Major Scandal Unfolding - Leaks from the White House Threaten National Security - Page 2

PlumberKhan · 06-10-2012, 03:17 PM

[QUOTE=sackdance;4488363]Obama escalated Afghanistan....[/QUOTE]

Why?

Because that's where Al Queada actually was.

Not in Iraq.

LOLZ.....

Jungle Shift Jet · 06-10-2012, 09:32 PM

[QUOTE=PlumberKhan;4488354]Obama pisses these tools off.

Why?

Because he has managed to get better results using less $$$ and spilling less American blood.

Obama proved that you don't need a large scale occupation to achieve results. But the Kenyan wasn't supposed to do that.

Remember? Obama was going to welcome Al Queda into the White House for tea and crumpets...not actually kill them at a higher rate than Captain Brush Clearer.

Republicans have as much strategic intelligence as my dog trying to catch a squirrel. They're not good at it and they look f*cking retarded trying to do it....[/QUOTE]

Hey Rainbow Connection talk about strategic intelligence you don't get any when you don't waterboard and you certainly don't get any when you summmarily excecute a whole bunch of bad guys (by itself, a good thing) without capturing any (a bad thing)

Between the drones and choppers giftwrapped to Iran and Pakistan (places Al Qaeda "wasn't" either) and moles/double agents compromised by the MSM/WH you tell me if B. Hussein is a f*cking retard or not.

Warfish · 06-10-2012, 11:00 PM

[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488289]Did Obama lie to start to a war?[/quote]

More talking points.

When an (R) wages war based on faulty intel, it's a massive right wing conspiracy for Oil.

When a (D) wages a war based on European Oil Interests, it's REALLY to stop a potential massacre.....pay no mind to the Syria across the way.:rolleyes:

A walking talking point these days, some rather mouldy old ones at that.:zzz:

SafetyBlitz · 06-10-2012, 11:19 PM

[QUOTE=Warfish;4488514]More talking points.

When an (R) wages war based on faulty intel, it's a massive right wing conspiracy for Oil.

When a (D) wages a war based on European Oil Interests, it's REALLY to stop a potential massacre.....pay no mind to the Syria across the way.:rolleyes:

A walking talking point these days, some rather mouldy old ones at that.:zzz:[/QUOTE]

Keep comparing Libya to Iraq, lets see where this goes.

Did we invade Libya? How long did we occupy Libya? How much did the Libya operation cost? How many American service personnel died in Libya?

shakin318 · 06-10-2012, 11:29 PM

[QUOTE=PlumberKhan;4488354]Obama pisses these tools off.

Why?

Because he has managed to get better results using less $$$ and spilling less American blood.

[/QUOTE]

Using intel gleaned by the methods of the previous administration...methods wailed and wept about by the pussified hippified lefties until the golden sh:tbag himself was in office....now it's all good. This f-cking skell and his skank wife can't evacuate the White House fast enough

SafetyBlitz · 06-10-2012, 11:30 PM

[QUOTE=shakin318;4488526]Using intel gleaned by the methods of the previous administration...methods wailed and wept about by the pussified hippified lefties until the golden sh:tbag himself was in office....now it's all good. This f-cking skell and his skank wife can't evacuate the White House fast enough[/QUOTE]

Bush used that same intel and decided to invade Iraq.

Game. Set. Match.

shakin318 · 06-10-2012, 11:39 PM

[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488528]Bush used that same intel and decided to invade Iraq.

Game. Set. Match.[/QUOTE]

Really? He used the intel secured by waterboarding Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his scumbag ilk to invade Iraq? You may want to take a remedial course in calendar reading. You can fit it in right between your WaPo Talking Points 101 and Women's Study courses, college boy.

SafetyBlitz · 06-11-2012, 12:09 AM

[QUOTE=shakin318;4488535]Really? He used the intel secured by waterboarding Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his scumbag ilk to invade Iraq? You may want to take a remedial course in calendar reading. You can fit it in right between your WaPo Talking Points 101 and Women's Study courses, college boy.[/QUOTE]

KSM was captured in Iraq, I thought Pakistan?

What good came out of invading Iraq regarding the War on Terror?

Furthermore, who would've acted on that intel you say was all Bush and his policies - [B]all Republican candidates criticized Obama for saying he'd go into Pakistan to get Bin Laden during the 08 election.[/B]

Then he ordered the mission, amongst stiff objections from his own cabinet and the military, and here we are with Bin Laden dead.

Bush's anti-terror policy stopped being credible the second we invaded Iraq. What the F does Iraq have to do with 9/11. Get back to me on that, in the meantime, I'll continue to be the college boy - Law School boy this fall.

Bonhomme Richard · 06-11-2012, 12:18 AM

[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488545]KSM was captured in Iraq, I thought Pakistan?

What good came out of invading Iraq regarding the War on Terror?

Furthermore, who would've acted on that intel you say was all Bush and his policies - [B]all Republican candidates criticized Obama for saying he'd go into Pakistan to get Bin Laden during the 08 election.[/B]
[/QUOTE]

Hmm... honestly, I don't remember that.

SafetyBlitz · 06-11-2012, 12:20 AM

[QUOTE=Bonhomme Richard;4488548]Hmm... honestly, I don't remember that.[/QUOTE]

Romney, McCain and Hillary.

Ron Paul too if you consider him a real candidate.

shakin318 · 06-11-2012, 12:28 AM

[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488545]KSM was captured in Iraq, I thought Pakistan?

What good came out of invading Iraq regarding the War on Terror?

Furthermore, who would've acted on that intel you say was all Bush and his policies - [B]all Republican candidates criticized Obama for saying he'd go into Pakistan to get Bin Laden during the 08 election.[/B]

Then he ordered the mission, amongst stiff objections from his own cabinet and the military, and here we are with Bin Laden dead.

Bush's anti-terror policy stopped being credible the second we invaded Iraq. What the F does Iraq have to do with 9/11. Get back to me on that, in the meantime, I'll continue to be the college boy - Law School boy this fall.[/QUOTE]

Your skills in circular logic should serve you well in a law career.

Jungle Shift Jet · 06-11-2012, 12:58 AM

[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488545]KSM was captured in Iraq, I thought Pakistan?

What good came out of invading Iraq regarding the War on Terror?

Furthermore, who would've acted on that intel you say was all Bush and his policies - [B]all Republican candidates criticized Obama for saying he'd go into Pakistan to get Bin Laden during the 08 election.[/B]

Then he ordered the mission, amongst stiff objections from his own cabinet and the military, and here we are with Bin Laden dead.

Bush's anti-terror policy stopped being credible the second we invaded Iraq. What the F does Iraq have to do with 9/11. Get back to me on that, in the meantime, I'll continue to be the college boy - Law School boy this fall.[/QUOTE]

You mean all Democrat candidates. Back to study hall kid.

[URL]http://edition.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/07/obama.pakistan/index.html1[/URL]

It’s wrong for a person running for president of the United States to get on TV and say we’re going to go into your country unilaterally. [B]Of course America always maintains our option to do whatever we think is in the best interest of America[/B]. But we don’t go out and say “ladies and gentlemen of Germany, if ever there was a problem in your country [and] we didn’t think you were doing the right thing, we reserve the right to come in and get them out”. [B]We don’t say those things, we keep our options quiet.[/B]

[URL]

Jungle Shift Jet · 06-11-2012, 01:09 AM

[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488545] What good came out of invading Iraq regarding the War on Terror? [/QUOTE]

To name 2 obvious good things Iraq was removed as a threat and Libya turned over their WMDs that Clinton's crew knew nothing about.

Other threats remain and will as long as Islamokooks exist as well as the petroleum revenues that fund them.

cr726 · 06-11-2012, 07:56 AM

[QUOTE=shakin318;4488526]Using intel gleaned by the methods of the previous administration...methods wailed and wept about by the pussified hippified lefties until the golden sh:tbag himself was in office....now it's all good. This f-cking skell and his skank wife can't evacuate the White House fast enough[/QUOTE]

KSM's intel helped get OBL? Dr. Shakil Afridi begs to differ. Then again your post wreaks of booze.

Drunken man's words are a sober man's thoughts, stay classy.

SafetyBlitz · 06-11-2012, 01:28 PM

[QUOTE=Jungle Shift Jet;4488561]To name 2 obvious good things Iraq was removed as a threat and Libya turned over their WMDs that Clinton's crew knew nothing about.

Other threats remain and will as long as Islamokooks exist as well as the petroleum revenues that fund them.[/QUOTE]

So we invaded and spent 10 years in Iraq to remove WMDs from Libya, and kill an already neutered Saddam Hussein?

[QUOTE=Jungle Shift Jet;4488559]You mean all Democrat candidates. Back to study hall kid.

[URL]http://edition.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/07/obama.pakistan/index.html1[/URL]

It’s wrong for a person running for president of the United States to get on TV and say we’re going to go into your country unilaterally. [B]Of course America always maintains our option to do whatever we think is in the best interest of America[/B]. But we don’t go out and say “ladies and gentlemen of Germany, if ever there was a problem in your country [and] we didn’t think you were doing the right thing, we reserve the right to come in and get them out”. [B]We don’t say those things, we keep our options quiet.[/B]

[URL]

chiefst2000 · 06-11-2012, 02:10 PM

[QUOTE=cr726;4488607]KSM's intel helped get OBL? Dr. Shakil Afridi begs to differ. Then again your post wreaks of booze.

Drunken man's words are a sober man's thoughts, stay classy.[/QUOTE]

Dr. Shakil Afridi has bigger thing to worry about. Apparently someone possibly within Obama's cabinet let it slip that a Pakistani Doctor was critical in assisting us with a Positive ID once KSM's information led us to Bin Ladin's compound. It didn't take long for the Pakistanis to track the doctor down once they knew we used the info to make the ID.

cr726 · 06-11-2012, 05:00 PM

[QUOTE=chiefst2000;4488937]Dr. Shakil Afridi has bigger thing to worry about. Apparently someone possibly within Obama's cabinet let it slip that a Pakistani Doctor was critical in assisting us with a Positive ID once KSM's information led us to Bin Ladin's compound. It didn't take long for the Pakistanis to track the doctor down once they knew we used the info to make the ID.[/QUOTE]

Being an informant has risks.

chiefst2000 · 06-11-2012, 05:15 PM

[QUOTE=cr726;4489081]Being an informant has risks.[/QUOTE]

No doubt. F him right? Next time someone wants to rat out Al Qaeda they should think twice about it. That will teach those rats.

At least Barry got some good press out of the leaks

WestCoastOffensive · 06-11-2012, 05:21 PM

[QUOTE=Warfish;4488139]Only the last 3.5 years, eh?

An interesting evaluation.

.[/QUOTE]
From what I have read, BO kick-started that (apparently dead) program to actually find OBL. Now I'm not being partisan, but I thought it was relevant to your post.

WestCoastOffensive · 06-11-2012, 05:30 PM

[QUOTE=cr726;4489081]Being an informant has risks.[/QUOTE]
Whoa! :eek:

Dr. Afidi courageously ran a fake inocculation campaign; he was no shady, drugged-out skell.

06-11-2012, 05:21 PM	#39
WestCoastOffensive Lying to the Smithsonian Board Moderator Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: SF via Strong Island Posts: 26,686	[QUOTE=Warfish;4488139]Only the last 3.5 years, eh? An interesting evaluation. .[/QUOTE] From what I have read, BO kick-started that (apparently dead) program to actually find OBL. Now I'm not being partisan, but I thought it was relevant to your post. Last edited by WestCoastOffensive; 06-12-2012 at 10:44 PM.

06-10-2012, 03:17 PM	#21
PlumberKhan BRACE YOURSELVES FOR 12... Hall Of Fame Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Van down by the river Posts: 21,029	[QUOTE=sackdance;4488363]Obama escalated Afghanistan....[/QUOTE] Why? Because that's where Al Queada actually was. Not in Iraq. LOLZ.....

06-10-2012, 09:32 PM	#22
Jungle Shift Jet Occasionally stoops to uploading hotties pix to boost his postcount All Pro Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alive with a superior intellect in an erudite world of fine tastes that you will never, EVER acquire Posts: 5,045	[QUOTE=PlumberKhan;4488354]Obama pisses these tools off. Why? Because he has managed to get better results using less $$$ and spilling less American blood. Obama proved that you don't need a large scale occupation to achieve results. But the Kenyan wasn't supposed to do that. Remember? Obama was going to welcome Al Queda into the White House for tea and crumpets...not actually kill them at a higher rate than Captain Brush Clearer. Republicans have as much strategic intelligence as my dog trying to catch a squirrel. They're not good at it and they look fcking retarded trying to do it....[/QUOTE] Hey Rainbow Connection talk about strategic intelligence you don't get any when you don't waterboard and you certainly don't get any when you summmarily excecute a whole bunch of bad guys (by itself, a good thing) without capturing any (a bad thing) Between the drones and choppers giftwrapped to Iran and Pakistan (places Al Qaeda "wasn't" either) and moles/double agents compromised by the MSM/WH you tell me if B. Hussein is a fcking retard or not.

06-10-2012, 11:00 PM	#23
Warfish JetsInsider.com Legend Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 35,000	[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488289]Did Obama lie to start to a war?[/quote] More talking points. When an (R) wages war based on faulty intel, it's a massive right wing conspiracy for Oil. When a (D) wages a war based on European Oil Interests, it's REALLY to stop a potential massacre.....pay no mind to the Syria across the way.:rolleyes: A walking talking point these days, some rather mouldy old ones at that.:zzz:

06-10-2012, 11:19 PM	#24
SafetyBlitz Veteran Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,997	[QUOTE=Warfish;4488514]More talking points. When an (R) wages war based on faulty intel, it's a massive right wing conspiracy for Oil. When a (D) wages a war based on European Oil Interests, it's REALLY to stop a potential massacre.....pay no mind to the Syria across the way.:rolleyes: A walking talking point these days, some rather mouldy old ones at that.:zzz:[/QUOTE] Keep comparing Libya to Iraq, lets see where this goes. Did we invade Libya? How long did we occupy Libya? How much did the Libya operation cost? How many American service personnel died in Libya?

06-10-2012, 11:29 PM	#25
shakin318 Beslubbering beef-witted lout Board Moderator Jets Insider VIP Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Location: Funkytown Posts: 7,181	[QUOTE=PlumberKhan;4488354]Obama pisses these tools off. Why? Because he has managed to get better results using less $$$ and spilling less American blood. [/QUOTE] Using intel gleaned by the methods of the previous administration...methods wailed and wept about by the pussified hippified lefties until the golden sh:tbag himself was in office....now it's all good. This f-cking skell and his skank wife can't evacuate the White House fast enough

06-10-2012, 11:30 PM	#26
SafetyBlitz Veteran Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,997	[QUOTE=shakin318;4488526]Using intel gleaned by the methods of the previous administration...methods wailed and wept about by the pussified hippified lefties until the golden sh:tbag himself was in office....now it's all good. This f-cking skell and his skank wife can't evacuate the White House fast enough[/QUOTE] Bush used that same intel and decided to invade Iraq. Game. Set. Match.

06-10-2012, 11:39 PM	#27
shakin318 Beslubbering beef-witted lout Board Moderator Jets Insider VIP Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Location: Funkytown Posts: 7,181	[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488528]Bush used that same intel and decided to invade Iraq. Game. Set. Match.[/QUOTE] Really? He used the intel secured by waterboarding Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his scumbag ilk to invade Iraq? You may want to take a remedial course in calendar reading. You can fit it in right between your WaPo Talking Points 101 and Women's Study courses, college boy.

06-11-2012, 12:09 AM	#28
SafetyBlitz Veteran Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,997	[QUOTE=shakin318;4488535]Really? He used the intel secured by waterboarding Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his scumbag ilk to invade Iraq? You may want to take a remedial course in calendar reading. You can fit it in right between your WaPo Talking Points 101 and Women's Study courses, college boy.[/QUOTE] KSM was captured in Iraq, I thought Pakistan? What good came out of invading Iraq regarding the War on Terror? Furthermore, who would've acted on that intel you say was all Bush and his policies - [B]all Republican candidates criticized Obama for saying he'd go into Pakistan to get Bin Laden during the 08 election.[/B] Then he ordered the mission, amongst stiff objections from his own cabinet and the military, and here we are with Bin Laden dead. Bush's anti-terror policy stopped being credible the second we invaded Iraq. What the F does Iraq have to do with 9/11. Get back to me on that, in the meantime, I'll continue to be the college boy - Law School boy this fall.

06-11-2012, 12:18 AM	#29
Bonhomme Richard Board Moderator Jets Insider VIP Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 4,103	[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488545]KSM was captured in Iraq, I thought Pakistan? What good came out of invading Iraq regarding the War on Terror? Furthermore, who would've acted on that intel you say was all Bush and his policies - [B]all Republican candidates criticized Obama for saying he'd go into Pakistan to get Bin Laden during the 08 election.[/B] [/QUOTE] Hmm... honestly, I don't remember that.

06-11-2012, 12:20 AM	#30
SafetyBlitz Veteran Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,997	[QUOTE=Bonhomme Richard;4488548]Hmm... honestly, I don't remember that.[/QUOTE] Romney, McCain and Hillary. Ron Paul too if you consider him a real candidate.

06-11-2012, 12:28 AM	#31
shakin318 Beslubbering beef-witted lout Board Moderator Jets Insider VIP Charter JI Member Join Date: May 1999 Location: Funkytown Posts: 7,181	[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488545]KSM was captured in Iraq, I thought Pakistan? What good came out of invading Iraq regarding the War on Terror? Furthermore, who would've acted on that intel you say was all Bush and his policies - [B]all Republican candidates criticized Obama for saying he'd go into Pakistan to get Bin Laden during the 08 election.[/B] Then he ordered the mission, amongst stiff objections from his own cabinet and the military, and here we are with Bin Laden dead. Bush's anti-terror policy stopped being credible the second we invaded Iraq. What the F does Iraq have to do with 9/11. Get back to me on that, in the meantime, I'll continue to be the college boy - Law School boy this fall.[/QUOTE] Your skills in circular logic should serve you well in a law career.

06-11-2012, 12:58 AM	#32
Jungle Shift Jet Occasionally stoops to uploading hotties pix to boost his postcount All Pro Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alive with a superior intellect in an erudite world of fine tastes that you will never, EVER acquire Posts: 5,045	[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488545]KSM was captured in Iraq, I thought Pakistan? What good came out of invading Iraq regarding the War on Terror? Furthermore, who would've acted on that intel you say was all Bush and his policies - [B]all Republican candidates criticized Obama for saying he'd go into Pakistan to get Bin Laden during the 08 election.[/B] Then he ordered the mission, amongst stiff objections from his own cabinet and the military, and here we are with Bin Laden dead. Bush's anti-terror policy stopped being credible the second we invaded Iraq. What the F does Iraq have to do with 9/11. Get back to me on that, in the meantime, I'll continue to be the college boy - Law School boy this fall.[/QUOTE] You mean all Democrat candidates. Back to study hall kid. [URL]http://edition.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/07/obama.pakistan/index.html1[/URL] It’s wrong for a person running for president of the United States to get on TV and say we’re going to go into your country unilaterally. [B]Of course America always maintains our option to do whatever we think is in the best interest of America[/B]. But we don’t go out and say “ladies and gentlemen of Germany, if ever there was a problem in your country [and] we didn’t think you were doing the right thing, we reserve the right to come in and get them out”. [B]We don’t say those things, we keep our options quiet.[/B] [URL]

06-11-2012, 01:09 AM	#33
Jungle Shift Jet Occasionally stoops to uploading hotties pix to boost his postcount All Pro Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alive with a superior intellect in an erudite world of fine tastes that you will never, EVER acquire Posts: 5,045	[QUOTE=SafetyBlitz;4488545] What good came out of invading Iraq regarding the War on Terror? [/QUOTE] To name 2 obvious good things Iraq was removed as a threat and Libya turned over their WMDs that Clinton's crew knew nothing about. Other threats remain and will as long as Islamokooks exist as well as the petroleum revenues that fund them.

06-11-2012, 07:56 AM	#34
cr726 Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 13,329	[QUOTE=shakin318;4488526]Using intel gleaned by the methods of the previous administration...methods wailed and wept about by the pussified hippified lefties until the golden sh:tbag himself was in office....now it's all good. This f-cking skell and his skank wife can't evacuate the White House fast enough[/QUOTE] KSM's intel helped get OBL? Dr. Shakil Afridi begs to differ. Then again your post wreaks of booze. Drunken man's words are a sober man's thoughts, stay classy.

06-11-2012, 01:28 PM	#35
SafetyBlitz Veteran Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,997	[QUOTE=Jungle Shift Jet;4488561]To name 2 obvious good things Iraq was removed as a threat and Libya turned over their WMDs that Clinton's crew knew nothing about. Other threats remain and will as long as Islamokooks exist as well as the petroleum revenues that fund them.[/QUOTE] So we invaded and spent 10 years in Iraq to remove WMDs from Libya, and kill an already neutered Saddam Hussein? [QUOTE=Jungle Shift Jet;4488559]You mean all Democrat candidates. Back to study hall kid. [URL]http://edition.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/07/obama.pakistan/index.html1[/URL] It’s wrong for a person running for president of the United States to get on TV and say we’re going to go into your country unilaterally. [B]Of course America always maintains our option to do whatever we think is in the best interest of America[/B]. But we don’t go out and say “ladies and gentlemen of Germany, if ever there was a problem in your country [and] we didn’t think you were doing the right thing, we reserve the right to come in and get them out”. [B]We don’t say those things, we keep our options quiet.[/B] [URL]

06-11-2012, 02:10 PM	#36
chiefst2000 Champion of Common Sense All Pro Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,838	[QUOTE=cr726;4488607]KSM's intel helped get OBL? Dr. Shakil Afridi begs to differ. Then again your post wreaks of booze. Drunken man's words are a sober man's thoughts, stay classy.[/QUOTE] Dr. Shakil Afridi has bigger thing to worry about. Apparently someone possibly within Obama's cabinet let it slip that a Pakistani Doctor was critical in assisting us with a Positive ID once KSM's information led us to Bin Ladin's compound. It didn't take long for the Pakistanis to track the doctor down once they knew we used the info to make the ID.

06-11-2012, 05:00 PM	#37
cr726 Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 13,329	[QUOTE=chiefst2000;4488937]Dr. Shakil Afridi has bigger thing to worry about. Apparently someone possibly within Obama's cabinet let it slip that a Pakistani Doctor was critical in assisting us with a Positive ID once KSM's information led us to Bin Ladin's compound. It didn't take long for the Pakistanis to track the doctor down once they knew we used the info to make the ID.[/QUOTE] Being an informant has risks.

06-11-2012, 05:15 PM	#38
chiefst2000 Champion of Common Sense All Pro Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,838	[QUOTE=cr726;4489081]Being an informant has risks.[/QUOTE] No doubt. F him right? Next time someone wants to rat out Al Qaeda they should think twice about it. That will teach those rats. At least Barry got some good press out of the leaks

06-11-2012, 05:30 PM	#40
WestCoastOffensive Lying to the Smithsonian Board Moderator Jets Insider VIP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: SF via Strong Island Posts: 26,686	[QUOTE=cr726;4489081]Being an informant has risks.[/QUOTE] Whoa! :eek: Dr. Afidi courageously ran a fake inocculation campaign; he was no shady, drugged-out skell.