03-09-2012, 10:22 AM

Throw in the fact that they are paying Slauson peanuts and it makes him that much more valuable. Not only comes down to how good someone is in a salary cap world, but how much they are getting paid as well. His value is tremendous to the team right now. Solid play out of someone who gets paid nothing.

section314 · 03-09-2012, 10:31 AM

[QUOTE=herecomedajets;4389559]Of the 58 eligible guards that played 50% or more of the offensive snaps, he graded at 34.

He graded better at pass blocking than run blocking. His best grade was penalities.

Overal score was -3.2, -.9 in pass blocking, -4.4 in run blocking, and 2.1 in penalties.

He was credited with 4 qb sacks, 7 hits, and 13 pressures.

They also offer a Pass Blocking Efficiency stat where he ranks 27th out of 55 eligible guards.

Anyway you look at it, he was middle of the pack. Moore was ranked 7th in the leage in pass blocking efficiency for guards btw.[/QUOTE]

Thanks much. Definitely a tremendous 6th rounder. The reason I asked is I remember reading a post, I believe from Bitonti, that mentioned the Jets thought of Slauson as a potential RT. Now, that might have been all Callahan, but if it still holds true, maybe a DeCastro or Konz might not seem so crazy?

Sourceworx · 03-09-2012, 10:46 AM

[QUOTE=section314;4389641]Thanks much. Definitely a tremendous 6th rounder. The reason I asked is I remember reading a post, I believe from Bitonti, that mentioned the Jets thought of Slauson as a potential RT. Now, that might have been all Callahan, but if it still holds true, maybe a DeCastro or Konz might not seem so crazy?[/QUOTE]

I would worry about his ability to block faster DEs on the outside.

That said he has the size for it. He looked like he grew a bit last year.

[IMG]http://ww2.hdnux.com/photos/06/56/61/1764425/21/628x471.jpg[/IMG]

JetFreak89 · 03-09-2012, 11:29 AM

Performing "middle of the pack" is perfectly acceptable for Slauson. He is still young (should keep improving, unlike Hunter), is cheap and was severely injured last year. Hopefully he gets healthy and keeps improving.

Jordy · 03-09-2012, 05:39 PM

[QUOTE=DDNYjets;4389563]I have been very pleased with his development. I think he is only going to get better. You can see the improvement from game-to-game and month-to-month. So, IMO he passed the eye-test.

In 2010 he was neck and neck with Vlad. I think he will top out around the Top 15, which is more than enough when you consider he is playing between Mangold and Brick. He will never be a young Faneca, but he does not need to be with those guys surrounding him.

All the knocks I gave Cally and Tanny I have to give them a little credit on this one.[/QUOTE]
Didn't Callahan have him at Nebraska?

DDNYjets · 03-09-2012, 06:09 PM

[QUOTE=Jordy;4390316]Didn't Callahan have him at Nebraska?[/QUOTE]

Yeah. Looks like the Jets had some insider info on him. Still great value.

Kentucky Jet · 03-09-2012, 06:19 PM

[QUOTE=DDNYjets;4389563]I have been very pleased with his development. I think he is only going to get better. You can see the improvement from game-to-game and month-to-month. So, IMO he passed the eye-test.

In 2010 he was neck and neck with Vlad. I think he will top out around the Top 15, which is more than enough when you consider he is playing between Mangold and Brick. He will never be a young Faneca, but he does not need to be with those guys surrounding him.

All the knocks I gave Cally and Tanny I have to give them a little credit on this one.[/QUOTE]

Agreed. Plus Slauson seems to be very well respected in the clubhouse. Many times he answers reporters questions rather then other team leaders like Brick & Nick.

Kentucky Jet · 03-09-2012, 06:20 PM

[QUOTE=AlwaysGreenAlwaysWhite;4389573]An average guard between Brick and Mangold is acceptable...

A RT who gives free releases is a disaster... That's our downfall on the line. Shore that up and the unit should play with far more pride and look better overall...[/QUOTE]

and yet BRICK allowed more sacks then Hunter and you seem to ignore that fact.

patsfanken · 03-09-2012, 06:31 PM

Just a disclaimer about all stats derived from Pro Football Focus. Its a site run by a football geek out of England of all places. He has managed to get many volunteers (mostly European NFL fans) who grade every player and every game. That's the good news.

The bad news is the people making judgments of a player's success or failure on each play is just another fan like you or I who may or may NOT really understand the game. He is completely unaware of the actual assignment that play may have had, AND he get all his info off the Network feed, not the coaches tape.

So because they are amateurs, have no idea what the actual assignments were, and can't see all the field, what you get for stats are merely one fan's guesses at what actually happened.

Slauson's ACTUAL play could very well be better than what PFF said.....or worse. I get pissed when they are quoted by some mediot to prove one thing or another, because of this unreliable methodology. Without the coaches tapes and knowledge of the actual assignments its all just guess work. I admire their ambition. I hate their inaccuracies.

03-09-2012, 09:05 AM	#1
section314 ABA hoops expert Veteran Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,027	Pro Football Focus stats on Slauson Does anybody have access to the 2011 stats on Slauson? Would be interested to see them.

03-09-2012, 09:37 AM	#3
lamont_jordan_rules Can't Wait To See Marty Mornhinweg's Offense! Hall of Fame Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Location: Atlanta via NJ Posts: 6,309	[QUOTE=herecomedajets;4389559]Of the 58 eligible guards that played 50% or more of the offensive snaps, he graded at 34. He graded better at pass blocking than run blocking. His best grade was penalities. Overal score was -3.2, -.9 in pass blocking, -4.4 in run blocking, and 2.1 in penalties. He was credited with 4 qb sacks, 7 hits, and 13 pressures. They also offer a Pass Blocking Efficiency stat where he ranks 27th out of 55 eligible guards. Anyway you look at it, he was middle of the pack. Moore was ranked 7th in the leage in pass blocking efficiency for guards btw.[/QUOTE] ... good info thx ... (Edit - apologies, was discussing RT instead of LG there by mistake ... am happy with slauson's progress) l_j_r Last edited by lamont_jordan_rules; 03-09-2012 at 10:31 AM.

03-09-2012, 09:32 AM	#2
herecomedajets Undrafted Free Agent Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 10	Of the 58 eligible guards that played 50% or more of the offensive snaps, he graded at 34. He graded better at pass blocking than run blocking. His best grade was penalities. Overal score was -3.2, -.9 in pass blocking, -4.4 in run blocking, and 2.1 in penalties. He was credited with 4 qb sacks, 7 hits, and 13 pressures. They also offer a Pass Blocking Efficiency stat where he ranks 27th out of 55 eligible guards. Anyway you look at it, he was middle of the pack. Moore was ranked 7th in the leage in pass blocking efficiency for guards btw.

03-09-2012, 09:38 AM	#4
DDNYjets Hall Of Fame Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: New York Posts: 12,573	I have been very pleased with his development. I think he is only going to get better. You can see the improvement from game-to-game and month-to-month. So, IMO he passed the eye-test. In 2010 he was neck and neck with Vlad. I think he will top out around the Top 15, which is more than enough when you consider he is playing between Mangold and Brick. He will never be a young Faneca, but he does not need to be with those guys surrounding him. All the knocks I gave Cally and Tanny I have to give them a little credit on this one.

03-09-2012, 09:39 AM	#5
ozu in Section 135, Row 28. All League Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Hoboken Posts: 3,922	He graded out as league average in pretty much every way. He's not really a net negative to the line like Hunter was.

03-09-2012, 09:43 AM	#6
AlwaysGreenAlwaysWhite is all out of fuCks to give... All Pro Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 7,487	An average guard between Brick and Mangold is acceptable... A RT who gives free releases is a disaster... That's our downfall on the line. Shore that up and the unit should play with far more pride and look better overall...

03-09-2012, 09:45 AM	#7
DDNYjets Hall Of Fame Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: New York Posts: 12,573	[QUOTE=AlwaysGreenAlwaysWhite;4389573]An average guard between Brick and Mangold is acceptable... A RT who gives free releases is a disaster... That's our downfall on the line. Shore that up and the unit should play with far more pride and look better overall...[/QUOTE] Exactly. Jets can more than live with Slauson. He has been a pleasant surprise. Hunter is unforgivable.

03-09-2012, 10:02 AM	#8
Jet Life Veteran Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: CT Posts: 1,842	Don't forget Slauson also played this season with a torn rotator cuff, a torn labrum and a torn biceps..he's tough and will only get better. Great value for a 6th round pick

03-09-2012, 10:22 AM	#9
jetsfan1983 All Pro Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 5,837	Throw in the fact that they are paying Slauson peanuts and it makes him that much more valuable. Not only comes down to how good someone is in a salary cap world, but how much they are getting paid as well. His value is tremendous to the team right now. Solid play out of someone who gets paid nothing.

03-09-2012, 10:31 AM	#10
section314 ABA hoops expert Veteran Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,027	[QUOTE=herecomedajets;4389559]Of the 58 eligible guards that played 50% or more of the offensive snaps, he graded at 34. He graded better at pass blocking than run blocking. His best grade was penalities. Overal score was -3.2, -.9 in pass blocking, -4.4 in run blocking, and 2.1 in penalties. He was credited with 4 qb sacks, 7 hits, and 13 pressures. They also offer a Pass Blocking Efficiency stat where he ranks 27th out of 55 eligible guards. Anyway you look at it, he was middle of the pack. Moore was ranked 7th in the leage in pass blocking efficiency for guards btw.[/QUOTE] Thanks much. Definitely a tremendous 6th rounder. The reason I asked is I remember reading a post, I believe from Bitonti, that mentioned the Jets thought of Slauson as a potential RT. Now, that might have been all Callahan, but if it still holds true, maybe a DeCastro or Konz might not seem so crazy?

03-09-2012, 10:46 AM	#11
Sourceworx Hall Of Fame Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Long Island Posts: 13,461	[QUOTE=section314;4389641]Thanks much. Definitely a tremendous 6th rounder. The reason I asked is I remember reading a post, I believe from Bitonti, that mentioned the Jets thought of Slauson as a potential RT. Now, that might have been all Callahan, but if it still holds true, maybe a DeCastro or Konz might not seem so crazy?[/QUOTE] I would worry about his ability to block faster DEs on the outside. That said he has the size for it. He looked like he grew a bit last year. [IMG]http://ww2.hdnux.com/photos/06/56/61/1764425/21/628x471.jpg[/IMG]

03-09-2012, 11:29 AM	#12
JetFreak89 All League Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: New Jersey Posts: 3,343	Performing "middle of the pack" is perfectly acceptable for Slauson. He is still young (should keep improving, unlike Hunter), is cheap and was severely injured last year. Hopefully he gets healthy and keeps improving.

03-09-2012, 05:39 PM	#13
Jordy Keeping it real... Banned Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Tårnby, Denmark Posts: 23,145	[QUOTE=DDNYjets;4389563]I have been very pleased with his development. I think he is only going to get better. You can see the improvement from game-to-game and month-to-month. So, IMO he passed the eye-test. In 2010 he was neck and neck with Vlad. I think he will top out around the Top 15, which is more than enough when you consider he is playing between Mangold and Brick. He will never be a young Faneca, but he does not need to be with those guys surrounding him. All the knocks I gave Cally and Tanny I have to give them a little credit on this one.[/QUOTE] Didn't Callahan have him at Nebraska?

03-09-2012, 06:09 PM	#14
DDNYjets Hall Of Fame Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: New York Posts: 12,573	[QUOTE=Jordy;4390316]Didn't Callahan have him at Nebraska?[/QUOTE] Yeah. Looks like the Jets had some insider info on him. Still great value.

03-09-2012, 06:19 PM	#15
Kentucky Jet A NY JETS fan! Go Jets! Hall Of Fame Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Ormond Beach, Florida Posts: 10,964	[QUOTE=DDNYjets;4389563]I have been very pleased with his development. I think he is only going to get better. You can see the improvement from game-to-game and month-to-month. So, IMO he passed the eye-test. In 2010 he was neck and neck with Vlad. I think he will top out around the Top 15, which is more than enough when you consider he is playing between Mangold and Brick. He will never be a young Faneca, but he does not need to be with those guys surrounding him. All the knocks I gave Cally and Tanny I have to give them a little credit on this one.[/QUOTE] Agreed. Plus Slauson seems to be very well respected in the clubhouse. Many times he answers reporters questions rather then other team leaders like Brick & Nick.

03-09-2012, 06:20 PM	#16
Kentucky Jet A NY JETS fan! Go Jets! Hall Of Fame Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Ormond Beach, Florida Posts: 10,964	[QUOTE=AlwaysGreenAlwaysWhite;4389573]An average guard between Brick and Mangold is acceptable... A RT who gives free releases is a disaster... That's our downfall on the line. Shore that up and the unit should play with far more pride and look better overall...[/QUOTE] and yet BRICK allowed more sacks then Hunter and you seem to ignore that fact.

03-09-2012, 06:31 PM	#17
patsfanken Banned Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: N.Attleboro, MA Posts: 3,725	Just a disclaimer about all stats derived from Pro Football Focus. Its a site run by a football geek out of England of all places. He has managed to get many volunteers (mostly European NFL fans) who grade every player and every game. That's the good news. The bad news is the people making judgments of a player's success or failure on each play is just another fan like you or I who may or may NOT really understand the game. He is completely unaware of the actual assignment that play may have had, AND he get all his info off the Network feed, not the coaches tape. So because they are amateurs, have no idea what the actual assignments were, and can't see all the field, what you get for stats are merely one fan's guesses at what actually happened. Slauson's ACTUAL play could very well be better than what PFF said.....or worse. I get pissed when they are quoted by some mediot to prove one thing or another, because of this unreliable methodology. Without the coaches tapes and knowledge of the actual assignments its all just guess work. I admire their ambition. I hate their inaccuracies.